The plaintiff of this case is Harvest States Cooperatives and the defendant is Anderson. Harvest States Cooperatives sued Anderson for breach of contract‚ after Anderson failed to deliver 5‚000 bushels of corn. Anderson had spoken to a representative of the coop over the phone to inquire the price of corn which he had available for sale. Harvest States Cooperatives asked Anderson if he would like to see a contract and Anderson said yes. Following through‚ Harvest States Cooperatives sent Anderson
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract
Hayley Bilik Dr. Elizabeth S. Smith PSC-101-05 American Government February 6‚ 2017 The Environment: Supreme Court The Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in the United States‚ and its purpose is to ensure that the Constitution is followed correctly. The Court consists of nine justices‚ and has traditionally achieved higher approval ratings from the public as opposed to the President and Congress. Justices are selected through a vigorous system‚ combining factors such as merit‚ alignment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States President of the United States
opinions the court determines the final say. The Court must decide the case based off the Constitution and laws of the state‚ regardless of the judge’s personal preference‚ politics‚ and any other outside influence. (Y. M. Courts‚ About Your Courts) County courts or circuit courts are trial courts of limited jurisdiction. There is 30 judicial circuits in the state of Puerto Rico. Each circuit has the same divisions: small claims‚ juvenile‚ criminal‚ family‚ and probate. The trial courts of limited
Premium United States Law President of the United States
California Court System California is home to one of the largest court systems in the United States. Filing nearly nine million cases in its lifetime‚ the system has served over 37 million people (Darling). The California system can be separated into three branches. The first branch is known as the Supreme Court of California‚ and they are the state’s highest court. They review cases involving judgments of death and misconduct among attorneys. They also have the power to review cases that have
Premium United States Court Supreme Court of the United States
Juvenile Court Process CJS/220 Introduction to Criminal Court System July 9‚ 2014 In this assignment‚ I am required to explain the court process as it relates to the juvenile offenders in the criminal justice system. I think that first‚ it is very important to realize that there are many different outlets to consider when speaking on the ways in which the juvenile court process works. I think that we need to realize that there are different ways that a juvenile can be processed after
Free Crime Criminal justice Criminal law
Court History and Purpose CJA/224 May 17‚ 2012 Courteney Harris Court History and Purpose The court system in America has been around since the middle of the 1600’s and has played a crucial role in the development of how things are done when it comes to the criminal justice side. From today’s federal court and our typical state court‚ these dual court systems came about from a mutual agreement presented from our nation’s founders. In the last 200 years‚ states’ rights have gradually waned
Premium Law United States Judge
juvenile court and if the crime is more severe‚ an adult court may be more appropriate. The author will discuss the differences between adult and juvenile courts. Finally‚ it will discuss what can happen if juvenile courts are abolished and implications for young offenders. Compare and
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology
United States citizens because of the Supreme Court case‚ Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda was arrested for rape and kidnapping of a woman. Following his arrest‚ he was convicted based on his confession of the crime. Nevertheless‚ the Supreme Court ruled that his rights were violated according to the Fifth Amendment‚ which lead to his release. Reynolds Lancaster and Gina Jones were two authors that pointed importance of rights and issues related to the case Miranda v. Arizona‚ which lead to the Miranda
Premium Crime Police Law
The High Courts in Malaysia are the third-highest courts in the hierarchy of courts‚ after the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal. Article 121 of the Constitution of Malaysia provides that there shall be two High Courts of coordinate jurisdiction—the High Court in Malaya and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak (before 1994‚ the High Court in Borneo). Before 1969‚ the High Court in Singapore was also part of the Malaysian courts system (see Law of Singapore). The High Court in Malaya has
Premium Malaysia Appeal Judge
the court‚ The Dynamic and the Constrained Court. In the Dynamic Court‚ the court is viewed as the main arbiter of social change‚ were social reform can occur without the delay of other political institutions. For proponents of the Dynamic Court view‚ the landmark Supreme Court cases such as‚ Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade are viewed as some as some of the strongest pieces of evidence that the court is an exceptional tool for activists. But the inherent problem with Dynamic Court viewpoint
Premium Same-sex marriage Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution