"Kant rationalism and empiricism" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 31 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant‚ Thucydides‚ and Weber collectively agreed on one premise – human nature directly affect the political actions of a state‚ whether they be moral or immoral. Given the different time periods each of these political theorists studied in‚ each man had vastly different ideas on the consequences of human nature on political actions‚ or vice versa. Thucydides was a consequentialist‚ Kant was a staunch deontologist‚ and Weber believed that both consequentialism and deontology had their own place within

    Premium Political philosophy Religion Plato

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A CRITICAL STUDY OF VIRTUE ETHICS IN ARISTOTLE AND KANT Aristotle was the first western thinker to divide philosophy into branches which are still recognizable today: logic‚ metaphysics‚ and natural philosophy‚ philosophy of mind‚ ethics and politics‚ rhetoric; he made major contributions in all these fields. He was born in Stagira‚ a city of northern Greece in 384 BC. His father Nicomachus was a doctor at the court of Amyntas of Macedon‚ who preceded Philip‚ the conqueror of much of Greece. Aristotle

    Premium Ethics Nicomachean Ethics Virtue

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Sikkema Professor John Schneider Ethics 102 25 February 2015 Deontological Moral Theory: Immanuel Kant Deontological moral theory is defined as the morally right thing to do is to do whatever is your duty. A scenario in which this theory could be used is the following: a close friend of yours dies. He has set aside $10 million to give to his favorite sports team‚ the New York Yankees. You promised him that you would give the money to the team because that was your friend’s last wish. Generous

    Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Morality

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral Behavior: Aquinas and Aristotle vs. Kant When comparing between the philosophies of St. Thomas Aquinas/Aristotle and those of Immanuel Kant when regarding moral behavior‚ there are some very fundamental differences. On one hand‚ you have Kant’s autonomous perspective on behavior morality‚ in which you give the law to yourself. On the other hand‚ you have the heteronomy views of Aristotle and Aquinas which concludes that one can measure their conduct against an external force. Kant’s

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle‚ Immanuel Kant‚ and John Stuart Mill all discuss their philosophical systems‚ each striving to uncover the standard that guides morality. In Nicomachean Ethics‚ Aristotle outlines his system‚ beginning with the Chief Good towards which everything aims. The Chief Good is happiness‚ and is achieved through a life well lived. A life well lived results from performing our characteristic activity well‚ and humans’ characteristic activity is reason. Thus Aristotle uses reason to differentiate

    Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My paper will present Jeremy Bentham’s views and ideas on "Principles of moral legislation". Then I well assemble Immanuel Kant’s criticism in "The goodwill and autonomy". I conclude by arguing that Immanuel Kant has the best suitable notion of success for us the students in order to succeed in the community. You can succeed by living in forms of your values or by achieving something that you are passionate about. Like finishing college or enjoying your work./job. I think and believe that

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Morality

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the taking of one’s life by one’s own hand without assistance. Mercy Killing is also a term used and it refers to someone taking a direct action to terminate a person’s life without the person’s permission. Within this paper I will discuss Immanuel Kant and the utilitarianism ethical theories revolving around the issues of euthanasia. Euthanasia or “mercy killing/death” as it may be referred to as has become more complex as the centuries go on; there are three specific forms of Euthanasia. There

    Premium

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between Kant and Aristotle here can be traced to a difference over the nature of the will. For Kant‚ the will seems to be something that can be insulated completely from natural influences and inclinations. It is the only thing for which a person can be said to be completely responsible. And this isolated point of pure responsibility is the only proper subject of moral evaluation and hence esteem. Aristotle‚ on the other hand‚ has no notion of a point (or realm) of pure responsibility

    Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    scared to think freely for themselves and to question the authority who guides them‚ and often what they are told by people in authority or people in the public eye turns out to be lies‚ humbug‚ or even bullshit. This argument is made by both Immanual Kant and Harry G. Frankfurt‚ who both claim that members of society don’t look into what is said often enough‚ and don’t raise questions. This is seen most commonly in the way American’s blindly follow the words of politicians. It is commonplace for people

    Premium Lie Politician

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homework 7 Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that focused on religion and science. He often had ideas that religion was explained by science. He believed for someone to have room in their mind for faith‚ they needed to have less room in their mind for other things. If someone is uneducated and is interested in fires or hurting people‚ then they will have no room in their mind for faith and that is why they do not believe. A very important theory he discussed was the idea of how we learn. He believed

    Premium Religion Science Scientific method

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 50