Running head: THE BASIC STRUCTURE THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION Liji George Christ University Abstract There are certain core parts of the Constitution which cannot be amended‚ at least not with the normal procedures of amendment. There was a time in the history of India when this particular issue was hotly debated‚ like the period from 1970s to 1980s. The framers of the constitution wanted the constitution to be a dynamic document rather than a rigid framework‚ which
Premium United States Constitution Indira Gandhi Law
There are three main types of judicial philosophy which is conservative‚ liberal‚ and moderate; this field is the metaphysical standpoints employed by judges to interpret laws. Theses recounts to the United States Supreme Court and the US courts and how the honesties and also the judges who work in those courts apply their belief systems. Judicial philosophy is extremely important because they decide which judges are agreed to unique court arrangements. Despite the fact that few judges observe to
Premium Law Judge Separation of powers
The French Legal System The French judicial system has developed through many stages during the nation’s history‚ and is deeply rooted in three major influences of the King‚ the people‚ and the outside. The first judicial system‚ a Private Reaction system‚ was established at the founding of France. A judicial system was then established after the Revolution of 1789. The judicial system after the Revolution was based on the principle of legal offenses and punishment. This was stimulated by
Premium Law Common law Judge
JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF PAKISTAN Judicial System of any country plays a vital role in her progress and in smooth running of state functionaries. All the developed countries of world have a well established and smooth running judicial system. Their courts are doing the justice irrespective of caste‚ living standards‚ official status of citizens and the individual powers. Even the most poor have the confidence in their courts and unbiased decision of courts are in fact a sword over the head of criminals
Free Law Judge
supremacy or legislative supremacy) is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty‚ and is supreme over all other government institutions‚ it also include executive or judicial bodies. The concept also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation‚ and so that it is not bound by written law (in some cases‚ even a constitution) or by precedent When Dicey wrote Law of the Constitution in 1885
Premium Separation of powers Law United Kingdom
A Constitution is a collection of rules that ensures a country is running efficiently. It guarantees that the government are governing correctly and that the rights of individual citizens are being protected. Constitutions can be found in different forms. They can be written or unwritten‚ rigid or flexible‚ federal or unitary in structure. Our UK constitution is unwritten however it possesses strong core constitutional principles‚ such as parliamentary supremacy‚ a responsible government‚ the rule
Free Law Separation of powers Constitution
Branch‚ and the Judicial Branch. It is widely argued that the framers of the Constitution used this specific order to show the branches in which they thought to be of most and least importance. This examination
Premium Separation of powers United States United States Constitution
The study of Law and the process of Judicial Rhetoric are two concepts that have been around since the days of Aristotle. While both have transitioned with time‚ the core of both of them have stayed the same. Where there is law‚ there has to be some sort of Judicial process. This procedure is how justice is administered and Truth is upheld in a society. You can not look at one of these ideas without the other. However‚ 15 pages is not nearly enough space to encompass such broad topics. Therefore
Premium Truth Hillary Rodham Clinton Question
In American Constitutional thought‚ it is generally regarded that the Judicial Branch and the courts should be independent from political sway. The Legislative and Executive branches were designed to represent the will of the people at the time‚ but the third branch is to remain isolated. Blatantly activist judges are generally regarded as unacceptable. It’s undeniable‚ however‚ that a completely independent judiciary is impossible in a democratic society. To some extent‚ the general populace plays
Premium Law Separation of powers Judge
BHINKAH S. v THE STATE 2009 SCJ 102 2009 MR 44 Record No. 7442 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of: S. Bhinkah Appellant V. The State Respondent JUDGMENT The Appellant pleaded guilty before the Intermediate Court to two counts of an information: namely‚ larceny whilst being more than two in number‚ in breach of Sections 301 (1) and 305 (1)(b) of the Criminal Code (Count 1) and larceny whilst being more than two in number and whilst being masked in breach of Sections 301(1)‚ 305(1)(b)
Premium