Chapter 4 Introduction to Probability Case Problem: Hamilton County Judges The data in the table provides the basis for the analysis. We provide notes as a guide to answering questions 1 through 5. 1. The conditional probabilities of cases being appealed in the three courts are given in the 3 Total rows in the table. For Common Pleas Court‚ the probability of an appeal is .0401; for Domestic Relations Court‚ the probability of an appeal is .00348; and for Municipal Court‚ the
Premium Court Appeal Ranking
Should voters elect judges or should they be appointed? It would be better if a chief executive like a governor‚ mayor or county executive nominated judges vetted for their professional qualifications and judicial outlook. When it was first introduced‚ the idea of electing judges was meant as a way to avoid corruption‚ but it seems to have the opposite effect today. Holding judicial elections requires judges to campaign for their seats‚ which can adversely impact their ability to make independent
Premium Law Judge Elections
Judge Nunley held the court cases at the Robert T. Matsui Federal Courthouse‚ located at 501 I street in Sacramento‚ California. I attended the courthouse on April 6‚ 2017‚ from 1:45pm to 2:45pm in courtroom: No. 2 on the 15th floor. I attended two waivers of indictment‚ arraignment and change of plea cases. The cases involved the U.S. versus Hakob Sergoyan and the U.S. versus Stanislav Sarber. They both where tried for the same crime‚ and ended up presenting themselves to the Judge at the same time
Premium Crime Law Criminal law
In Judges 4‚ we meet two women who God decided to use to advance His kingdom. We first meet Deborah in verse 4. She is described as a prophetess and a wife‚ and she sat up on a hill where Israelites would come ask her for judgement. In the Old Testament‚ she also could be referred to as a judge. At the time‚ a judge was a political‚ military‚ and religious leader. The second woman we meet is Jael‚ a woman married to Heber the Kenite‚ an ally of Jabin the king of Hazor‚ or Canaan‚ the nation
Premium Bible Israelites Woman
Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee tells of a district magistrate of Chang-Ping in the T’ang Dynasty named Judge Dee Goong An‚ famous for his ability to solve mysterious cases. This is simple enough‚ except it is immediately evident to the reader that Judge Dee is not just a normal magistrate content with solving a case – it is easy to see that he always digs deeper. His success is unparalleled in the land‚ his actions laid out without a single corrupt thought or a lax view. What makes Judge Dee so effective
Premium Confucianism Chinese philosophy Han Dynasty
constitutional dictates and confined to the extent permitted by the Constitution which distinguishes it from being branded as an instance of “Judicial overreach” Do Judges make law? The traditional view on this matter is that‚ for the legislature‚ the question is always general interest against a particular interest. For the Judge‚ the only question is the true intention of the legislature. It is the province of the legislature to determine what
Premium Law Common law Supreme Court of the United States
Case Study - Hamilton County Judges Case (Chapter 4) Commom Pleas Court Q. 1Probibility of Cases Being Appealed and Q. 2 Probability of Q.3 Probability of Judge Reversed Appeal Rank Reversal Rank Fred Cartolano 0.04511 14 0.00395 Thomas Crush 0.03529 4 0.00297 Patrick Dinkelacker 0.03498 3 0.00636 Timothy Hogan 0.03071 2 0.00358 Robert Kraft 0.04047 10 0.00223 William Matthews 0.04019 7 0.00795 William Morrissey 0.03991 6 0.00726 Norbert Nadel 0.04427 13 0.00676 Arthur Ney Jr. 0.03883 5 0.00435
Premium Court Judge Conditional probability
Furthermore‚ the ratio decidendi is not just limited to the material facts as Goodhart had suggested. The judges may go beyond the facts; this is seen in Fisher v Bell and Partridge v Crittenden. The material facts of Fisher v Bell‚ which involved a flick knife with a price tag in a shop window‚ were deemed to be vastly different in comparison to Partridge. In Partridge v Crittenden‚ Bramblefinch Cocks were advertised in a newspaper‚ even though it was in direct breach of The Protection of Birds
Premium Law Jury Common law
In this essay‚ I will explain why Texas should retain the partisan election of judges. Texas is one of the few states that choose their judges using a Partisan voting method. Partisan elections can be unreliable and deceitful. A high legal position such as a judge should never be chosen in such a manner. Judges are not chosen based on merit or skills. Partisan elections do not represent the population accurately. The public is usually uninformed about the candidates they choose. In addition‚ partisan
Premium United States Elections Judge
roles of judges‚ magistrates‚ barristers‚ solicitors and juries. Judges & Magistrates- When hearing a case in court both magistrates and judges have to be unbiased and have no prejudices. They both have to make sure that no party is treated unfairly. Not only that but both parties must have a good sense of judgement and must be able to make sound decisions. Judges & Juries- Although Judges and jurors do not have many similarities there are a few. For example‚ both the judge and jury
Free Judge Jury Law