precedent means that judges declare what the existing law is. However many people think that judges actually make law‚ especially in the High Court of Australia. Write an essay of 1000 words stating whether you believe judges should make law and mention some arguments for and some arguments against this idea. I am of the opinion that judges in Australian courts should make law‚ within specified boundaries. Through the doctrine of precedent‚ the decisions that judges make in cases before
Free Common law Law Judge
government thus became small.[4] Nevertheless‚ kings could still influence courts and dismiss judges. The Stuart dynasty used this power frequently in order to overpower Parliament. After the Stuarts were removed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688‚ some advocated guarding against royal manipulation of the judiciary. King William III finally approved the Act of Settlement 1701‚ which established tenure for judges unless Parliament removed them.[5] Under the unwritten British Constitution‚ there are two
Premium Judge Law United Kingdom
pass for a civil or criminal proceeding to have a voice in court. Appellate courts have authority to reassess findings decided on at trial court level. There are four essential parts amidst trial and appellate courts: purpose‚ evidence‚ juries‚ and judges (Ehow.com‚ 2012). Purpose Trial court focuses on finding the facts in determining the best decision for the case brought forth. The focus for appellate court is quite different since the facts in the proceeding came from trial court level
Premium Court Law Jury
never used offensive language whenever they have objections during the examination of the witnesses. III. Lawyer and Courts c. Observations viii. Treat Personnel with respect ix. No sign of any disgust or disrespect to Judge Danilo Galvez‚ despite approval of the latter of postponement of his case. x. Pursuant to 10.03‚ procedure‚ there was no showing that any of the lawyers violated any procedural rules of the court. xi. Pursuant to canon 11 and the
Premium Lawyer Judge Prosecutor
distinct between the two courts. The judge in the civil courtroom was more relaxed‚ and the vibe of the room itself was less intense than the criminal courtroom. Criminal court was much more tedious and lengthy than hearings in civil court. The criminal court contained a better constructed and more interactive courtroom workgroup‚ had cases that were created in a more orderly fashion‚ and its cases were more investigated by lawyers
Premium Judge Law Jury
reasoning can occur in the courtroom when people are put on trial and the judge and the jury must delve into the life of the accused and determine if he is a hazard to society. Occasionally‚ the judge and jury are too concerned with the accused’s past that they become too biased and give an unfair conviction and sentencing. In his novel‚ The Stranger‚ Albert Camus uses the courtroom as a symbol to represent society that judges the main character‚ Meursalt‚ unfairly to illustrate how society forms opinions
Free Judge Jury Human
some examples of ethnicity-based jury nullification‚ a sanctioned doctrine of trial proceedings wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented of the instructions of the judge in order to reach a verdict based upon their own consciences. It espouses the concept that jurors should be the judges of both law and fact. Ethnicity in court is an important factor depending were your venue of court is located‚ and the jurors selected to the court. If in a court room there are jurors that
Free Jury Judge Law
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Should Jack Thompson be held in contempt of court under Michigan law for the statements he made in a letter sent to the media and Judge Friedman two days after rejecting Thompson’s action initiated against Take-Two in an effort to stop the release of the video game "Bully?" II. Under the Michigan statute‚ should the game "Bully" be held a public nuisance harmful to public health‚ affecting public morals? BRIEF ANSWERS I. Yes. Jack Thompson should be held in contempt
Premium Contempt of court Judge Court
the registrar office of a District court through the Head of the Clerk Court. Afterwards‚ the head of the District Court will resume the claim in relation to appoint a single judge or a panel of judges to examine the case. Generally‚ a lot of cases are heard and examined by a panel with three judges. The appointed judge or judges will sit for hearings‚ examinations‚ and‚ finally‚ will issue a decision. The court will schedule dates of hearings and will summon parties to appear before the court. However
Premium Judge Legal terms Court
the people present and give a brief description of their role and what you observed them do in the courtroom during your visit. The participants in the courtroom were; the judge‚ the defence‚ the crown prosecutor‚ the court reporter‚ the judge’s associate‚ the court officer‚ the offender and the offender’s family. The Judge‚ who is addressed as Your Honour‚ was seated at the highest bench in the middle of the
Free Jury Trial Appeal