Introduction The law to recklessness has developed and changed over a very long time and for much of this time the two types of recklessness have been Cunningham Recklessness and Caldwell recklessness ‚ however this has recently changed. In this essay I am going to talk about the history of recklessness‚ how the case of R v G and another 2003 has affected it and the proposals for reform which were considered as a result of the case. The History on the Law on Recklessness The law on recklessness
Premium Law Criminal law Appeal
employment of judges and their terms in office. In the Vietnam court system‚ the judges approval is done by the assembly and appointed by the head of state. The judges then have a term of five years in the office like the government which appointment them to work. This is similar to the united state court system where the Supreme Court‚ the court of appeal and the district court judges are appointed to the office by the president of the United State with the approval of the senate. Mostly judges the ruling
Premium Judge Supreme Court of the United States United States
as ultimate appellate courts to safeguard liberal rights and to protect their citizens from arbitrary governmental powers under the rule of law. The quality of these courts is underpinned by the ‘impartiality‚ integrity‚ and independence’ of the judges‚ which depends largely on the framework of judicial appointments. This paper argues that Australia should not adopt a similar mechanism to that used in the Supreme Court of the United States‚ where the Senate must confirm judicial appointments
Premium Separation of powers Judiciary Law
CONTEMPT OF COURT Introduction: In a democracy people should have right to criticize judges. The purpose of should not be to upheld the majesty and dignity of the court but only to enable it to function. Anything that curtails or impairs the freedom of limits of the judicial proceedings must of necessity result in hampering of the administration of Law and in interfering with the due course of justice. This necessarily constitutes contempt of court. Oswald defines contempt to be constituted by
Premium Judge Contempt of court Narmada Bachao Andolan
Article V titled Judiciary. County Courts Judges differed based on community population and caseload for each county. Each county court judges must a registered voter of the specified county that are requesting office of and a member of the Florida Bar for five years; however districts with an inhabitants of 40‚000 or less the person is only required to be a member of the Florida Bar. According to "Florida State Courts" (n.d.)‚ " County judges are eligible for assignment to circuit court
Premium Judge Court Appeal
Fair trial If the prosecutor‚ while working out a file‚ appreciates that a criminal lawsuit must be initiated‚ then he/she shall send a copy after the resolution for the initiation of the criminal lawsuit to the suspect person involved in the precursory criminal investigation‚ a person who‚ under the circumstances‚ becomes a defendant. The resolution shall be motivated. Also‚ when a person is summoned before a criminal investigation body or a court of law‚ a summoning notice is
Premium Jury Law Judge
for campaign support in his upcoming election‚ and the man proceeding to agree that while he had no intention of becoming involved with the judges’ campaign‚ that he supports it. After stating that Mr. Smith has been present in his courtroom a number of times‚ the judge then asks for Mr. Smith’s financial support for his ongoing campaign to be elected as judge‚ which Mr. Smith reluctantly agrees to. Jefferson uses this as a prime example of how power and finances both play influential roles within
Premium Law United States Judge
position. Whether |job is not always to seek convictions (although it often | | |local or federal‚ the prosecutor’s job is to |is). A prosecutor’s job is to seek justice‚ which may not| | |convince a judge and a jury that law enforcement has|always be a conviction. Sometimes justice is a dismissal | | |brought the right person to trial for judgment and |or a reduction in charge | |
Premium Jury Law Judge
justice is usually dependent on how the judge views the constitution. There are two main theories of how the constitution is viewed. The first theory is an originalism view. This views the constitution rigidly‚ and that America has to enforce the constitution by the original meaning. Originalism ensures that the original meaning is enforced‚ by using the old dictionary definitions if the words. This originalist interpretation is more common amongst conservative judges. The next theory is the living constitution
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
in the court of law. The Court is the second component. The Court is the second line of action in the justice system and means just as much as the law enforcement. The court system consists of the prosecution and defense lawyers‚ many judges and juries. Each of these persons make sure those accused of
Premium Law Police Criminal justice