1. What general law or statutory remedies ( if any) should EY seek against Roberta? The remedies for breach a general law duty include an injunction‚ compensation or damages‚ an account of profits‚ rescission of a contract‚ and a constructive trust. Firstly‚ the company can seek an injunction‚ which is an order of the court requiring the director to stop doing something or to undertake a particular action‚ in this case‚ EY can terminate the contract. Secondly‚ in this case‚ even though EY has not
Free Law Contract Contract law
ADVICE TO BOARD OF DERECTORS OF VERONICA AIRLINES I INTRODUCTION As in Qantas Airways Ltd v Lucinda Holdforth‚ the case brings the issue of confidentiality in the context of employers and employees.[ Qantas Airways Ltd v Lucinda Holdforth [2015] NSWSC 821] In the second section‚ some relevant legislation protection of confidential information will be listed. In the third section this paper will evaluate the current protection regime‚ in
Premium Law Confidentiality Employment
the Delhi High Court refused to grant an injunction (temporary) on Cipla from selling in India‚ a generic versions (Eroclip) of a patented anti-cancer drug (Erlotinib or Tarceva) belonging to Roche. However‚ Cipla was disallowed to export to other countries (temporarily). Due to the inability of the plaintiff (Roche) to prove its contention‚ the judgement of the case was based on the grounds of “public interest” To force a judgement favouring the injunction on Cipla the plaintiff (Roche) had to contend
Premium Prima facie Legal burden of proof Judgment
04-Feb-0 Contract of Employment: Civil code has ~3300 articles‚ contains all civil/general laws of Quebec. Contract[1] of Employment is a portion of the code. [2085] “what it’s all about.” An employee: Contractor: No direction and control‚[2] contractor sets his own daily schedule‚ vacation schedule‚ provides his own tools (e.g. computer)‚ is able to subcontract work. o e.g. lawyer: is hired as an agent/agency‚ does not direct/control • Important to specify between the
Premium Termination of employment
a civil rights attorney‚ brings a cause of action in federal court to have the new regulation ruled unconstitutional. The federal court immediately rules that the state law violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment and issues an injunction against its enforcement. A week later‚ the state passes a new law that reads "Because we don’t believe that we are capable of managing integrated swimming‚ beach and golf facilities‚ we are hereby closing all such state-run facilities." Brenda
Premium United States United States Constitution Law
Westlaw India Delivery Summary Request made by : |IP USER 1| Request made on:|Tuesday‚ 06 November‚ 2012 at 18:02 IST| || Content Type:| > ... > B| Title : |Bina Murlidhar Hemdev and Others v Kanhaiyalal Lokram Hemdev and Others| Delivery selection:|Current Document| Number of documents delivered:|1| 2012 Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited Bina Murlidhar Hemdev and Others v Kanhaiyalal Lokram Hemdev and Others Supreme Court of India 14 May 1999 Appeal (civil) 3141 of 1999 The Judgment
Premium
CONTENTS • INRODUCTION • Origin • South Korean lawsuit • Japan lawsuits • German courts • French and Italian courts • Dutch courts • Australian courts • British courts • U.S. courts • First US Trial • US verdict • Injunction of US sales during first trial • First trial appeal • Second US Trial • Controversy Apple
Premium Apple Inc.
sought out minor crimes‚ was conducted once a month‚ the Manor court which was to sort the workers of the kingdom remained the same. A petitioner who obtained a favourable judgement in the common law courts was prevented from enforcing it by an injunction granted by the “court of chancery‚ Earl of Oxford case (1615)21 ER 485”. The conflict between the courts of common law” .(Mulholland‚ 2001) The Writ System Owing to the
Free Common law Law Judge
“chunk” the information to make it easier for you to digest. Following is a chart that summarizes the evolution of labor laws: 1790s to 1842 Common Law Conspiracy Theory Unions as conspiracies Dominance of injunctions issued without full hearings; heavy court presence Injunctions applies to yellow dog contracts which the courts deemed enforceable Mainstream economics foundation 1842 – 1932 Unions As Corporations Danbury Hatters case (1842): union boycott violated Sherman Antitrust Act
Premium National Labor Relations Act Law Collective bargaining
FOUNDATION IN ARTS LAW OF TORT ASSIGNMENT On the facts‚ the claimant Garfield suffered smashed panes of glass in his green house and sustains a fractured skull when he is hit on the head by a cricket ball. The local cricket club owner(defendant) may have an action bought by Garfield(claimant) under the tort of negligence or private nuisance.The author will first discuss on negligence and then later on to private nuisance. In the novel cases where the existence of a legal duty is less
Premium Tort Law