Dr. Tim Brueggemann MBA54001OL Date 10/05/2011 Situation Baxter Manufacturing Company (BMC) is a metal stampings company. Its major customers include‚ Ford‚ General Motors‚ Honda of America‚ General Electric and Whirlpool. The company is made up of two divisions it makes brackets and other components that go into the finished product‚ they also make motor casings. BMC employees about 420 non-union employees and has been steadily growing for the last 6 years. They have been approached to
Free Mexico Mexico City Computer
number crunching is an end unto itself. However‚ basic financial analysis will always be an important part of our toolkit for making pricing decisions. The document which follows contains the “answers” to these two case study assignments: Ace Manufacturing and Healthy Spring Water. Despite the financial emphasis‚ they are similar to the previous cases insofar as they’re intentionally open-ended and somewhat vague to encourage you to draw out all of the contingencies and factors that need to be considered
Premium Cost Costs Variable cost
one-time-only special order for a product similar to one offered to regular customers. The following per unit data apply for sales to regular customers: Direct materials $455 Direct labor 300 Variable manufacturing support 45 Fixed manufacturing support 100 Total manufacturing costs 900 Markup (60%) 540 Targeted selling price $1440 Grant’s Kitchens has excess capacity. Ms. Wang wants the cabinets in cherry rather than oak‚ so direct material costs will increase by $30 per unit
Premium Variable cost Costs Cost
Superior Manufacturing Company Q1. Based on the 2004 statement of profit and loss data (Exhibits 1 and 2)‚ do you agree with Water’s decision to keep product 103? Table 1: Product 103 Costs |Product 103 Costs | | |direct |indirect | |Fixed | |16‚039 | |Variable |5‚763 |7‚181 | If product 103 is terminated‚ there will be
Premium Costs Cost Variable cost
Change Management The company was founded by Dr. Riordan‚ a professor of chemistry he started Riordan plastics‚ Inc in 1991. Riordan Manufacturing is a global plastics‚ medical supplies‚ stents‚ automotive parts‚ appliance manufacture ’s parts‚ airplane parts‚ and beverage containers manufacturer. Riordan has 500 employees with a projected annual earnings of $46 million and a fortune of 1000 enterprises with revenues of $1 billion. Riordan Manufacturing has 4 worldwide locations Albany
Premium Organizational structure Organizational culture
|100 |80 | |Manufacturing Overhead ($40 per DLH) | 200 | 160 | | Total per unit cost |$1‚000 | $660 | In 2012‚ Gerber manufactured 30‚000 units of the Royale and 10‚000 units of the Majestic. The overhead rate of $40 per direct labor hour was determined by dividing total expected manufacturing overhead of $7‚600‚000 by the total direct labor
Premium Costs Activity-based costing Cost
investigation on the effectiveness of the internal Controls and accounting system of Cookridge Carpets Company. It also has some additional contents such as recommendations that helps the company to improve its strengths and weaknesses to protect the company’s reputation. 1.2. The researcher also investigated on the stakeholders of the Cookridge Carpets company‚ both internal and external. The stakeholders play a very
Premium Microsoft Excel Accounts payable Accounts receivable
Brief Summary: LEAN manufacturing is a global electronics manufacturing services (EMS) provider located in Flextronics de Mexico (FdM). The company is focused on efficiency and optimization of manufacturing flow. The EMS is a tough business that is driven by thin profit margins. EMS manufacturers rely on leveraging huge economies of scale and purchasing power. These companies focus on return on invested capital (ROIC) as a key metric because it provides a sense of how well a company is utilizing its
Premium Conveyor belt Assembly line Production line
Audit Committee Quality‚ Auditor Independence‚ and Internal Control Weaknesses Yan Zhang‚ Jian Zhou‚ and Nan Zhou* * All authors are from SUNY – Binghamton. We thank two anonymous reviewers for detailed and insightful suggestions that have significantly improved the paper. We also thank workshop participants at the 2006 American Accounting Association Auditing Midyear Meeting and the 2006 American Accounting Association Annual Meeting for comments‚ and Raj Addepalli‚ Shanshan Chen‚ Yujing
Premium Internal control Auditing
explores legal and regulatory alternatives to confront this issue. The first outlined option is the internal manufacturing of invigilators‚ providing us with more organizational autonomy‚ alternatively we could set an industry standard either contractually or through a standard setting procedure‚ an expensive yet effective option‚ we could also develop resilience to poor invigilator manufacturing by increasing our capacity
Premium Standardization Law