which the body cannot do without / has difficulty to give up. 1m 12 HKCEE Human Biology 2003 I Q3b Structured questions (p. 23-23) 13 a Nicotine 1m b Any two from: 2.5m x 2 Carbon monoxide (CO) 0.5m CO binds to haemoglobin (Hb) to form carboxyhaemoglobin. 1m Hb has greater affinity for CO. / CO irreversibly reduces the oxygen carrying ability of blood. 1m OR Tar 0.5m Tar accumulates in the lungs. 1m Tar increases the diffusion barrier. 1m Tar is carcinogenic. 1m Tar paralyses
Premium Obesity Cancer Hypertension
672 x 10-11 N m2 kg-2) (8) (ii) Comment on the magnitude and significance of the values obtained in (a)(i) (4) (b) The wavefunctions of hydrogen atoms‚ Ha and Hb‚ are ψa and ψb‚ respectively. (i) Given that ψa and ψb can be positive or negative‚ write expressions for the possible wavefunctions for the interaction of Ha and Hb. (4) (ii) Determine the expressions for the intensities in each case in
Premium PH indicator Quantum mechanics
printed‚ some values had to be calculated and compared to one another. The first value needed was the Thermodynamic Work on the system which was founded by the equation: With=(pi(d^2))/4*(Pb-Pa)*(hc-hb). Where d was given to be 32.5mm‚ Pb and Pa where the pressures at the points B and A measured in kPA‚ and hb and hc are the heights of the piston at point B and C. This comes out to be: Wth= 1.37E^-2J. Next‚ the mechanical work had to be calculated using the equation: Wm= mgh. Where m is the mass in kg
Premium Energy Thermodynamics Heat
Identifying and comparing the main components of blood. By Jason T Morrison. Blood‚ what an amazing substance. It has only been since being set this task by one of my tutors‚ Dr C Dublon that I have truly realised how amazing blood really is. Blood is not as some people may think just made up of one component‚ but many different components working together in an almost symbiotic relationship. The average human being carries approximately five litres of blood‚ which is equivalent to about
Free Blood Immune system White blood cell
References: All your course materials are on the Harvard site‚ and/or posted on Moodle or handed out by the instructor‚ except the one book we will use which is the Chritstensen book below: ► - The Innovator’s Dilemma‚ by Clayton Christensen‚ HBS Press‚ 1997. Course Start Date: Jan 16‚ 2013
Premium Strategic management Management
Director of Financial Management at Harvard Business School (HBS) (Ekawati‚ 2008). Rick had to oversee the Student Educational Loan fund (SELF)‚ analyze a change of plans and incorporate these changes into the strategy of SELF. This report will describe the analysis of the solutions to his problems. In chapter 3 we will provide a brief overview of SELFs activities and strategy and give a schematic overview of how SELF is incorporated in HBS. Chapter 4 deals with the problems which arise when SELF
Premium Debt Interest Derivative
Product Gross Margin Calculation vs. Product Contribution Margin Calculation Assigning the overhead costs to the products shows how profitable the products are after deducting all cost. However‚ it is important to find the appropriate method of overhead cost allocation. In Sippican’s case the traditional accounting method is used‚ which does not reflect the real resource usage of the different product lines. The correct method in this case would be to apply the time-driven ABC approach for cost
Premium Cost accounting Capacity utilization Costs
IT at Work 1.1 Watson Wins Jeopardy‚ Leaving Human Champions in Its Silicon Dust Questions 1. Explain how Watson figured out the most likely response to win the tournament. Watson parsed the question down into keywords and sentence fragments in order to find statistically related phrases. Watson was able to quickly execute thousands of language analysis algorithms simultaneously to compile potential answers and determine the level of confidence associated with each one. 2. View the IBM demo‚ “Turning
Premium Strategic management Data management Business intelligence
References: Henry Tam and the MGI Team. (2003). (HBS case #9-404-068) Polzer‚ J. (2003). Leading Teams (HBS case #90403-094). Eisenhardt‚ K.‚ Kahwajy‚ J.‚ & Bourgeouis‚ L.‚ (1997). How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard Business Review‚ 77-85. Cosier‚ R. A. & Schwenk‚ C.R. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike:
Premium Management Strategic management Marketing
blind taste test survey with questions about their brand choices. The third part is a qualitative individual research using ZMET. The HBS team use a survey to pick people whom then use selected images to create a light beer experience collage. Data collection starts off with obtaining information on the light beer market. Using secondary resources the HBS students summarised data on historic growth percentages‚ future growth prospects with respect to other beers and future consumer trends.
Premium Brand Brand management Trademark