(GP2) Can breaking the law ever be justified? Imagine a world without those brave people who dared to not abide by the law and fight for a right. A world without Gandhi would be a world without independent India; without Mandela there would be white superiority in Africa; without freedom fighters‚ there would be no democracy in Nepal. I believe that all the actions of such law breakers are good‚ even though they were against various laws‚ and such actions can be justified to some extent. Even though
Premium Law Human rights Ku Klux Klan
Can terrorism ever be justified? Introduction The purpose of this essay is to explore the issues surrounding the morality of terrorism. I will begin by providing contextual information of the topic through exploring the history of terrorism. From the Sicarii in 50AD who carried out assassinations with short daggers to more recent attacks such as 7/7 bombings in the London underground. In this section however we will find it is not only the methodology of terrorism that has changed but its definition
Premium Terrorism Violence Aristotle
Adolf Hitler: Killing the Jews A global war occurred during 1939 to 1945‚ which resulted in the deaths of millions of people. When Adolf Hitler became the dictator of Germany in 1933‚ a genocide of Jews occurred under his control (Key). During World War II (WWII)‚ the Jews‚ homosexuals‚ and undesirable people were fenced into concentration camps (Key). In these camps‚ they were treated horribly and many were killed by the German police‚ Schutzstaffel (SS). The Germans were influenced by Hitler’s
Premium Nazi Germany The Holocaust Germany
Can breaking the law ever be justified? Any country or a place has its set of rules or laws. They are made in order to keep the place safe and peaceful. Some may have a set of rules while others may have rules that are open to changes and additions. These rules are set to govern people and keep them in discipline. However‚ as the saying goes ‘rules are meant to be broken’. Many people are found breaking these laws. No one in the world always follows the rule. It might be a small rule they might
Premium Law Crime Criminology
do to Fortunato. Montresor ’s desire causes him to thoroughly plan for his former friend ’s murder‚ but he is sensible and desires that his deeds will not damage him or his reputation. This is mainly because Montresor believes he is fully justified in killing Fortunato for his insults and thus should not be
Premium The Cask of Amontillado Edgar Allan Poe English-language films
Prompt: Referencing specific details from the play‚ identify whether you believe Brutus was justified for murdering Caesar‚ or whether you believe that Brutus made the wrong decision. You may also reference “The Soldier’s Dilemma” and/or current events to illustrate your point of view. Support your position thoroughly and logically. According to dictionary.com‚ trust is a “firm belief in the reliability‚ truth‚ ability‚ or strength of someone or something.” This concept is prevalent in the play
Premium Roman Republic Ancient Rome Julius Caesar
Is it ever ethically justified to torture a terrorist to save millions of innocent lives‚ or is it always unjustifiable to torture a person? Imagine one summer day when all the news stations broadcast a message saying that a terrorist has planted a nuclear bomb in New York City and that the bomb will detonate in approximately one hour and two million civilians will parish. The news then says that the terrorist has been captured‚ but the only way to find out the key information to stop the detonation
Premium September 11 attacks Terrorism Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Is censorship ever justified‚ if so‚ what are its limits? Censorship is a means whereby the information people receive is limited‚ either wholly or in part by another individual or a group or individuals. Censorship has occurred in varying forms for centuries and happens within all aspects of society; Parents and teachers censor what children see and read‚ the government censor the information available to the public and everybody‚ whether realise it or not partake in self-censorship. It is argued
Premium Censorship Freedom of speech
be confusing. Lying is a form of deception‚ but not all forms of deception are lies. Lying is giving some information while believing it to be untrue‚ intending to deceive by doing so. Whether lying is justified or not is a debate that goes back to the 1800s. I believe that lying is never justified because it causes harm to the victim‚ the liar‚ society‚ and it will increase the liar’s stress. First‚ lying is harmful to the liar and the victim. The victim suffers if they don’t find out because they
Premium Lie Truth Immanuel Kant
Despite the simplistic fact that King Charles I was the legally lawful leader of England‚ Parliament was more than justified in executing Charles I due to the divergent and passionate views of law and life between the people and the king in politics‚ society‚ and religion. Parliament never desired a position where they could control England with full-fledged power. They simply wanted enough limitations on the king’s power that would guarantee the people certain rights that the king
Premium Charles I of England Law