Case Brief By: Ashley Tam R. v. Martineau (1991)‚ 58 C.C.C. (3d) 353 (S.C.C.) Facts: The appellant‚ Martineau‚ was convicted of second-degree murder under s. 213(a) and (d) of the Criminal Code but the decision was overturned by the Alberta Court of Appeal who concluded that s. 213(a) violated ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and could no longer be in effect. The issue was brought before the Supreme Court of Canada whether or not the appeal court was correct in
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Abortion Canada
Case: R v. Hebert Facts of Case Judges: Dickson‚ Robert George Brian; Lamer‚ Antonio; Wilson‚ Bertha; La Forest‚ Gérard V.; L’Heureux-Dubé‚ Claire; Sopinka‚ John; Gonthier‚ Charles Doherty; Cory‚ Peter deCarteret; McLachlin‚ Beverley Neil Hebert was suspected of having robbed the Klondike Inn. After the police located Hebert‚ they placed him under arrest and informed him of his rights‚ and took him to the R.C.M.P detachment in Whitehorse. Hebert contacted counsel and obtained legal advice regarding
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Police
1.) The legal issue in R V Brown case that the house of lord had to determine was "Is consent a defence to an assault causing grievous bodily harm" This is a case of sado-masochism where the group of men were engaged in act of violence against each other particularly on their genital parts‚ by branding or genital torture for sexual pleasure. The victims in each case consented to this ritual (activity) and didn’t suffer any permanent injury. Each of the defendants faced assault ABH charges and unlawful
Premium Law Human rights
on PepsiCo‚ Inc. By applying full information forecast‚ PepsiCo‚ Inc as of December 31‚ 2007 was $110.99. The stock market price on the same date was $75.49. We believe PepsiCo stock is undervalued. Three evaluation methods are used in evaluation process – ReOI ‚ AOIG‚ and DCF. We get same result on all three methods. Simple valuation method is also used‚ we reached a comparable result of $110.62. KEY DRIVER’S FORECAST WACC is forecasted at 7.32 using CAPM. In the last 5 years‚ PepsiCo maintained
Premium Revenue
References: • Available at: http://www.pepsico.com/Company/Our-Mission-and-Vision.html (accessed 10 April 2010) • Available at: http://www.pepsico.com/Company/PepsiCo-Values-and-Philosophy.html (accessed 10 April 2010) • Available at:http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~sl659598/esp/memo2.htm (accessed 10 April 2010) • Available at:http://media.corporateir.net/media_files/irol/78/78265/pepsicoreclassifiedoperating.pdf (accessed
Premium Pepsi Profit margin Strategic management
PepsiCo ’s Diversification Strategy in 2008 PepsiCo was the world ’s largest snack and beverage company‚ with 2007 net revenues of approximately $39.5 billion. The company ’s portfolio of businesses in 2008 included Frito-Lay salty snacks‚ Quaker Chewy granola bars‚ Pepsi soft drink products‚ Tropicana orange juice‚ Lipton Brisk tea‚ Gatorade‚ Propel‚ SoBe‚ Quaker Oatmeal‚ Cap ’n Crunch‚ Aquafina‚ Rice-A-Roni‚ Aunt Jemima pancake mix‚ and many other regularly consumed products. Company History
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola
PepsiCo‚ Organized Trade BY‚ GAURAV PRATAP SINGH (ROLL NO 15) EBREZ (ROLL NO 16) PepsiCo Organized Trade: The Beverage Industry is a mature sector and includes companies that market nonalcoholic and alcoholic items. Since growth opportunities are few compared to existing business‚ many members of the
Premium Coffee Drink Customer
Litonjua v. L&R Corporation December 9‚ 1999 Facts: Litonjua obtained loans from L&R Corporation secured by a mortgage. Without knowledge of L&R‚ Litonjua sold to PWHAS the parcels of land they had previously mortgaged to L & R Corporation. When Litonjua defaulted in the payment of their loans‚ L & R Corporation initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings and L & R Corporation was the only bidder. When L & R Corporation presented its corresponding Certificate of Sale for registration‚ it
Premium Mortgage
Strategic Management PepsiCo: Strategy Audit Strategic Management PepsiCo: Strategy Audit Group 7 Members: Darsana Nair Mustafa Kazem Rashed Al-Rashed Tolegen Kuandykov Shawn Berg Mazen El Hechi Group 7 Members: Darsana Nair Mustafa Kazem Rashed Al-Rashed Tolegen Kuandykov Shawn Berg Mazen El Hechi INTRODUCTION: This case study will analyse the fast moving consumer goods industry (FMCG) as well as perform firm level analysis for of PepsiCo‚ a leading global food and
Premium Pepsi Product management Marketing
In R v Hoyle (No 2)‚ the Court considers the sentencing of the offender‚ Arthur Hoyle‚ who was found guilty of an act of indecency without consent and sexual intercourse without consent. While determining an appropriate sentence‚ the Court had reference to three medical reports tendered on behalf of the offender‚ the authors of which each had “a different speciality.” The medical history of the offender and the subsequent diagnosis provided by the medical reports presented a unique challenge to the
Premium Law Jury Judge