last name. When my sister’s name was called‚ we entered the court room and she went to the front and sat down on a table. The foreman started off by stating everyone who was present in the court including the judge and stated the case. The prosecutor began the proceeding by telling the judge what happened according to the police report‚ and why my sister was being charged. The prosecutor then called the cop to the stand. After being sworn in‚ the cop described to the prosecutor about he pulled my
Premium Court Lawyer Judge
FICTION VERSUS REALITY Fiction versus Reality: To Kill a Mockingbird Debra Gonzalez University of Phoenix Axia Introduction to Criminal Court Systems CJS220 Heidi Scott‚ MS December 31‚ 2009 Fiction versus Reality: To Kill A Mockingbird For many Americans‚ television‚ and film are a glance into the world. Television can influence a persons’ imagery of daily events‚ and has become a main source of media information. Films are frequently‚ intentionally‚ pretending to depict a fact
Free Law Judge Court
While I accept that theoretically a judge should not consider extralegal factors when making a ruling‚ I cannot accept your premise that all judges rule as neutral arbiters who rely solely on precedent‚ Constitutional text‚ and original intent of the Framers. As with any other individual in public service‚ judges are still human beings‚ and thus bring with them their own prejudices‚ personal biases‚ and preconceived notions when taking the bench. This is not to say that they do not have the intent
Premium Law Morality Ethics
1.1 The court visit and its general role in the English Legal system. The court visited was ‘Uxbridge Magistrates Court and Uxbridge Youth Court’‚ which is managed by the ministry of justice. The magistrates’ court is one of the courts at the lowest level of court hierarchy. It deals with offences with are regarded as less serious offences. Cases in the magistrates ’ courts are usually heard by a panel of magistrates (Justices of the Peace). This court must normally be composed of not more than
Premium Judge Jury Law
do it‚ my knees were weak‚ and my stomach was doing somersaults. I glanced nervously to Luke and Ria who had come along for support‚ their faces summed up my feelings; despair and helplessness. “Please state your name and current address.” The judge spat down from her plinth. I mumbled my way through it‚ my nerves were very apparent in the faltering of my voice as if it were about to break. The charges were read out‚ 8 offences in total. This was my 3rd appearance in court as it had been
Premium Judge Feeling
rules‚ procedures‚ and correct forms to file‚ at this point I became frustrated and looked to focus blame on the system for my frustrations. With no help during this time the ignorance slowed the process of my argument in court. I felt as though the judge had it out for me and didn’t want me to see my daughter. Why was I being denied the right to be a parent for my daughter? If I only had the help needed to properly file the motions required I could get my interest heard and the results I was seeking
Free Law Judge Family law
the highest court is the U.S. Supreme court which is located in the state of Washington‚ D.C. Supreme courts only hears cases on appeal from lower courts. The courtroom is made up comprised of professional courtroom personal.‚ which include the judge‚ the defense counsel‚ the court reporter‚ the prosecuting attorney‚ the clerk of the court the local court administrator‚ the bailiff and the expert witness.[Also present in the courtroom for a trial are “outsides” non professional courtroom participants
Premium Jury Court Supreme Court of the United States
attended to court 20 of the fifth floor which there was a civil case about a car incident. The layout of the courtroom was simple there was no raised layers except from the judge’s. Also there was not defendant’s box and no presence of police. The judge was a middle-aged‚ middle-class‚ white male. The public sat on the back of the court room. The case I have
Premium Court Manchester Jury
included Kent’s criminal history and the serious nature of the current charges. Kent’s lawyer‚ of course‚ wanted the case to stay in juvenile court. Had the judge allowed a hearing‚ Kent’s lawyer would have argued that his client was mentally ill. He would have said this fact should be considered before determining which trial court to use. Yet the judge made the decision without holding a hearing. The adult court tried Kent and found him guilty of the charges. His sentence was 30 to 90 years in prison
Premium Court Judge Supreme Court of the United States
the judge and explain his title at the time this case was heard. The active judge‚ Justice Rein was seeing this case. At present his Honour Nigel Geoffrey Rein is an admiralty list judge of the supreme courts equity division. (Supreme court of New South Wales‚ 2013) However‚ at the time the case of Peter Smythe v Vincent Thomas [2007] NSWSC 844 (3 August 2007)‚ Justice Rein was a district court judge as an acting chief justice. It was not until May 5th 2008 that he was sworn in as a judge of the
Premium Jury Law Court