6 Judicial Activism in India Chief Justice P.N. Bhagwati Last fall the Law School was honored by a visit (rom Indian Chiefjustice Praiullachand Natwarlal Bhagwati. Justice Bhagwati came as the guest of Prof Marc Galanter‚ himself an expert on Indian law and a consultant to the Indian government in the Bhopal disaster. Bhagwati is the 17th chief justice of the Indian Supreme court‚ and follows his father as a justice of that court. India Today called Bhagwati‚ ’~conscious disciple of Felix Frankfurter
Free Law Judge Common law
BACKGROUND This paper aims at analyzing the industrial dispute between Qantas and the trade unions in 2011. The key questions include: _(1) WHAT WERE THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE QANTAS DISPUTE IN 2011? (2) WHAT DOES IT ILLUSTRATE ABOUT CHANGING INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS IN AUSTRALIA?_ To address the question (1)‚ there is an analysis of the interviews and documentary evidence to explain the causes and consequences of the Qantas dispute. To the question (2)‚ it applies theories of industrial relation
Premium Qantas Employment Trade union
Issues Meruya Land Dispute The dispute began in 1974 when Portanigra bought 44 hectares of land from Meruya Udik residents through a “coordinator” named Juhri bin Geni. In the same year‚ Juhri sold the land again to the city administration on the orders of the head of Kebon Jeruk district at that time. The city wanted to use the land to house people who had been evicted from locations used for the West Flood Canal. Juhri‚ along with two other brokers — Yahya bin Geni and Mohammad Yatim Tugono
Premium Jakarta
CHAPTER 14 NOTES Article II Article II‚ the Constitution’s Executive Article‚ begins this way: “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” With these few words‚ the Framers established the presidency. Why Presidential Power Has Grown * Over the course of American history‚ the champions of a stronger presidency have almost always prevailed. * The nation’s increasingly complex social and economic life has also influenced the growth of presidential
Free President of the United States United States Constitution United States
نشاته judicial precedent Kulliyyathu Dhirasaathil Islamiyya Shariah and law Degree Year two Thaareekhul Qaanoon Semester one J u d i c i a l Pr e c e d e n t Lecturer: Abdul Jaleel Hussain Ali Didi(2009202) 27 March 2011 Ali didi Sharia and law degree year two 1 تاريخ القانون و نشاته judicial precedent Contents 1- Introduction………………………………………………………………………………01 2- Introduction of judicial precedent………………………………………..………………02 3- History of judicial precedent…………………………………………………
Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis
Judicial creativity Judges are unable to develop the law as it would be considered unfair. If a defendant commits an act which is not considered criminal‚ but the judge then decides that it is‚ therefore changing the law‚ this would be considered unfair for the defendant. This would be seen as the retrospective effect. Parliament makes the law‚ following a lengthy process‚ and then the judges must follow parliament’s decision. They must follow precedent of higher court judges. This is known as
Premium Stare decisis Judge Ratio decidendi
Issues - D: You Decide | | | | Help | | | | ------------------------------------------------- Top of Form Bottom of Form | | Print This Page | | Scenario | | Scenario Summary | This group project covers a contract dispute situation. As a group‚ work through the following questions. Feel free to ask further questions in the thread of your group members‚ and answer your group members questions as well. The best work will be where all group members work together to get
Premium Marketing Management Negotiation
previous times. JUDICIAL REFORMS Judicial reforms are the complete or partial political reform of a country or a country’s judiciary. These reforms are often done as a part of wider reforms of the country’s political system. Judicial reform usually aims to improve such things as law courts‚ advocacy (bar)‚ executor process‚ inquest and record keeping. Valery Dmitrievich Zorkin (2004) in his article “Twelve Theses and legal reforms in Russia” said “there was collaboration between judicial reforms and
Free Law Separation of powers Constitution
THE DOCTRINE OF BINDING PRECEDENT INTRODUCTION The doctrine of binding precedent means the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. The doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare decisis i.e.‚ to stand by the decided. In practice‚ this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. This provides consistency and predictability in the
Premium Stare decisis Case law Precedent
Name: Paula Gordon Grant School: Clarksonville All Age Date: January 26-27‚ 2010 Grade: 8j & 9a Time Period: 1hr * 2 Topic: Conflict Resolution Rationale: Individuals‚ including children‚ are always facing conflict. Quite often these conflicts are not dealt with properly and so many cause hurt or even death. Children‚ more often than not‚ do not reason out conflict‚ instead they respond and become abusive or abused. In light of this‚ the counselor uses this opportunity to help equip students with
Premium Negotiation Mediation Dispute resolution