A10691383 Cultural relativism promotes understanding and acceptance of differences. Throughout history‚ various conflicts could have been lessened or avoided by encouraging cultural relativism. People throughout the world are greatly influenced by the cultural and environment in which they are raised. Moral and ethical standards and behavioral practices vary across cultures. Cultural relativism is an appealing theory; it should be the goal in terms of promoting tolerance and peace. Reaching that
Premium Morality Ethics
Rachels and Brock James Rachels’ thoughts on active and passive euthanasia come down to the idea that there is no moral difference between both active and passive euthanasia. That simply they are functionally equivalent. Rachels’ argument stems from the AMA’s stance on euthanasia. The AMA believes the intentional termination of one’s life is contrary to “that for which the medical profession stands.” However‚ it is wrong to prolong the needless suffering of patients who are dying. Therefore
Premium Death Euthanasia Medicine
the mid-twentieth century‚ that was the reality for wildlife after they were sprayed down with parathion. This chain of events stirred up trouble between environmentalists and people who relied on DDT. One of the advocates for the discontinuation‚ Rachel Carson‚ published a book called Silent Spring‚ which urges the readers to take action against the application of DDT through victimizing the animals‚ portraying the government and farmers as tyrants‚ and emphasizing the fragile balance between man
Premium Pesticide DDT Environmentalism
they are superior to another person‚ then that is taking it to far. Ethnocentrism‚ racism‚ and being a cultural relativist are all key components to a culture‚ and these three concepts allow a set of lens to be put on‚ that let people see a whole new perspective of culture. In light
Premium Culture Sociology Anthropology
James Rachels ’ Death and Dying James Rachels is one of the most controversial philosophers talked about in today ’s society. One of his most talked about topics is whether a person has a right to die or not. Not much is known about Rachels expect for the many articles and books he has written. In the controversy of letting a person die or killing him‚ he does not try to explain which method is good and which method is bad. He however tries to explain why they both are bad to a certain degree
Free Death Euthanasia Suicide
Ethics and the Bible In James Rachels’ “Ethics and the Bible‚” Rachels analyzes the use of the Bible to answer moral and ethical questions. He first points to the issue of clear teachings versus interpretations of the meaning behind. Those who use the Bible to answer ethical questions run into two problems‚ one that the Bible does not explicitly answer every ethical question‚ and two there are some instructions that religious people give reasons to ignore. Rachels finds this to be problematic. In
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
What is Morality. James Rachels is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Alabama and author of several books dating back to his first book End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality(1986). In Rachels essay “What is Morality- The Elements of Moral Philosophy”‚ Rachels believes that “minimum conception”(14) of morality is‚ at the very least‚ the effort to guide one’s conduct by reason while considering others who will be affected by it as well. This “minimum conception”(Rachels‚1) he urges‚ is a
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
Cultural relativism is simply explained as such that a culture of some sort has their own set of moral codes and beliefs where they all agree that whatever is the rules they must follow because they believe it is morally correct and ethical. For example‚ in the Philippines‚ president Rodrigo Duterte believes in the extrajudicial killings of drug users and drug dealers because it is morally right to cleanse their society from it. People in that culture believes that it is correct because they all
Premium Cultural relativism Culture Sociology
9/30/14 MRA: “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” In the text "The Challenge of Cultural Relativism‚" James Rachels breaks down and discusses the theory of Cultural Relativism by presenting the pros and cons of this theory. He exposes some of the shortcomings of the theory arguing that some of the claims are wrong and contradictory. The theory of Cultural Relativism states that “there is no such thing as universal truth in ethics; there are only the various cultural codes.” In other words‚ the
Premium Culture Cultural relativism Ethics
What are the challenges to the relativist position? Which one resonates with you most and why? The challenges one faces when supporting the relativist position are complex and variable‚ as there is no fine line that is applicable to all situations as a whole. The reasoning behind this is due to different cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds‚ which often represent different morals‚ values‚ ethics‚ and belief systems. All of those attribute and further point to the subjectivity and controversial
Premium Morality Ethics