Who Had To Use Thinking Skills In Twelve Angry Men‚ a young man is on trial for stabbing and killing his father. The movie focuses on twelve randomly selected citizens who are assigned the duty of determining the fate of this 19 year old man. The jury is supposed to examine certain facts and determine the truth based solely on the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors will judge fairly and without personal bias. Basically‚ the jurors need to use critical thinking during
Premium Critical thinking Thought
days of trial‚ now the jury needs to decide whether this eighteen-year-old boy is the murderer of his father. It is a hot afternoon‚ and 12 men are locked in the jury room to discuss the case. In the first vote‚ 11 men think the boy is guilty; only one doesn’t vote guilty simply because he thinks it is too soon to make this decision. The other men get angry about his words and try to show the evidence to persuade him: the noise heard by the old man living under stairs‚ the crime motive‚ the murdering
Premium Jury
audience and include different opinions into a shared conclusion. In the movie “12 Angry Men”‚ juror number 8 (Henry Fonda) was not sure if evidence presented against a young defendant in court left reasonable doubt for a guilty conviction. The other jurors believed the presented facts and the defendant’s background warrants a guilty conviction. The movie showed how juror number 8 persuasively got the other jurors to review each fact logically‚ which led to an unanimous not guilty decision. Conger
Premium Regulatory Focus Theory Persuasion Logic
Moral Foundations 12 Angry Men and Morality A moral person does what is right for the group or society as a whole‚ not what is just right for themselves or one other person at any given point in time. In 12 Angry Men the voice of moral reason is clearly Juror Number 8‚ who from the beginning is the only “Not Guilty” vote because he believes they should at least talk about the court case of the Puerto Rican boy before they send him ultimately to his death. Juror 8 had integrity; he realized
Premium Jury Evidence Law
A persons surroundings can influence him. In "12 Angry Men" by Reginald Rose a young mans life is held by twelve men with contrasting views. After hearing‚ the case the jurors go into deliberations. Eleven of the 12 are convinced that the boy murdered his father. However‚ Juror # 8 a caring man‚ who wishes to talk about why the other jurors think that the boy is guilty‚ clashes with Juror # 3‚ a sadistic man who would pull the switch himself to end the boys life. Early on‚ it’s not revealed why #3
Free Jury Not proven
Introduction 12 Angry Men is a good example of group and individual behavior. It clearly illustrates the pressure of conformity and groupthink. A group can be defined as two or more individuals‚ interacting and interdependent‚ who come together to achieve a particular objective. In the movie 12 Jurors come together with the sole obligation of concluding if the young man was guilty of murdering his father or not‚ beyond reasonable doubt. This group of 12 men who did not know each other walked
Premium Jury Not proven Critical thinking
12 Angry Men Questions Shakil Mirza April‚ 20th 2012 1. Do you think that the jury in this movie came to the right decision? Why/why not? I think that the jury in this movie came to the wrong decision‚ because I feel that all throughout the deliberation the factual evidence did not have any reasonable doubt lingering above it‚ which was the complete opposite of the opinion of juror 8‚ and gradually everyone else. While there was factual evidence presented‚ juror 8 persuaded all the
Premium Jury
Final Draft Compare Juror #8 and Juror #3 One of the top one hundred movies of all time according to the American Film Institute (number 87 to be exact)‚ “12 Angry Men”‚ a play written by Reginald Rose‚ is considered a household classic today and the definition of a quality movie. Unlike many of the movies today‚ 12 Angry Men doesn’t use vulgar language‚ have raunchy sex scenes‚ or any type of real violence throughout the movie‚ but yet it is still considered a classic. “12 Angry Men” is the captivating
Premium Jury
12 Angry Men Influence Analysis In the movie 12 Angry Men‚ you will find the power of influence and the effect it can have over a majority audience. Juror #8 who plays the protagonist role‚ is the only juror that votes not guilty in the initial round of deliberations. Fonda who plays juror #8 is faced with many challenges in trying to convince a room of jurors who feel strongly that the boy is guilty. The setting itself was not the best one‚ the room was hot‚ there was no air conditioning
Premium Jury Verdict Persuasion
Tajhe Lamarre 12 Angry men The movie “12 Angry Men” displays many well orchestrated examples of the terms Pathos‚ Ethos‚ and Logos. Through this film many topics arise in order to reach a verdict on a young mans life. The boy was on trial for murder‚ and most of the evidence at first glance made him look guilty. Twelve jurors must reach a unanimous decision in order to convict this young man‚ but the task seems to be more difficult to accomplish as one of the men fights in the boys favor.
Premium Jury Man Logic