Week 2 Knowledge Check Study Guide Concepts Mastery CRITICAL THINKING BARRIERS Score: 9 / 9 Questions 100% 1 2 100% 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 OVERCOMING CRITICAL THINKING BARRIERS Concept: CRITICAL THINKING BARRIERS Mastery 100% Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. What is one of the reasons that enculturation is considered as a barrier to critical thinking? A. Because people vary in degree to which they use their attributes. B. Because our psychological world is shaped by our exposure to
Premium Logic Critical thinking Reasoning
2013 12 Angry Men In the film Twelve Angry Men‚ all jury members discussed the evidence of a boy’s murder trial. It seems as though it should be an easy‚ unanimous vote for guilty however after hours of analyzing and discussing the evidence it comes down to the most powerful evidence; the eye witnesses. How reliable really were the eye witnesses to the boy’s murder? The most convincing testimonies do not always add up as proven by this jury. Factors such as‚ less than ideal observation‚ shortness
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
or characters‚ are the Judge‚ the jury‚ the plaintiff’s attorney‚ the defendant’s attorney‚ the plaintiff‚ the defendant‚ court stenographer and witnesses. This paper will discuss communication techniques largely used by the attorneys. After all‚ who are best actors? When does communication start? The communication process begins when potential jurors are summoned by written communication through the United States Postal System to attend court for jury selection. Each juror is directed
Premium Jury Communication Nonverbal communication
to reach (e.g. majority‚ consensus‚ authoritarian‚ etc.) * When the 12 person jury meets in the room to vote on a guilty or non-guilty verdict‚ the method used to vote was 1st based on a majority decision-making process where those would raise their hands for guilty and a non-guilty verdict. Once the results were in and 11 voted guilty and 1 voting not guilty. Based on the movie‚ 11 members of the jury voted guilty while 1 juror voted non-guilty. The 1 non-guilty‚ disrupted the dynamics of
Premium Decision making Decision theory Decision making software
his father’s death. An initial vote was cast‚ where eleven men voted guilty and one juror voted not guilty. Ultimately‚ the jury decided that he was not guilty after deliberations. The twelve-person jury must decide if the boy is guilty or is there reasonable doubt to believe that he is not guilty. The jury must vote on guilty or not guilty. If there are disagreements‚ the jury must debate until they reach to a consensus. Juror ten was a cold and racist man‚ who was vehemently against those who
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
you’re taking on a powerful and organized establishment you have to be a hierarchy” (237). The group must create a thorough plan with objectives for each individual participating in order for all aspects to be controlled. In the essay‚ “Committees‚ Juries‚ and Teams”‚ James Surowiecki claims‚ “One of the real dangers that small groups face is emphasizing consensus over dissent” (476). Often groups feel the need to agree on their points of view. In each strong group‚ a “devil’s advocate” is an important
Free Jury Thought Malcolm Gladwell
Law[5] is a system of rules usually enforced through a set of institutions. The purpose of law is to provide an objective set of rules for governing conduct and maintaining order in a society. The oldest known codified law is the Code of Ur-Nammu‚ written in the Sumerian language circa 2100 BC-2050 BC. The preface directly credits the laws to king Ur-Nammu of Ur. In different parts of the world‚ law could be established by philosophers or religion. In the modern world‚ laws are typically created
Free Police Law Jury
if Lady Justice is truly blind. No matter what is said‚ trial by jury has its flaws. The article “Justice is Not Blind” says‚ “It is not only the accused who can be wrongfully treated by the justice system; victims also suffer the consequence of injustice when wealthy offenders with powerful connections simply get a slap on the wrist instead of being held responsible to face the consequences of their crimes” (Nikkel). Flaws in the jury system affect everyone. The judicial system needs to reformed‚
Premium O. J. Simpson murder case O. J. Simpson Jury
In the early 1980’s in a small Podunk town of Ada‚ Oklahoma‚ a young woman named Debra Sue Carter‚ was savagely raped and killed in her own apartment after work at the local cocktail bar. Quickly‚ the town drunk was arrested in relation to the rape and murder with nothing more than a single “eyewitness” that placed him at the woman’s job that night. Many regulars to the bar said that “they would know if Ron Williamson was at the Coach Light and he wasn’t there.” They‚ in fact‚ named another man:
Premium Abuse Victim Prison
criminal courts within the English legal system. The most influential lay people are the Lay Magistrates and the Jury who have important roles with the legal system. Magistrates usually deal with most cases that are heard within the criminal system. They are the decision makers as to guilt or innocence making 97-99% of all cases while on the other hand 1% of cases are heard with a jury present. This shows us that those that are not legally qualified make most decisions regarding the criminal justice
Premium Jury Judge Crime