QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Should Jack Thompson be held in contempt of court under Michigan law for the statements he made in a letter sent to the media and Judge Friedman two days after rejecting Thompson’s action initiated against Take-Two in an effort to stop the release of the video game "Bully?" II. Under the Michigan statute‚ should the game "Bully" be held a public nuisance harmful to public health‚ affecting public morals? BRIEF ANSWERS I. Yes. Jack Thompson should be held in contempt
Premium Contempt of court Judge Court
the registrar office of a District court through the Head of the Clerk Court. Afterwards‚ the head of the District Court will resume the claim in relation to appoint a single judge or a panel of judges to examine the case. Generally‚ a lot of cases are heard and examined by a panel with three judges. The appointed judge or judges will sit for hearings‚ examinations‚ and‚ finally‚ will issue a decision. The court will schedule dates of hearings and will summon parties to appear before the court. However
Premium Judge Legal terms Court
the people present and give a brief description of their role and what you observed them do in the courtroom during your visit. The participants in the courtroom were; the judge‚ the defence‚ the crown prosecutor‚ the court reporter‚ the judge’s associate‚ the court officer‚ the offender and the offender’s family. The Judge‚ who is addressed as Your Honour‚ was seated at the highest bench in the middle of the
Free Jury Trial Appeal
The Texas Judicial system is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons. The system is not liked by everybody because of the way it selects our judges. When comparing it to other states outside of Texas‚ it is different in many ways. For years many citizens and government officials have fought to reform the system. Many have failed‚ been rejected and have given up‚ while others take rejection has a reason to fight harder and fix the Judicial system. The Texas Judicial system is
Premium Judge Supreme Court of the United States Law
Legislative Branch Of Brunei: Under the 1959 constitution there was an elected Legislative Council‚ but only one election has ever been held‚ in 1962. Soon after that election‚ the assembly was dissolved following the declaration of a state of emergency‚ which saw the banning of the Brunei People’s Party. In 1970 the Council was changed to an appointed body by decree of the Sultan. In 2004 the Sultan announced that for the next parliament‚ fifteen of the 20 seats would be elected. However‚ no date
Premium Judge Law Court
existential threats. But I do not think that the difficulties are insurmountable. We are a tenacious nation‚ have demonstrated‚ more than once‚ our strength and ability to face challenges. The lawyers’ movement for restoration of independent-minded judges and supremacy of law/Constitution is a case in point. The movement for a grand cause was thronged by enthusiastic groups including civil society organisations‚ professional groups‚ political parties and students‚ etc. In the evening of 15 March 2009
Free Judge Court Law
Evaluating the use of lay people‚ judges‚ and lawyers within the legal system There are different roles in the legal system. The difference between judges‚ juries and magistrates is that magistrates are people from the public that are unpaid‚ an unqualified volunteer and has had no legal training. However‚ judges are professionals that are qualified and have been legal experts of many years standing. A jury is a panel of citizens who are not experts on law/legal system. A magistrate is a volunteer
Free Judge Jury Law
June 11‚ 2011 Lok Pal and Judiciary A key aspect of the current debate about Lok Pal is about whether the Judiciary should be brought under the jurisdiction of Lok Pal. This issue figured prominently even in the consensus-building effort ‘Round Table on Lok Pal’ held in New Delhi‚ on April 24‚ 2011. There was a broad consensus among the participants that the accountability and probity in higher judiciary should be ensured‚ but through a separate and powerful mechanism of National Judicial Commission
Premium Judge
implications would need to be considered before any changes in the law were to occur. The adversarial system is “an adjudication by a neutral‚ passive and non-interventionist judge and court” (Natalie Cuffe‚ 2004). Basically‚ the lawyers and the clients of each party present the case in the client’s best interest‚ while a judge listens impartially without doing a great deal of further research. The make a judgment if there is no jury and determine questions of law. When there is a jury present‚ these
Premium Jury Common law Law
conservative‚ liberal‚ and moderate; this field is the metaphysical standpoints employed by judges to interpret laws. Theses recounts to the United States Supreme Court and the US courts and how the honesties and also the judges who work in those courts apply their belief systems. Judicial philosophy is extremely important because they decide which judges are agreed to unique court arrangements. Despite the fact that few judges observe to a precise viewpoint‚ most have a complete attitude that is conservative
Premium Law Judge Separation of powers