"Judges have specific philosophical rationales and sentencing guidelines when providing a judgment over presented facts if you were a judge what would be your sentencing goals and philosophical rationa" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 25 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6000 Philosophical Foundations in Education Beginning Questions !   !   !   !   !   2-3 sentence responses foundation of your philosophy paper reflects your current stance/belief 30 minutes keep a copy for your final personal philosophy paper Scriptural Focus Deut. 6:1-9 "Now this is the commandment‚ the statutes and the judgments which the LORD your God has commanded me to teach you‚ that you might do them in the land where you are going over to possess it‚ so that you and your

    Premium Psychology Philosophy Religion

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federal Judges are appointed:Answer | | | | | Selected Answer: | b. for life. | Response Feedback: | Correct‚ "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign‚ die‚ or are removed from office. | | | | | * Question 2 1 out of 1 points | | | Which of the following is a constitutional requirement for judges?Answer

    Premium Judge United States Law

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory sentencing: judges are too soft on criminals. Their entire focus should be on punishment and retribution‚ and if they keep wasting their time with other considerations then we should introduce mandatory sentencing. To what extent do you agree and why? The sentencing system should not be altered‚ for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right

    Premium Law Crime

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    INTRODUCTION The Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) of 2010 (Public Law 111-220) was an act by Congress‚ and became law on August 3‚ 2010 ( ). The FSA intent is to reduce the gap between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to initiate federal criminal penalties from a 100:1 weight ratio to an 18:1 weight ratio. The FSA also eliminates the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for the possession of crack cocaine (Reid 2012). The FSA replaced the controversial Anti-Drug Abuse

    Premium Drug addiction Drug Illegal drug trade

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Philosophical Argument for God’s Sake In this paper I will: (i) state the premises and conclusion of St. Thomas Aquinas’s “Uncaused Cause” argument‚ I will argue that the argument is a deductive argument. Merriam-Webster.com’s definition of cause is: “something or someone that produces an effect‚ result‚ or condition: something or someone that makes something happen or exist”. (www.merriam-webster.com) A deductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that the

    Premium Existence Ontology Metaphysics

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges have to make many discretionary decisions while they are on the bench. This is due to the fact that the law‚ no matter how well it is written‚ cannot anticipate every circumstance and eventuality that may be subject to that law. As a result‚ Judges are charged with making rational decisions in regards to the cases that don’t adequately fit the ramifications of the law. Most of the decisions that are made by Judges are independent of official guidelines and vary from Judge to Judge. This

    Premium Judge Rational choice theory Law

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court‚ Trials‚ and Sentencing: Due Process is a documentary explaining the court system within the criminal justice system. The American legal system is adversarial with two parties‚ the defense and the prosecution‚ working to prove to the jury their side is right. Overall the process of going through the court system is long and drawn out in order to make sure the person is guilty. From the initial charging to sentencing and appealing‚ there are a lot of steps the defendant needs to go through

    Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminal law

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamilton County Judges Case

    • 3033 Words
    • 13 Pages

    COUNTY JUDGES Hamilton County Judges try thousands of cases per year. In an overwhelming majority of the cases disposed‚ the verdict stands as rendered. However‚ some cases are appealed‚ and of those appealed‚ some of the cases are reversed. Kristen DelGuzzi of the Cincinnati Enquirer conducted a study of cases handled by Hamilton County Judges over a three-year period ( Cincinnati Enquirer‚ January 11‚ 1998 ). Shown in Table 2.5 are the results for 182‚908 cases handled (disposed) by 38 Judges in Common

    Premium Court Judge Law

    • 3033 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pancasila. It is the Indonesia’s philosophical foundation. The term of “Pancasila” etymologically is derived from two old Javanese words (originally from Sanskrit): panca meaning five‚ and sila meaning principles. It encompasses five principles considered to be inseparable and interrelated. First is belief in the one and only God. Second is just and civilised humanity. Third is the unity of Indonesia. Fourth is democracy guided by the inner wisdom in the unanimity arising out of deliberations amongst

    Premium Political party Ideology Marxism

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although we say it would be wrong to judge them‚ our society judges people of different social status’. Our society has grown to take one look at someone and judge them for what gender they‚ what their skin color is‚ and what religion they follow. These are some of the things that should not be judged by people because either they were born that way or they choose to follow that religion. Lastly‚ it is wrong to judge people for the way that they live or how they were born. If someone is a religion

    Premium Religion Morality Sociology

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 50