Efforts to fight drug use in America date back to colonial times. Every single drug that has made its way into our country has been the subject of government restriction. Therefore‚ every branch of our federal government has been involved in dealing with the drug problem in our society. The two ways of dealing with drug problems are regulation and prohibition. Regulation involves imposing taxes and restriction on a particular drug. Regulation is intended to increase the cost of the drug hoping to
Premium President of the United States Prohibition Drug addiction
Jerold I. Saddi SP LAWBUS 34 Case Summary Manuel G. Singsong‚ Jose Belzunce‚ Agustin E. Tonsay‚ Jose L. Espinos‚ Bacolod Southern Lumber Yard‚ and Oppenm Esteban Inc.‚ (Plaintiffs-Appellees) VS. Isabela Sawmill‚ Margarita G. Saldajeno and her husband Cecilio Saldajeno‚ Leon Garibay‚ Timoteo Tubungbanua‚ and the Provincial Sheriff of Negros Occidental‚ (defendants) Margarita G. Saldajeno and her husband Cecilio Saldajeno‚ defendants-appellants. Nature: An appeal to the Court of Appeals from
Premium Plaintiff Appeal Negros Occidental
Articles of Confederation vs Constitution The United States of America‚ a fascinating nation has definitely climbed a long path. For over 2 centuries‚ this nation flourished into the modern society that exists today. Although it wasn’t always like this‚ the people of this country had to overcome several obstacles and strenuous challenges. When the revolutionaries first gained Independence from Britain‚ they had no idea that their first form of government would
Premium Articles of Confederation United States Constitution United States
To start‚ we thought it would appropriate to remind everybody about the basics of arbitration‚ its purpose and general characteristics. At its core‚ arbitration is the private‚ judicial determination of a dispute‚ by an independent third party. An arbitration hearing may involve the use of an individual arbitrator or a tribunal. A tribunal may consist of any number of arbitrators though some legal systems insist on an odd number for obvious reasons of wishing to avoid a tie. One and three are the
Premium Arbitration
The goal of modern political and judicial institutions is to protect individual liberties against violations of the government. Representative government and rules of law‚ independence of courts and tribunals from interference from administrative offices‚ order to arrested detainees to determine the legality of arrest‚ judicial investigations and curtailment of arbitrariness of administration‚ freedom of speech and press‚ separation of state from church and many other institutions‚ only one goal
Premium Political philosophy Law Democracy
Linux vs. Mac vs. Windows Linux vs. Mac vs. Windows The operating systems Linux®‚ Macintosh® (Mac) and Microsoft® Windows® are the main software to every computer system to run properly along with other hardware. These operating systems (OS ’s) are very different in several ways‚ but they also have some similarities too. Linux‚ Mac and Windows use memory management‚ process management‚ file management and security management to operate the computer systems correctly
Premium Operating system File system Microsoft Windows
governance‚ not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice‚ democracy‚ or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example‚ legislative enactments‚ judicial decisions‚ or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just‚ wise‚ efficient‚ or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law‚ and the fact that it is unjust‚ unwise‚ inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient
Free Law
A.C. No. 5955 September 8‚ 2009 JOHN CHRISTEN S. HEGNA‚ Complainant‚ vs. ATTY. GOERING G.C. PADERANGA‚ Respondent. PETITIONER’S (COMPLAINANT) CLAIM: RESPONDENT’S CLAIM: ISSUE/S: is Atty. Paderanga guilty of engaging in dishonest and deceitful conduct? RULING: A.C. No. 5955 September 8‚ 2009 JOHN CHRISTEN S. HEGNA‚ Complainant‚ vs. ATTY. GOERING G.C. PADERANGA‚ Respondent. D E C I S I O N DEL CASTILLO‚ J.: Before this Court is a letter-complaint1 dated
Premium Defendant Prima facie Plaintiff
obtained by police in state cases since Brown v. Mississippi‚ 297 U. S. 278 (1936). (Davis v. North Carolina‚ 384 U.S. 737 (1966)) The Warren Court from 1953 until 1969 established luminary rights with its liberal interpretation‚ and as some say “ judicial policy making”‚ such as the “right to privacy” Griswold v. Connecticut‚ 381 U.S. 479(1965)‚ “separate but equal is not constitutional” Brown v. Board of Education‚ 347 U.S. 483 (1954) and the definitive protection of rights in the Miranda decision
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Share Supreme Court of India PETITIONER:INDIRA NEHRU GANDHI (SMT.) Vs. RESPONDENT:RAJ NARAIN & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT24/06/1975 BENCH:KRISHNAIYER‚ V.R. CITATION: 1975 AIR 1590 1975 SCC (2) 159 ACT: Representation of the People Act‚ 1951‚ S.116B(2)-Stay of election judgment and order-Judge-Power-Dimensions of Judge power to stay-Difference between executive discretion and judicial discretion‚ explained-Cognisability of non-legal arguments in such cases-Equity and ground of
Premium Court Appeal Judge