American courts have carefully expanded mandatory disclosure by the prosecutor‚ especially with respect to disclosures of exculpatory evidence and impeachment material. Exculpatory evidence is any evidence that might exonerate the defendant at trial by either tending to cast doubt on defendant’s guilt or by tending to mitigate the defendant’s culpability‚ thereby potentially reducing the defendant’s sentence (David W. Neubauer & Henry F. Fradella). In Brady v. Maryland‚ he U.S Supreme Court held that
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brady v. Maryland Criminal law
The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella‚ n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar‚ a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore‚ a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at
Premium Murder Crime Law
question whether he states the type of the test used‚ and the total waste discharged per a timeframe not by discharged unit only. Moreover‚ since Jackson was summoned to meet with the city engineers‚ is the new test legally required to support any case‚ and if so‚ would Z-CORP be held liable for regulation violation taking the new test.
Premium
CASE TITLE: JOHN WOLFORD (A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: When a former upper-middle-level engineering manager of Precision Instruments company‚ was acquired by the Eurotech Ltd’‚ a European multinational ‚ John Wolford becomes the vice president and general manager‚ he finds his new role more stressful. There are complaints from workers protesting the new climate survey he initiated in an attempt to learn more about how employees feel. Also EEOC regulations have forced him to study how well his employees
Premium Management Vice President of the United States
children Ann Forest‚ Eugene‚ Catherine Elisabeth‚ John Francis‚ Matthew‚ Margaret Jane‚ Christopher James‚ Paul David and Mary Clare. Antonin Scalia received his associate bachelors from Georgetown University and his Literally Legum Baccalaureus at Harvard Law School. In 1970 he became a part of President Richard Nixon’s general counsel and in addition became the Assistant Attorney General. In 1983‚ Antonin Scalia became a part of Ronald Regan’s court of appeals. President Ronald Reagan then nominated
Premium United States New Jersey Supreme Court of the United States
The Pamela Smart Case 24 year old Gregory Smart was shot dead in his New Hampshire condominium‚ which what appeared to be a botched burglary‚ just one week before his first wedding anniversary. Six weeks later William Flynn‚ age of 16‚ Vance Lattime‚ age of 17 and Patrick Randall‚ age of 18 were arrested and charged with the murder‚ all three pleaded guilty. However‚ to reduce their sentences the teenagers agreed to testify against the person they claimed persuaded them to carry out the killing:
Premium Murder Life imprisonment
sentence will have to wait at least another two weeks to learn if he will be granted judicial release. Delane A. Goodwin‚ 44‚ who has been serving his sentence at Richland Correctional Institution‚ sat in Common Pleas Court Judge Robert Rinfret’s courtroom Wednesday while his attorney‚ John Johnson Jr.‚ and Prosecutor Steve Knowling talked with the judge about the hearing behind closed doors. Rinfret informed Goodwin there would be no judicial release hearing because the prosecutor filed a motion objecting
Premium
The Evolving Stance of Segregation In Plessy v Ferguson the court ruled that segregation was constitutional so long as the provided separate facilities were equal. For the next fifty eight years‚ states created laws that supported their own policies of segregation. Known as Jim Crow Laws‚ these laws continued to discriminate against African Americans across nation. It was not until 1954 when the case Brown v Board of Education when the court reached a decision to overturn segregation and ruled unconstitutional
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
1ST SLIDE: Identity theft starts with the misuse of a person’s personally identifying information‚ such as name and Social Security number‚ credit card numbers or other financial account information. For identity thieves‚ this information is as good as gold. 2ND SLIDE: What do thieves do with a stolen identity? Once they have your personal information‚ identity thieves use it in a variety of ways. Credit card fraud: They may open new credit card accounts in their victim’s name. When they
Premium Identity theft Credit card fraud
often perform “Terry stops”‚ as part of the work routinely associated with police patrol. In policing the term “Terry Stops” which refers to the “stop and frisk” practice‚ was coined in 1968‚ and derives from the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio‚ 392 U.S. 1(1968) . In that landmark case‚ it was ruled that the Fourth Amendment constitutional right‚ made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment‚ that prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures” of individuals by American government
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Terry v. Ohio