FIN 819: Financial Management Administrative Issues Course Overview FIN 819: Lecture 1 Today’s plan l Administrative issues l Course overview l Team formation • prerequisite • add‚ drop and withdraw • projects • case writing and discussion • final exam • final grade FIN 819: Lecture 1 The instructor l l l l l My name is George Li Office: DTC 582 and BUS 315 Email: li123456@sfsu.edu Office hours: Monday: 1:30 p.m. to 3:30
Premium Capital structure Finance Corporate finance
Scholar Alert: [ review "financial studies" forthcoming ] Bank capital‚ competition and loan spreads M Fischer‚ S Steffen - 2010 Page 1. Bank capital‚ competition and loan spreads Markus Fischer ∗ Sascha Steffen † August 22‚ 2010 Abstract This paper empirically investigates whether well-capitalized banks charge higher spreads using a dataset of all ... Commentary: Monetary Policy after the Fall JB Taylor‚ C Bean - 2010 ... Louis Review‚ May June 2010‚ 165-176 Taylor‚ John B. (2010c)‚ “The
Premium Financial services Corporate finance Economics
America (HCA) Staff Analysis Statement of Problem HCA‚ after following a conservative financial policy since its establishment‚ has entered the new decade preparing to make some changes in order to realign their financial strategy and capital structure. Since establishment‚ HCA has often been used as a measure for the entire proprietary hospital industry. Is it now time for the market to realign their expectations for the industry as a whole? HCA has target goals which need to be met in
Premium Bond Finance Capital structure
financed. By assuming the project is all-equity financed‚ the cost of equity (un-levered cost of capital) should be used as the discount rate in order to calculate the NPV of the project‚ because the cost of the asset will equal to the cost of equity in regardless of the capital structure. Given the information on comparable firm asset betas‚ a risk free rate and a market risk premium‚ the cost of capital is calculated as 15.8% based on the CAPM method.( rA = rE = rf + β*r(MP)‚ rA = rE =5.0% + 1.50(7
Premium Finance Capital structure Net present value
Polaroid Corporation‚ 1996 In late March 1996‚ Ralph Norwood was faced with the task of restructuring Polaroid’s capital structure. In the past‚ Polaroid had a monopoly in the instant-photography segment. However‚ with upcoming threats in the emerging digital photography industry and Polaroid experiencing recent losses in their market share due to Kodak’s competition‚ Gary T. DiCamillo‚ recently appointed CEO of Polaroid‚ headed a restructuring plan to stimulate the firm’s performance. The firm’s
Premium Finance Debt Weighted average cost of capital
Corporate finance P. Frantz‚ R. Payne‚ J. Favilukis FN3092‚ 2790092 2011 Undergraduate study in Economics‚ Management‚ Finance and the Social Sciences This subject guide is for a Level 3 course (also known as a ‘300 course’) offered as part of the University of London International Programmes in Economics‚ Management‚ Finance and the Social Sciences. This is equivalent to Level 6 within the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in England‚ Wales and Northern Ireland (FHEQ). For more
Premium Corporate finance Capital structure Finance
critical you consider the tax‚ risk‚ and revenue implications of the three proposed capital structures. Financial Analysis – See appendix for detailed methodology and calculations | Capital Structure | Discount Rate | Net Present Value | Flow to Equity Approach | All Equity | R0 15.8% | $1‚228‚485 | Adjusted Present Value Approach | $750k Debt in Perpetuity | Rs 15.8% | $1‚528‚485 | Weighted Average Cost of Capital Approach | Debt/Market Value of .25 | RWACC 15.1% | $1‚469‚972 | | 2002E
Premium Finance Weighted average cost of capital Net present value
risk adjustment in the capital budgeting allocation process by answering the following questions. a. Explain why risk adjustments are important and how they can affect firm value. Without the correct risk adjustment the firms stock will lose value by taking on high risk projects. The firm could also be considered uncompetitive if they reject low cost/low risk projects. b. Explain how the single hurdle rate currently used by Northern Forest Products can change the risk structure of the company. For
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Risk Capital structure
Prepared by: Victor Amoasii Word count: 3697 CONTENTS 1. Megafon overview and analysis of agency costs 2. Risk Profile Analysis 3. Weighted Average Cost of Capital 4. Megafon valuation 5. Capital investments risk analysis 6. Capital structure and dividend policy Megafon overview and analysis of agency costs Megafon is one of the leading three Russian mobile operators. Its majority shareholder is Alisher Usmanov‚ who controls
Premium Dividend Discounted cash flow Weighted average cost of capital
America‚ achieve operating and capital expenditure synergies and consolidate its business scale and financial strength. As part of its integration strategy‚ Repsol-YPF will begin to dispose of select assets which do not correspond to its core businesses outlined above or to its core geographic areas which include Spain‚ Latin America and North Africa. Synergies Estimate Cost savings after tax of $350 million by 2000‚ 1.6% cost savings in 1998‚ reduction in capital expenditure from $15.6 billion
Premium Stock Stock market Corporate finance