My class and I did a mock trial mirroring the one from Native Son‚ written by Richard Wright. The class was divided between the prosecution‚ jury‚ defense and the judge. We did this case to interpret the book’s case in our own reality. During the mock trial‚ both sides introduced their claims. The prosecuting side argued that Bigger should be sentenced to death and the defense side argued that Bigger acted upon insanity and should be put in rehabilitation. Each side brought up a witness and each
Premium Lawyer Question Prosecutor
Clinical Trials ‘All patients should receive the best possible therapy AND the well-being of the individual research subject must take precedence over all other interests.’ Says article 11.3 of the ‘Declaration of Helsinki’‚ the Holy Grail for biomedical research on humans. With more and more clinical trials being conducted in developing countries‚ the question naturally arises…while outsourcing these trials‚ are the pharmaceutical companies growing to disregard this declaration? To be able
Premium Informed consent Pharmacology Clinical trial
Court‚ Trials‚ and Sentencing: Due Process is a documentary explaining the court system within the criminal justice system. The American legal system is adversarial with two parties‚ the defense and the prosecution‚ working to prove to the jury their side is right. Overall the process of going through the court system is long and drawn out in order to make sure the person is guilty. From the initial charging to sentencing and appealing‚ there are a lot of steps the defendant needs to go through
Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminal law
On the behalf of the client Gene Forrester‚ we the prosecution find him Guilty of committing voluntary manslaughter upon Phineas. He is found guilty of voluntary manslaughter on the following counts : He has the means‚ motive based on a mental illness‚ the opportunity‚ the witnesses that will testify against him‚ as well as a full out written confession. First‚ he had the means. While Gene is not an athlete he‚ at 140 lbs. is still quite capable of climbing a tree branch and there for jostling
Premium Law Jury United States
The Star Chamber The movie‚ The Star Chamber‚ takes a poignant look at our judicial system and forces us to consider what is legally and morally right. The movie stars Michael Douglas as a judge who is discouraged after he sees that one of his cases is dismissed on a technicality. The defendants‚ two men charged with kidnapping and murder‚ are released because the police officers who arrested them did not follow the law when it came to collecting the evidence. Michael Douglas’s character becomes
Premium Jury Law Court
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury‚ I stand before you as a person‚ defending a person. A person that I believe to be innocent. Tom Robinson would pass Mayella Ewells house on his way to the fields everyday‚ to help her out with things around the house. This dose not make him guilty. Tom is a good man. He would never hurt a fly. In fact his owner made a statement that "hes never caused a speck of trouble." My first point of evidence has to do with DNA and blood. Tom Robinson has type AB blood‚ which
Premium Jury Black people Race
“everybody deserves a fair trial.” Does the defendant in this case get a fair trial? Twelve Angry Men‚ a play by Reginald Rose‚ was written in 1955 at a time when America was involved in a cold war with communist countries. It shows the strength of a deliberative process that enables individuals‚ who have “nothing to gain or lose‚” to reach a verdict. In the American jury system “everybody deserves a fair trial” and in Twelve Angry Men the defendant gets a very fair trial. All the jurors have their
Free Jury
DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Defendants‚ Monclaire Saint Louis and Ulriste Tulin‚ through undersigned counsels‚ pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure‚ and hereby respectfully moves the Court for a continuance of the trial in this matter. As grounds for this Motion‚ counsel submits the following Memorandum in Support: MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT 1. The defendants‚ Haitian Nationals‚ are charged with Conspiracy to Commit Hostage Taking‚ 18 U.S.C. § 1203‚ two counts of Aiding
Premium United States Federal Bureau of Investigation Criminal law
Beowulf/Grendel Trial or Debate Activity Debate: Two teams will debate the merits of Grendel’s viewpoint. The rest of the class will act as judges and rate the winning team. (ALL students will contribute to the debate by helping to suggest/refine talking points - each group will vote for members to participate in debate). Resolved: Since the world and everything in it is an unplanned accident‚ existence is meaningless ;the past is irrelevant; nothing matters. For: This team will take the
Free Critical thinking Logic Judge
barristers‚ solicitors and juries. Judges & Magistrates- When hearing a case in court both magistrates and judges have to be unbiased and have no prejudices. They both have to make sure that no party is treated unfairly. Not only that but both parties must have a good sense of judgement and must be able to make sound decisions. Judges & Juries- Although Judges and jurors do not have many similarities there are a few. For example‚ both the judge and jury in any case have to be unbiased
Free Judge Jury Law