CUEA SCHOOL OF LAW General Principles of Equity I History of equity Introduction of the doctrines of equity into Nigeria The relation between Equity and Common Law Conflicts between Equity and Law Nature of equitable rights I Nature of equitable rights II UNIT 1 CONTENTS 1.0 2.0 3.0 HISTORY OF EQUITY 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Introduction Objectives Main content 3.1 Law and equity 3.2 Conscience 3.3 Difference and conflict 3.4 Equity and the common law in the narrow sense Conclusion Summary
Premium Common law
26 February 2012 Chapter 32- The Politics of Boom and Bust The Republican “Old Guard” Returns Harding inaugurated in 1921. His “ohio gang” consisted of Hughes‚ Mellon‚ Hoover‚ Albert Fall‚ and Daugherty. Hughes was secretary of state‚ Mellon- sec. Of treasury‚ Hoover- Sec. of commerce‚ Fall- Sec. of the Interior‚ and Daugherty- Attorney General GOP Reaction at the Throttle Harding known as an “amiable boob” He wanted the gov’t to help guide business along the path to profits Adkins V.
Premium Herbert Hoover Great Depression Warren G. Harding
y “The most important obstacle to the development of Trade Union and labour rights was divisions within the Trade Union movement.” How far do you agree with this statement? Divisions: * Industrial Workers of the World * Immigrants (old v. new) vs. US * Unions didn’t want to let Af-Ams in- they formed own organisation BSCP * Some welcomed those from other ethnic backgrounds and women * 1935-55 CIO broke from AFL * Rich/poor fragmentation of workforce * Lack of women
Premium Trade union
departing personnel by providing remuneration and shares in exchange for his non-compete obligations afterwards. 4. Remedies It should be stated that Veronica Airlines has the right to terminate the contract of the employment and seek for injunctions if any employees were found disclosing or showing obvious potential to disclose confidential information.[ Pedley v IPMS Pty Ltd t/as Peckvonhartel [2013] FWC 4282] Other remedies include orders for delivery up or destruction and account of
Premium Confidentiality Law Employment
what was happening in the area‚ before they decided what was the best course of action that should be taken. After the initial reports where taken‚ it was determine that the “Civil Injunction Process” should be used and that was the best course of action. While the Chief believes that the “civil injunction process” is the way to go‚ he has to convince the other team members that this plan is what is best for the community and the police officers in the area. He realizes that this way of
Premium Crime Criminology Police
store in the Ghetto. The economic outcomes are to gain back $9‚000. There are not really any legal requirements against this. There are several ethical duties that this case violates. This violates the self –interest‚ personal virtues‚ religious injunctions‚ universal duties‚ and the distributive justice ethical
Premium Department store Virtue Retailing
It is appropriate that the patient was awarded $25‚000 attorney fees. Regardless of the potential Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) violation‚ the patient vicariously through her family and friends was forced to seek injunction against Memorial Hospital enjoining the hospital from refusing to admit the patient. She further incurred cost in her subsequent action‚ which are rightly reimburse based on the findings of the court. With regard to the permanent junctive relief
Premium Jury Emergency medical services Medicine
Task1 What kind of liability do you think Ton should bear in Scenario 1? Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability. There are three differences between liability and contractual liability: A. The difference of base. Contractual liability means that due to the breach of duty‚ contractual collateral obligation of contract or violates the "contract law" provisions of the obligations. Finding out a contractual liability has to be
Premium Tort Tort law
denying the claimant exemplary damages. While the ECHR did decide in Mosley v UK that it was within the State’s margin of appreciation to decide how to perform its positive obligations under Article 8 ECHR‚ it is submitted that exemplary damages and injunctions should have been available to the claimant‚ particularly given the unfair gains obtained by the invaders of Mosley’s privacy. Even where the tort exists‚ English courts’ reluctance to recognise a general principle of
Premium Privacy law Human rights
1. Sion Soleimany (Appellant‚ United Kingdom) v. Abner Soleimany (Respondent‚ United Kingdom) Court of Appeal‚ Civil Division‚ 30 January 1998‚ United Kingdom Facts Sion Soleimany (hereinafter referred to as the father) and his son‚ Abner Soleimany (refers as the son) were engaged in the export of Persian carpets from Iran. Between 1980 and 1983‚ the son arranged for the export of the carpets from Iran in contravention of Iranian Revenue laws and export controls. The carpets were sold by the father
Premium Arbitration Court