ABOUT PASSIVE RESISTANCE There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Everyone has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely‚ everyone has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. It is morally justifiable to peacefully resist unjust laws; unjust laws do not change because a court or government decides; they change because people stand united together to make change happen. The governments of today make laws that self serve their own interests and that of
Premium Political philosophy Law Civil disobedience
throughout our history because of crude laws that have been passed. These laws are not based on logic‚ but on the creator’s own skewed biases against certain populations.
Premium Discrimination Oppression Racial segregation
significantly different from other people‚ thus there reasoning on what is just and unjust can also be different. As a result‚ if a leader cannot distinguish the wrong in an unjust act‚ society would not be able to protect people from evil individuals‚ resulting in a dangerous society to live in. Moving on‚ Aristotle thought humans fall into one of three
Premium Morality Ethics Nazi Germany
A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm‚ as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1‚ evaluates the conditions that constitute just war‚ and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths‚ this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”‚ and provides only a foundation
Premium Argentina Royal Navy
democracy we have a moral duty in general to obey the laws or to attempt altering laws we don’t like through the electoral process. In America civil disobedience cannot be justified since it goes against the ideals of democracy. Living in a country where there are legal solutions to a problem that can take months or years to solve‚ people must voice their concerns and rebel against the government through grassroots movements and protests. Breaking laws that were created to protect the government and its
Premium Law Human rights Civil disobedience
is every changing‚ are the rules of war‚ as described by Michael Walzer in his book‚ Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally‚ in a time where so much has changed‚ there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past‚ the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust
Premium Laws of war World War II
War is Hell A review of chapter 2‚ ’The Crime of War’ in Michael Walzer’s book‚ "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997. In this chapter‚ Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice‚ first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting‚ secondly with
Premium War World War II English-language films
Carl Albert State College The Death Penalty Just or Unjust Phil 3203 April 14‚ 2014 The Death Penalty Just or Unjust? The Death Penalty Just or Unjust The death penalty is the punishment of execution‚ administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. Capital crimes may include first degree murder (premeditated)‚ murder with special circumstances (such as intentional‚ multiple‚ involved with another crime‚ with guns‚ of a police officer‚ or a repeat offense)
Premium Murder Capital punishment Prison
The Death Penalty Is the death penalty just or unjust? It has been argued that capitol punishment is imposed merely to gratify a desire for revenge. Whether or not a punishment is legal depends upon whether or not it serves a valid goal or purpose of a policy. The death penalty is usually defended on two grounds; is useful and that is just . Is capitol punishment moral or immoral? Is the death penalty moral? Capitol punishment is imposed to spare future victims of murder by carrying out the
Premium Capital punishment Crime Prison
questions the action of murder leaving the reader to question whether the murder was just or unjust. Hamlet is also kept popular by questioning the morality behind suicide. Many characters are murdered in the story. Murder is considered immoral in our society‚ but many would say that a majority of the killings were just in their own way. Hamlet slaying King Claudius would be the main one. Some would say Hamlet was just to kill Claudius due to Claudius killing Hamlet’s father‚ King Hamlet. The next most
Premium Hamlet Characters in Hamlet Gertrude