Phuc Nguyen Professor Elizabeth Curry Final Draft Compare Juror #8 and Juror #3 One of the top one hundred movies of all time according to the American Film Institute (number 87 to be exact)‚ “12 Angry Men”‚ a play written by Reginald Rose‚ is considered a household classic today and the definition of a quality movie. Unlike many of the movies today‚ 12 Angry Men doesn’t use vulgar language‚ have raunchy sex scenes‚ or any type of real violence throughout the movie‚ but yet it is still considered
Premium Jury
Comparison essay comparing Juror 3 and Juror 8 What are some similarities between Jurors 3 and 8? What about differences? Oh gosh‚ it’s been years since I’ve seen the movie (didn’t read the play). Okay‚ Juror #3 is the angry father‚ and Juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the INNOCENT vote‚ right? I suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts. There is one similarity in that when they really believe something‚ they
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
among a jury room. The votes and opinions vary with juror 8 and juror 3 as all of the jurors discuss the trial of the Hispanic boy accused of 1st degree murder of his own father. Votes‚ reasons‚ attitude‚ and biased feelings make up this particular jury. The protagonist in the jury room‚ juror 8‚ and the antagonist in the jury room‚ juror 3‚ both back up their opinion as to whether or not the Hispanic boy is guilty or innocent. The jurors reasoning behind their opinions are based on facts and
Premium Jury Not proven Law
12 angry men was especially juror number 8 and the old man juror 9‚ also juror number 6. The reason i liked juror number 8 is because‚ juror 8 didn’t agree guilty right away just like the other jurors‚ number 8 really wanted to explain why everyone voted guilty. He didn’t right away think that the kid was really a murderer‚because of the father as the court had said that the father was abusive and that the kid was everywhere as an orphan but so long to be beaten‚ number 8 thought after so long of taking
Premium Jury Not proven Trial
Angry Men This essay will show the comparison and contrasts of Juror 3 and Juror 8. The first comparison of the jurors is‚ Juror 3 is very opinionative‚ and Juror 8 is factual. Another comparison is juror 3 has a lot of anger which makes him aggressive‚ and juror 8 is calm so he is passive. The final comparison that will be discussed is that juror 3 is a bully and yells on top of his lungs to get his way‚ and juror 8 is a natural leader who persuades the jury with his facts. This movie was based on
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
of Law’ in 1957‚ and explores how the persistence and determination of juror 8 eventually influences the other jurors into changing their minds about the verdict. Juror 8‚ the protagonist of the play‚ continually questions the veracity of the evidence in order to persuade other jurors to think about reasonable doubt. He goes out of his way to attempt to make other jurors deliberate about the murder. Even though the 8th juror broke the law by submitting the ‘one of a kind’ switchblade knife in the
Premium Jury Not proven 12 Angry Men
Juror 10 There are two main characteristics of the 10th juror that influence his verdict. The first is that juror 10 is prejudiced against the defendant (most likely he is racist‚ but we can not be 100% sure). The second is that he is uncaring and impatient. The first time we get a glimpse of juror 10’s prejudice is on page 7 when he says “It’s the element. I’m telling you they let those kids run wild up there. Well‚ maybe it serves them right.” He believes
Premium Jury Verdict Not proven
justice system‚ one of them being a shared prejudice amongst the jurors against the defendant. For example‚ Juror 3 an extremely opinioned bigot was selected even through so called “thorough” cross-examination. In contrast‚ there is Juror 8 a more quiet and thoughtful gentleman who seems to not have any prejudice. Juror 8 is a very respectable person who genuinely cares about letting the defendant have a fair trial. For instance‚ Juror 8 said‚ “There were eleven votes for guilty-it’s not so easy for
Premium Jury 12 Angry Men Henry Fonda
dispositions he hold towards them. Juror 3’s blind hatred towards the teen turned out to be his unresolved emotional conflict with his own son. Another juror 10 depended solely on the logic of the situation and how it makes sense for the boy to be guilty. The emotional expressions of the actors are shot in close-up‚ focusing on each actor’s faces giving equal importance to all characters‚ which helps viewers to relate to the back stories each character‚ holds. Juror 8 appeals to the rational‚ sensible
Premium Jury Law
The Last Juror by John Grisham 1. "From day one she was intimidated by me because I was from Memphis and had gone to school up North for five years. I was careful not to wear my Ivy Leagueness on my shoulder‚ but at the same time I wanted these rural Mississippians to know that I had been superbly educated. (page 10)" There are two literary elements that could be categorized in this excerpt. I think that John Grisham highlights his use of satire very vividly early on in the book. He is placing
Premium Mississippi Confederate States of America Southern United States