MEMORANDUM TO: John Doe FR: Patricia Oswalt DA: Monday‚ April 01‚ 2013 RE: Mary Smith – auto accident / medical malpractice Introduction As requested‚ I have reviewed the facts of the above-captioned file‚ along with the applicable law and summarized same in this memorandum. Mrs. Mary Smith suffered an injury to her right ankle in an automobile accident on 10/3/95. After surgery and months of rehabilitation‚ Mrs. Smith still suffers daily. I have researched the facts regarding a personal
Premium Tort law Traffic collision Road accidents
Memorandum of Oral Pleading Parties: Mr de Jong (Claimant) and Mini-Coza (Defendant) Date and time: Thursday 4th October 2012‚ 10:00hrs Judge: Mr. de Vries The Group: Pasi Lindqvist‚ Daan Bredenbeek‚ Nick Bruurmijn and Redmer van Berkum Overview of the Facts and the Compensation Sought On the 1st of January 2011 the claimant Mr. de Jong purchased a buggie through a German provider Mini-Coza‚ who operated in the Netherlands for €275. The buggie was to be used by the claimant’s over-one-year-old
Premium Law Tort Damages
Flu Memorandum To: Representative Henry Waxman House Committee on Government Reform From: Senior Policy Analyst Date: 9/18/2012 Re: Influenza Shortage Distribution Recommendations This memo outlines ways to address the recurring shortages of the influenza vaccine that occurred in the United States between 2000 and 2004. There were two important contributing factors to these vaccine shortages. First‚ there has been a significant reduction over the past few decades in the number of
Premium Influenza vaccine Influenza Vaccine
Leslie‚ & Kale‚ LP Memo To: Supervising Attorney From: Amber Blanton Date: 5/16/2012 Re: Samantha Smith Fact: Samantha Smith slipped and fell on spilled shampoo in the aisle at the grocery store in question. After we filed our complaint with the courts; the store alleges that Ms. Smith had a duty to avoid the spillage‚ but was too distracted by her son to notice. The store feels that Ms. Smith is just as much responsible as they are. Issue: Is it equal responsibility on both parties as involved
Premium Tort Law Tort law
The world of Economics would not be the same with Adam Smith. Smith is considered to be the “Father of Economics.” Every person that has studied some form of Economics‚ whether it is Micro or Macro‚ knows why Smith is so important. However‚ few know the person behind the theory. Adam Smith was not just an Economic guru; prior to his discovery‚ he was man ordinary man. His life’s work was dedicated to Economics‚ but behind closed doors he was more than just the “Wealth of Nations.” In order to understand
Premium Adam Smith Economics
INTERNAL AUDIT 1 Internal audit ‘Internal audit’ is an appraisal activity established by management for the review of accounting and internal control systems as a service to the entity. It reviews‚ monitors and make recommendations for the improvement of systems. Other activities include: Examination of financial information Review of economy‚ efficiency and effectiveness (‘value-for-money’ audits) Review of compliance with external laws and regulations Review of internal policies Review
Premium Auditing Audit Internal audit
Catherine Smith was miss-treated in this situation as she had been to the police numerous times and never was there once a charge laied against Kevin smith. The one time Catherine retaliated she was put on trial and was almost sentenced to 25 years jail for only one offence when Kevin had committed 17 offences which were 3 attempted murders and several sexual assaults. The police did nothing even know Catherine had gone to them and they did nothing at all‚ that was not fair on Catherine or her family
Free Crime Assault Crimes
Reviewer: Social Science II I. Adam Smith Concepts: 1. Theory of Moral Sentiments- Man is motivated by his self-interest; the approbation and acceptance of his fellow man‚ being chief. Alongside with this‚ are two natural sentiments of man: sympathy and imagination. These he uses to feel along with another who suffers. Man can place himself in the position of an impartial spectator who has no bias for or against himself or others and this causes him to have sympathy‚ imagining himself
Premium Sociology Capitalism Max Weber
ICLR: Appeal Cases/1974/HOWARD SMITH LTD. APPELLANT AND AMPOL PETROLEUM LTD. AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS [ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES] - [1974] A.C. 821 [1974] A.C. 821 [PRIVY COUNCIL] HOWARD SMITH LTD. APPELLANT AND AMPOL PETROLEUM LTD. AND OTH-ERS RESPONDENTS [ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES] 1973 Nov. 26‚ 27‚ 28‚ 29; Dec. 3; Lord Wilberforce‚ Lord Diplock‚ 1974 Feb. 14 Lord Simon of Glaisdale‚ Lord Cross of Chelsea and
Premium Stock Shareholder Corporations law
for those agents to X (Smith‚ 2007‚ p. 232). In arguing in support of externalism‚ my main focus will be on Smith’s first internalist claim which he names ‘the practicality requirement on moral judgment.’ I take this approach because Smith insists that externalists who deny his second internalist claim‚ ‘rationalism‚’ are still able to accept his practicality requirement claim; however‚ the reverse does not hold because rationalism entails the practicality requirement (Smith‚ 2007‚ p.
Premium Morality Psychology Ethics