But this system was not perfect; the appointment procedure of judges was faulty. Executive became judge and judge became executive vice versa because of lack of experience judiciary suffered as executive failed to do justice to judiciary. In 1868‚ company officers pointed out that native judges and pleaders who had received a regular legal education at the Calcutta University had a better knowledge than the civilian‚ executive judges. Therefore Bengal officers proposed the establishment of a
Free Judge Court Jurisdiction
mainly supreme court cases‚ of how should the judges determine the outcome. Should the judges go strictly based off what the law states or should they interpret the law according to how they believe will be correct. Some notable supreme court cases being‚ Brown vs Board of Education‚ Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association‚ and Korematsu v. US. Most siding with judicial activism over restraint‚ due to the public’s views changing along with the judges changing. I believe choosing judicial activism
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States Constitution
state of Texas‚ the Supreme Court‚ the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott‚ 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court‚ nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger‚ 121). Moreover‚ it is worth mentioning
Premium Supreme court Judge Court
and that included a 1 hour lunch‚ evidence‚ questioning and the judgment to take place. . There was not much waiting around and the whole case was to the point as through Expertise The judge who was appointed to the case for unfair dismissal was a specialist in this area she specialised in. Off the record the judge mentioned to us that this particular case was a difficult one as it involved one employee and one employer which meant she was dealing with a delicate situation. This was due to it involving
Premium Law Employment Judge
applied to future cases‚ similar to this. Judges look at a previous case‚ which is similar and in an equal or higher court and they will then use this information to decide
Premium Common law Law Judge
US Government – Regular and Honors Chapter 18 – The Judicial System (17 Points Total) Chapter 18‚ Section 1 (6 Points) For the following chart‚ fill in the appropriate information |Term |Define | | |Cases can be heard only in the federal courts. | |Exclusive Jurisdiction
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Judge Law
is the judicial selection process. The qualifications‚ method of selection and election and removal from the bench vary from state to state. The average person would believe there would be a Constitutional or statutory qualification to serve as a judge. This is not the case in the United States (Judicial Process in America 8th edition pg. 125 chapter 6). The states of Pennsylvania and Arizona have their own agenda when it comes to the judicial selection process. In the state of Pennsylvania justices
Premium Judge Supreme Court of the United States United States
that is not completely obsolete‚ but takes is less of a primary concern as it were‚ compared to other factors that effect a case. Those who are in favour of judicial activism argue that social change has increased the need for legal change and judges need to be able to make decisions considering external factors and using processes other than the law that make judicial method more subjective‚ adhering to legislation and legal policy but giving more significant acknowledgement to situational factors
Free Law Judge
dominant power. The source of law in Australia is coming from two resources which are courts and parliament. Courts enact the judge-made law‚ also called common law‚ Parliament lays down statutory law. From s109 of the Cth Constitution law‚ when there is a contradiction between common law and State legislation‚ common law “prevails”. Common law is stare decisis‚ it allows judges apply doctrine of precedent to later cases having similar facts. When interpreting the law‚ courts makes decisions based on
Free Common law Law Supreme court