LLB course) PART A- Law of torts PART B – Consumer Protection Law PART –A General Principles 1. General Principles – Definition‚ distinction between tort‚ crime‚ contract‚ breach of trust. 2. Essential conditions of liability – Damnum Since injuria‚ Injuria sine damnum‚ Malice‚ Motive. 3. Foundations of tortuous liability‚ fault liability‚ strict liability‚ principles of insurance in torts. 4. Capacity of parties to use and / or be used – State its subordinates – executive officers‚ judicial officers
Premium Tort
TABLE OF CONTENTS Definition of a tort 5 Liability of a state 5 Article 300 6 Evolution of Constitutional Tort 7 Need For Constitutional Torts 8 Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium 9 Injuria Sine Damnum 9 Essentials for Constitutional Torts 9 Differences between constitutional tort and private tort 10 CASES WHICH LED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL TORTS 11 Kethri v. state of Bihar 11 Rudal Shah V. State of Bihar 11
Premium Tort Law Human rights
LAW OF TORT PART– PART–ONE Objectives of this Topic By the end of the topic the learner should be able to: * D fi iti of tort and related t Definition f t t d l t d terms * The difference between tort and criminal law and tort and contract law * Understand the nature and liability of tort * Explain the functions of the law of torts * Explain the capacity to sue or be sued for various p p y individuals and entities * Understand the specific torts their defences and remedies available
Premium Tort Law Contract
INTRODUCTION The law of delict is a branch of private law falling under the law of obligations. It deals with civil wrongs as opposed to criminal wrongs. The essential purpose of the law of delict is to afford a civil remedy‚ usually by way of compensation‚ for wrongful conduct that has caused harm to others. A delict is the breach of a general duty imposed by law which will ground an action for damages at the suit of any person to whom the duty was owed and who has suffered harm in consequence of
Premium Tort Tort law
Negligence is a common civil law case that occurs in many workplaces. “Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person.” (Legal services commission of SA‚ 2013) These laws creating equality for people done wrong off. Samuel Johnson quoted‚ “He who thinks he can afford to be negligent is not far from being poor” This quote points out that you might as well be poor if you think you cannot look after people and get away with it. This is a growing concern
Premium Law Tort Negligence
Week 8 Lecture Aspects of the Tort of Negligence 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introduction The general principles of liability for negligence Product liability Liability for negligent misstatement Vicarious liability THE LAW OF TORT (民事侵權法) 1. What is Tort? One party suffers damage or loss as the result of the action of another No need for a contractual relationship The law of tort regulates the behaviour of individuals and legal persons 2 1. Introduction Tort: “Wrong”
Premium Tort Tort law
Employers liability Cases Walker v Northumberland County Council (1995) This case is notable as one of the first successful claims for work-related stress. Mr Walker was employed by Northumberland County Council as a senior social worker. At the time of the case‚ he had worked for the authority for 17 years‚ dealing mainly with cases of child abuse. In the 1980s‚ his workload gradually increased to such an extent that in 1986 he suffered a nervous breakdown. This was diagnosed by his GP who recommended
Premium Employment Tort Law
Teacher’s role in the classroom is to take place of the parents whilst in school. They also must take reasonable action to decrease the likelihood of injury to students. (Queensland teachers union‚ teachers and law 5th edition page 7) Three elements to establish a negligence case A duty of care was owed There was a breach of the duty Damages occurred because of the breach Duty of Care Two points in order to establish a duty of care Should a teacher
Premium Tort Law Tort law
Case – British Railways board Vs Herrington Relevance - Trespasser duty of care - Common humanity - Occupiers liability act 1984 Facts - Railway line operated by BRB ran through property open to public - Fences were in poor repair - 1965 children seen on line - Child severely injured when he stepped on line after passing through broken fence - Plaintiff claimed damages for negligence Ruling - House of lords held over trespassers‚ a duty to take steps as common humanity to avert
Premium Tort law Tort Law
10: Sine waves and phasors • Sine Waves • Rotating Rod • Phasors • Phasor Examples • Phasor arithmetic • Complex Impedances • Phasor Analysis • CIVIL • Impedance and Admittance • Summary (Irwin/Nelms Ch 8) 10: Sine waves and phasors E1.1 Analysis of Circuits (2012-2517) Phasors: 10 – 1 / 11 Sine Waves 10: Sine waves and phasors • Sine Waves • Rotating Rod • Phasors • Phasor Examples • Phasor arithmetic • Complex Impedances • Phasor Analysis • CIVIL • Impedance and Admittance
Premium Electrical impedance Alternating current