debated for centuries and still cannot reach an ending. The issue has been discussed in various focuses including ‘economics’. How is ‘liberty vs. equality’ concept talked about in economics? For instance‚ if you believe that ‘progressive tax’ is a good idea and the right thing to do‚ then you are probably an egalitarian person; if you do not‚ then of course you are one of the ‘libertarians’. Another example is ‘inheritance tax’‚ which refers to a tax paid by a person who inherits money from another
Premium Socialism Capitalism Communism
Both Justice Scalia and Justice Breyer agree more than they differ and they agree about nothing so much as the extent to which they agree. Justice Scalia is a conservative and a calls himself an “originalist‚” believing that judges should determine the framers’ original intent in the words of the constitution‚ and stick by what is says. Justice Breyer‚ on the other hand‚ is more of liberal‚ often called a pragmatist. Breyer believes in what he calls the living Constitution‚ the idea that the values
Premium United States Constitution United States Law
Justice in Various Forms Justice is defined and thought of in many different ways by different cultures in relation to their values. As discussed by Dr. Gorman‚ the Roman and American cultures share a similar view of justice‚ in which when someone is wronged; they hold the belief that one should get revenge. This idea is a sort of eye for an eye mentality to which Ghandi wisely stated‚ “an eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind”. This quote in its own way somewhat embodies the
Free Christianity Christian terms Virtue
Socrates and Aristotle both have contrasting views of the concept of justice which serves to influence their notions of an ideal constitution. The abstract‚ speculative ideas of Socrates will be compared and contrasted with the practical‚ sensory ones of Aristotle in matters concerning justice and politics. Both Aristotle and Socrates disagree with regards to the definition of justice and what qualities are attributed to a just person. According to Aristotle‚ a just person must follow the law
Premium Justice Virtue Plato
Tragedy of Hamlet by William Shakespeare‚ the characters are motivated to seek revenge in order to get what they believe is justice. Shakespeare’s main character‚ Prince Hamlet‚ is both clouded by his passion for vengeance and his responsibility to revive a sense of justice to Denmark‚ which evidently creates the ultimate tragedy of the play. Undoubtedly‚ the theme of revenge and justice is present throughout the entire play‚ from the moment young Hamlet is confronted by the ghost of his father to the very
Premium Hamlet Ghost Prince Hamlet
Blair Intro to Criminal Justice Larry Cunningham 1 October 2012 Restorative Justice Restorative justice by definition in the book is “a sentencing model that builds on restitution and community participation in an attempt to make the victim feel “whole again” (Criminal Justice Today p702)”. A more simple way of defining restorative justice is that it’s a way to try to repair the damage done to all parties after a crime is committed or witnessed. Restorative justice was created because everyone
Premium Crime Criminology Restorative justice
Justice is defined as putting something at its place ‚ fairness indistribution of resources . A good law must be universal ‚ must be public and must be final besides being decided between competing interest . But ‚ still there is no relation or equation between law and justice . The term law and justice always be used to reflect the law purpose . Although it reflect the law purpose ‚ but not all people view law as just . For example in homosexual group view ‚ they view law as unjust as homosexual
Premium Law Justice
Restorative justice is an approach to justice that focuses on the needs of the victims and the offenders‚ as well as the involved community‚ instead of satisfying abstract legal principles or punishing the offender. Restorative Justice approaches to crime date back thousands of years. The word restorative justice has appeared in written sources since the first half of the nineteenth century. In Restoring Justice –An Introduction to Restorative Justice‚ Daniel W. Van Ness and Karen Heetderks Strong
Premium Restorative justice Criminology Criminal justice
Law and Justice Abstract Justice is the quality of being fair or just. This is not an exhaustive definition of justice. Different philosophers have defined justice in different ways. Justice is a concept that provides balance between law and morality. Rawls proposition for law and justice has been accepted by world judicial fraternity as a landmark vision to understand the system. Similarly it has earned a good amount of criticism which shows the basic strength of the thought. As such: Rawls theories
Premium John Rawls A Theory of Justice Justice
Distributive Justice (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Page 1 of 26 Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free Distributive Justice First published Sun Sep 22‚ 1996; substantive revision Mon Mar 5‚ 2007 Principles of distributive justice are normative principles designed to guide the allocation of the benefits and burdens of economic activity. After outlining the scope of this entry and the role
Premium Political philosophy Law Justice