On March 8th‚ I attended a hearing at the Federal Court. The case of Velu Nadarajanv Mirc et al. is a case related to a request to defer removal. The H&C application is based solely on the applicant’s establishment in Canada. Summary of the facts: The applicant is a Sri Lankan Tamil who is a failed refugee claimant. He has been living in Canada for just over 10 years and is scheduled to be removed by 8:50pm on the 8th of March 2024. The applicant works as a butcher and a fish cutter at a supermarket
Premium
Amendment explicitly states “No person shall…be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself”. The issue here was whether or not the conversation was in fact an interrogation based on the subdivision called the “functional equivalent” of questioning‚ described as ‘any words or actions on the part of the police that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect’. The court found that the conversation did not fall within the Miranda meaning
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Police United States
crimes. The police management also follows a component called service style in which the management stresses community service above law enforcement. But there is a differences between the organizations in this component as compared to corrections and courts. What are the roles‚ functions‚ and practices of the different personnel within the component? For the various personnel positions included in the component‚ are there guidelines established that outline their administrative duties? What are some
Premium Criminal justice Crime Police
more than any of his other possessions. This brings one to wonder how a man who was so obsessed by this particular company end up going to court against that company. This paper will inform you of the background of the infamous Howard Hughes‚ his involvement in Trans World Airlines‚ and the court case of Hughes vs. TWA. In order to understand the court case of Hughes vs. TWA one must understand a little about the background of Howard
Premium Space exploration Wright brothers Soviet Union
Korematsu v United States was a court case that argued that the orders provided to Korematsu were based on race only and were contradictory. Because they were only based on race‚ Korematsu argued they were unconstitutional. Korematsu argued he had contradictory orders‚ and‚ no matter what he did‚ he would have violated one of them. However‚ the United States argued that the government has different powers during peace time and war time. The government executed the orders to provide better security
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Moon v Whitehead (2015)‚ is a case dealing with the tort of trespass to person: battery. The appellant‚ Moon‚ appealed the decision of the trial court on the basis of consent. Moon claimed he received adequate consent from the respondent‚ Whitehead‚ while the two were in Sydney attending a work conference. He and the respondent shared an apartment with separate bedrooms for the period of the conference. The respondent pleaded that on 13 August 2007 the appellant came into her bedroom uninvited and
Premium Law Appeal Jury
hierarchy structure of courts. Each one of these courts has their own functions. The federal courts are formed by different levels. The United States Supreme Court is the top court in the USA. It is the final authority to appeal in all federal and state cases (Haire et al. 2003). The Supreme Court is the interpreter of federal constitutional laws. From the Supreme Court is the United States Court of Appeals. This is the appeal court of the federal judicial system. The court of appeal makes decisions
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Law
Federal v. State Courts The United States is at the forefront of modern democracy. Its unique three branched system allows the government to operate under a quasi-idealistic form of checks and balances. As outlined by the U.S. Constitution‚ the judicial branch of government serves as the interpreter of the law and is “one of the most sophisticated judicial systems in the world.”1 This complexity is a product of balance and structure in the form of a judicial hierarchy‚ with the Supreme Court at the top
Premium United States United States Constitution Law
Juvenile courts and adult courts are both similar and different in many ways. They’re mainly similar in putting away offenders or giving a punishment. Juvenile courts and adult courts are different in the way that juveniles are not put on trial for committing crimes‚ but for delinquent actions‚ and when the delinquent actions are very severe‚ then they could be considered crimes and the juvenile could be tried as an adult in the adult court system. Also juveniles don’t have the same right to a public
Premium Crime Criminology Criminal justice
a local Criminal District court and a nearby Justice of the Peace court‚ conclusions can be made about the construction and activities that occur in each courtroom. Criminal court proceedings compared to civil court proceedings are in many ways very different. The aura of the courtroom was entirely distinct between the two courts. The judge in the civil courtroom was more relaxed‚ and the vibe of the room itself was less intense than the criminal courtroom. Criminal court was much more tedious and
Premium Judge Law Jury