counteractive to the pure logical reason that legal formalism upholds. Legal realists determine that pure logic alone will never be pertinent in every litigation proceeding. Cases will arise when the judge will be required to account for extraneous factors that will not be considered when a formalist judge is at watch. Point of difference between the two methods being that a legal realist advocates the necessity of judicial interpretation while a legal formalist would contend that the law should be algorithmic
Premium Law Justice Judge
and once people stepped out they were more openly communicating and laughing. Another expectation before arriving at the courtroom was the judge would be nice and pleasant and will respect the defendant and make them feel comfortable. But I observed the judge was behaved in the opposite manner he was rude and hostile which collaborates with our readings of judge portraying bias and unprofessional behaviour. I was also expecting to see at least one case where the defendant pleads not guilty but I was
Premium Jury Law Lawyer
box is where the people come into the court‚ the judge watches them and the jury watches back. A jury is the place where the bargain struck. A jury attends in judgment not only upon the accused but also upon the justice and humanity of the law. The role of the jury is the jury make decision based on the fact while matters based on law is the signory of judge. The jury makes decision based on their understanding of the law explained by the judge. Then‚ they have to apply the law to the facts. And
Premium Law Jury Common law
Bell? The Supreme Court Judge Eugene Benton forewarned McKenzie Crowe that she could actually get fifteen years in confinement. The Judge handed down the case to the prosecutor‚ who advised McKenzie that she has up to four years to file for habeus corpus. The prosecutor then proceeded to ask McKenzie if she gives up her rights and pleads guilty. After reading McKenzie her Miranda rights she suggests for the states recommendation for counts two and counts four. The Judge then read the Miranda rights
Premium Alcohol law Supreme Court of the United States Law
three judges that make a determination with a majority
Premium Court United States Judge
consists of a Chief Justice and other judges. There is no fixed number regarding the judges of the High Courts. The President may also appoint a qualified person as an additional judge in a High Court for two years. Appointment: The judges of the High Court are appointed by the President of India. The President appoints the Chief Justice of a High Court after consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Governor of the State. Qualifications: To be a judge of a High Court one must be : •
Premium Judge Supreme Court of the United States Court
appellate jurisdiction is when a court hears a case on appeal from a lower court. The Supreme Court has both original and appellate juridiction. 2.What role should judicial philosophy play in selecting federal judges? Judicial philosophy will play a role when the president goes to select federal judges‚ he will select one that goes along with his thoughts and beliefs. 3.(a) Why did the Framers see a need for a national court system? (b) Why did the Framers believed that an independent judiciary
Premium Judge United States United States Constitution
issues of the constitutional position of the judiciary and the significance of judicial independence for the operation of the rule of law. We will consider recent changes to the leadership of the judiciary and the process of judicial appointment. Judges are expected to be personally independent in the sense that they must decide cases purely on the strict application of the law to the evidence presented‚ irrespective of personal preference or any interest in the outcome. They must be fearless in
Premium Judge Augusto Pinochet Supreme Court of the United States
that such order was not amenable to the jurisdiction of Supreme Court under Article 136. The decision of the Bench of the three learned Judges affirmed this view in Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Mehul Construction Co.‚ [2000]. Thereafter‚ in the present case‚ a Bench of two learned Judges referred to a larger Bench the decision of the three learned Judges for re-consideration. This is how the matter came to before a Constitution Bench. Two issues which were to be decided in this case was-
Premium Judge Arbitration Court
petty reality shows.” We also find that cable TV play a large part in how the judicial system has allowed the media to weave their way into the courtroom. Judge Jane Marum Roush‚ of Fairfax County Va. was asked by several TV reporters if they could take still photos of a court case in which an 18 year old was accused of a vicious killing‚ Judge Roush declined by stating… [1] “The public’s right to know” [is] a “right” that is not enunciated in the constitution‚ she also stated that these cameras
Free Judge Jury Court