AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (COLGIS) GFLA3124 INTERNATIONAL LAW ( A ) TITTLE : Lotus Case (1927) PCIJ Series A No 10 at 18 GROUP MEMBERS : Mohammed Asmawi Bin Othman 218895 Shafizree Bin Arbine 218916 Shamaladevi A/p Sivalingam 218928 Muhammad Zarif Ikhbal Bin Kamarudin 218933 LECTERUR : DR. RATNARIA BT WAHID TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 The Facts OF The Case.............................................................................................
Premium Jurisdiction Crime Criminal law
BOC CASE Yimin Tu 1. Using Kimmel et al.’s (2011) principles of control activities (described in Figure 6)‚ identify the internal control weaknesses that contributed to the BOC fraud incident. BOC has no independent internal verification. Bank managers had insider authority to make loans and transfer funds without controls. The former general manager at BOC Kaiping branch made loans and transferred fund to Ever Joint to pull in profits for himself. There is no second person to verify and supervise
Premium China Debt Bank
Question #1 states “Grisham identified four (4) United States supreme court (USSC) cases linked to the Fifth (5th) Amendment. Identify each case presented in the book and provide a one to two sentence statement about that case.” The first case discusses Hopt v. Utah in which the court stated “The supreme court ruled that a confession is not admissible if it is obtained by operating on the hopes or fears of the accused‚ and in doing so deprives him of the freedom of will or self-control necessary
Premium Crime Law Criminal law
Managerial Accounting and Control Semester 2‚ 2011 Individual Case Study Kanthal A (Weight: 10% of Final Grade) Due Date for submission: 4pm Friday 2nd September‚ 2011 Each student needs to complete a case study write-up and submit by the due date following the submission requirements outlined in the course profile (and provided below). Students need to address the following questions in their case study write-up for the Kanthal A case: 1. Describe the competitive environment in which
Premium Plagiarism Case study Cost
advice what actions she should take and relevant case law would be mentioned. Sarah give a lift to Ad to his workplace. She crashed her car and hit a bollard and another car on the road. To find if Sarah owes a duty of care‚ the Caparo test would be used. In order for a duty to impose a duty‚ there must be sufficient proximity. Ad and Sarah are both long standing friends‚ this shows that there is proximity between the two parties. This is shown in the case of Bourhill v Young. The court decided that
Premium Law Tort Negligence
Marketing case studies explain the purpose of the marketing function and the process of marketing planning. Case study topics covered include: The role of market research in analysing customer requirements SWOT analysis to map strengths‚ take advantage of opportunities or counter threats Setting marketing objectives - product- versus market-orientation Achieving balance in the marketing mix (product‚ price‚ place‚ promotion) to help achieve competitive advantage Which marketing strategies (Ansoff’s
Premium Marketing
CASE 9 SICK LEAVE NOTE: This material is also available as a role-play (Exercise 29‚ Sick Leave). Instructors are advised to use either the role-play or the case‚ but not both because they overlap considerably. Choosing whether to use the role-play or case materials depends on your goals for the class and the level of sophistication and cross-cultural experience of the students. For homogeneous classes with little previous cross-cultural experience‚ one option is to use the case to teach the
Premium Negotiation
Beverage Case Roles President Jack Johnson Driver Joe Stevens Sales manager Marsha Ketchum Accounting Jim Thomas Jason Rodgers operation manager The Company JBI Last year revenue 12 Million $ about 20 customers between 100.000 $ to over 1 million $ undiscounted list price was 15‚20$per case of 25 full cost Excluding customer service was 13‚10$ per case Case situation Saver Superstone one of Johnson Beverage largest customers want discount ABC for JBI Saver Superstore
Premium Sales Customer service Customer
1. Why was the Crippen case important? • The Crippen case was important because it was a landmark case‚ and the first trial by media‚ it was known for being the crime of the century‚ and also the first to be dominated by forensic science. 2. What was Crippen accused of? Why was he accused of this crime? • Crippen was accused of poisoning and dismembering his wife. He was accused of this crime because he was the victim’s husband and she has had affairs before. 3. Why do you think people were
Premium Forensic science Victim Crime
Barron V. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 1833 7 vote(s) for Mayor and City Council‚ 0 vote(s) against *Background of case: *the case began with a lawsuit from John Barron against Baltimore stating that it deprived him of his property which violates the Fifth Amendment. It proves that the government cannot take private property with just compensation. The court found that Baltimore deprived him of his private property and gave him $4‚500. It was later reversed but then appealed to the Supreme
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States