PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESSES INITIATING 4.1. DEVELOP PROJECT CHARTER 1. Project statement of work 2. Business case 3. Agreements 4. Enterprise environmental factors 5. Organizational process assets 1. Expert judgment 2. Facilitation techniques PLANNING EXECUTING 4.2. DEVELOP PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN MONITORING & CONTROLLING 4.3. DIRECT AND MANAGE PROJECT WORK 1. Project charter 2. Outputs from other processes 3. Enterprise environmental factors 4. Organizational process
Premium Project management Management
Court of Appeals of Ohio‚First District‚ Hamilton County. NADEL et al.‚ Appellants‚ v. BURGER KING CORPORATION et al.‚ Appellees. No. C-960489. Decided: May 21‚ 1997 Edward J. Felson and Stephen R. Felson‚ Cincinnati‚ for appellants. Jonathan P. Saxton‚ Cincinnati‚ for appellee Burger King Corporation. Droder & Miller Co.‚ L.P.A.‚ A. Dennis Miller and Kevin J. Ryan‚ Cincinnati‚ for appellee Emil‚ Inc. I. Facts On a morning in early December 1993‚ plaintiff-appellant Paul Nadel was driving
Premium
The standard by which decisions of a board of directors of a business are to be reviewed by the courts is known as the business judgment rule. The business judgment rule provides that a board members action is protected from challenge if there is a good business justification for the decision and it isn’t fraudulent or an abuse of discretion. When the business judgment rule is applied‚ the burden of proof to establish the impropriety of the decision is on those challenging it. In the case United
Premium Fiduciary Board of directors Stock
Control‚ in this context‚ should be seen more as a way to ensure safety rather than a way to limit freedom and oppress the public. Foucault refers to these techniques as means of corrective training; hierarchical observation‚ normalizing judgment‚ and examination. Whether we think of it or not‚ these techniques have been used for centuries by many institutions‚ organizations‚ and undoubtedly our very own government. First‚ hierarchical observation for Foucault is an exercise of discipline
Premium Sociology Criminal justice Prison
perception that Islamic law is destined to be eternally fixed in its provisions because its religious and doctrinaire character‚ close examination shows that its detailed provisions have constantly been subjected to interpretations. Shariah court judgments did not explicitly
Premium Sharia Civil procedure Law
The weakness of will is defined as a lack of self-control or the state of acting against one’s better judgment. Philosophers have debated for years about the philosophical puzzle surrounding the concept of the weakness of will. At the heart of the philosophical puzzle is the dichotomy between acknowledging the best course of action to take‚ yet deciding to complete an action rated below this initial plan. The lack of consistency between these two actions is the behavior that has puzzled philosophers
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
judicial review is both wider and more specific than was the case with “no evidence” grounds for judicial review at common law.‟ Justice Kirby‚ Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] 210 CLR 222‚ at [111]. Of the judgments in Rajamanikkam‚ which do you prefer‚ and what justification can you provide for your preference? In answering the question‚ you should read the following three prescribed cases. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam (2002)
Premium Law Common law
Memory is the mental faculty of retaining and recalling past experience. It ’s a very complex system and to understand it there have been many theories that attempt to explain it. In order to help me answer this question‚ I will look at the theorist JM Gardiner‚ along with other theorists such as Tulving‚ Mandler and Schacter in order to help me conclude if they are the same thing‚ inter-related or completely different. Tulving (1985)‚ distinguished between two quite different recollective experiences:
Premium Hippocampus Memory Amnesia
Cecilio Saldajeno‚ Leon Garibay‚ Timoteo Tubungbanua‚ and the Provincial Sheriff of Negros Occidental‚ (defendants) Margarita G. Saldajeno and her husband Cecilio Saldajeno‚ defendants-appellants. Nature: An appeal to the Court of Appeals from the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental in Civil Case no. 5343. Facts: * January 30‚ 1951 - the defendants entered into a Contract of Partnership under the firm name "Isabela Sawmill." * April 25‚ 1958 - an action to dissolve
Premium Plaintiff Appeal Negros Occidental
thinkers among the Enlightenment. He is motivated by the question what is beauty‚ and how certain responses to artwork reflect objectivity. Hume’s essay of 1757‚“Of the Standard of Taste” elegantly describes examples of the tradition of aesthetic judgment The growth of scientific knowledge influenced a sense of general optimism among Enlightenment thinkers. This sense of optimism in result called for a more critical use of human intellect. By overturning long established dogmas‚ people scrutinized
Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Age of Enlightenment