CCM 4300 Lecture Computer Networks‚ Wireless and Mobile Communication Systems SAMPLE EXAM QUESTIONS Dr P. Shah 1 Show that‚ according to the Shannon-Hartley law‚ if the signal power (S) is equal to the noise power (N)‚ the channel capacity (C) in b/s is equal to the bandwidth B Hz. (6 marks) C= B log2 (1+S/N) If S=N C=B log2 (1+1) C=B log2 (1+1) C= B log2 (2) C=B 2 What are the purposes of the following GSM networks? VLR HLR MSC (home and visited) (6 marks) VLR: it is a database maintained
Premium Management Marketing Scientific method
Learning Team B Reflection: Week 3 IRAC Brief Learning Team B: Rhea Carson‚ Elspeth Flynn‚ Matthew Cable‚ Dusty Henson‚ Joseph Spurling LAW531 October 21‚ 2014 Janice Scott IRAC: Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons Case Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons Issue Whether first-sale doctrine codified in 17 U.S.C. § 109(a) is applicable to John Wiley & Sons copyrighted works manufactured and bought abroad‚ resold in the United States by Kirtsaeng without the owner’s permission. Is this a violation of the Copyright
Premium Copyright
ISSUE: Are the park homes at Bumpinyallup Caravan Park classified as Fixtures or Fittings? RULES: Fixtures are referred to by statue law as real property which is regulated by State and Territory Legislation. “Fixtures are something that has been or is or intended to be permanently attached to land to enhance the land in some way.” Nikolas James‚ Business Law‚ 2012 (1st) Edition (p. 444). Fittings are objects attached to land or buildings that are not Fixtures. The Case Law relevant to fixtures
Premium Term Law Landscape
Intro to Legal Environment Beachum v. White The West Virginia Record Background Facts: Leetta Beachum is the mother of Shana Cowley. Shana Cowley died from internal injuries on September 14‚ 2009. Injuries were sustained from leaping out of a moving vehicle. Timothy White was the boyfriend of Shana Cowley and the driver at the time when Cowley jumped from the moving vehicle. An altercation broke out between White and Cowley earlier that day‚ it continued when White picked up Cowley and
Premium The Road Automobile Jump
here—with a “yes” or “no‚” if possible—the court’s answer to the question (or questions) in the Issue section above. 5 Reason. Summarize as briefly as possible the reasons given by the court for its decision (or decisions) and the case or statutory law relied on by the court in arriving at its decision. An Example of a Brief Sample Court Case As an example of the format used in briefing cases‚ we present here a briefed version of the sample court case that was presented in Exhibit 1A–3 on page
Premium Law Appeal Tort
LEGAL WRITING: Using “IRAC” I. INTRODUCTION This handout sets out the basic paradigm‚ or organizational structure‚ of predictive legal analysis‚ referred to throughout this course as “IRAC.”1 IRAC is a general analytical paradigm; as you gain experience in your legal writing‚ you will be able to modify this paradigm to fit a particular legal issue. Once you understand the IRAC structure and are able to use it fluently‚ you can decide when it might be appropriate to modify the IRAC paradigm in a particular
Premium Law
Case Brief & IRAC Carrie "Shellie" Cobbs University of Phoenix LAW 531 Judge Stephen R. Ruddick April 28‚ 2015 Case Brief & IRAC Case Brief: Natasha Hallet was a veteran performer for Cirque du Soleil and performed numerous times without injury until one mistake that took place during a show in Orlando‚ FL changed all of that. While performing an aerial stunt‚ Ms. Hallet said that she forgot to rig her harness properly and that her partner missed her mistake during a routine safety check. Since
Premium Cirque du Soleil Tort
Tyler Womer Sports Law IRAC #1 9/9/14 Case 1: Moose v. MIT Issues: (1) Whether or not the defendants (MIT‚ Coach Taylor‚ & Coach Slovenski) were negligent with respect to their coaching techniques and the equipment they furnished to Garret Moose at the time he was injured. (2) Whether or not the harm was foreseeable. (3) Whether or not MIT was liable for the injured athlete. Rule: The jury found that each defendant‚ as well as the plaintiff‚ was negligent and that the defendants’ negligence
Premium Tort Tort law Law
Stress among Job Insecure Workers and Their Spouses Author(s): Stephan M. Wilson‚ Jeffry H. Larson and Katherine L. Stone Source: Family Relations‚ Vol. 42‚ No. 1 (Jan.‚ 1993)‚ pp. 74-80 Published by: National Council on Family Relations Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/584925 . Accessed: 17/08/2013 18:23 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use‚ available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit
Premium Regression analysis Family therapy Family
Learning Team IRAC Brief LAW/531 Learning Team B was tasked to study the IRAC method of case study analysis‚ and select one legal case from a current event that has taken place within the past two years relevant to this week’s objectives. After selecting a current case‚ Learning Team B prepared a case brief using the IRAC method. Learning Team B selected the United States v. Jones case‚ which was decided January 23‚ 2012. Learning Team B was also tasked to provide an explanation of how
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution