For Immanuel Kant‚ guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that‚ an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view‚ utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands
Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminology
6 SOCIOLOGICAL INQUIRY Kant also distinguishes three kinds of free- dom: freedom of choice‚ or free will; freedom as self-regulation‚ or autonomy; and freedom as civil liberty. Freedom of choice is a natural property of all human beings‚ and refers to the fact that human conduct is not wholly determined by animal impulses. Autonomy is the capacity of a subject to legislate and abide by ethical impera- tives of his own making. Civil liberty
Free Sociology
The difference between Kant and Aristotle here can be traced to a difference over the nature of the will. For Kant‚ the will seems to be something that can be insulated completely from natural influences and inclinations. It is the only thing for which a person can be said to be completely responsible. And this isolated point of pure responsibility is the only proper subject of moral evaluation and hence esteem. Aristotle‚ on the other hand‚ has no notion of a point (or realm) of pure responsibility
Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Ethics
relation between various facts. It becomes a law‚ when the facts have rigourous test and acceptability as a true theory. Over the years however‚ social science research‚ especially in Africa have suffered some constraining factors‚ which are epistemological‚ methological‚ as well as socio-cultural in nature.
Premium Scientific method Science
is no reason that they should not be treated as people and be acknowledged as having human rights. In a situation where two people’s benefits are conflicting‚ this right must be deliberated and equivalent. I will argue that the moral principles of Kant‚ Marquis‚ and Thomson on abortion will oppose Sue and her husband’s decision to have a late-term abortion at seven months pregnant. Reason 1: As discussed in the Marquis document‚ “The loss of one’s life
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
You be the Judge #3 Deborah Andriaccio D’Youville College Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of LAW 303V Judge Thomas Rebhan June 6‚ 2014 Kashin V. Kent 457 F.3d 1033‚ 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20496 United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit‚ 2006 Scope of employment refers to a person actively involved in an employment task at a particular time. It usually becomes an issue when an accident occurs‚ which is required to make
Premium Employment Supreme Court of the United States United States
Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who‚ like several philosophers at the time‚ contemplated and wrote about morality‚ specifically the origin of human morals. Kant‚ unlike these other thinkers‚ believed that morality and religion‚ two topics that were typically paired together when speaking about morality‚ should be kept separate because they did not belong together. Kant believed that the only way to determine what was morally right and wrong could only be found by engaging reason‚ not religion
Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Morality
Ethical Perspective In the following paper I am going to describe the four different ethical perspectives. I will start by describing my own personal ethical perspective as described by the University of Phoenix Ethical Awareness Inventory. After I describe my personal ethical perspective I will evaluate all four of the ethical perspectives starting with character/virtue based. I will then continue with obligation/ deontology based and results/utilitarianism based. I will conclude with a brief description
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue ethics
Immanuel Kant’s perspective on morality is much different than John Stuart Mill. Unlike Mill‚ Kant believes that reason leads us to making moral decisions. We should use reason rather than “utility‚ religion‚ tradition‚ authority‚ happiness‚ desires‚ or institutions” (Vaughn 120). Rationality should always be used when we make decisions. Kant’s ethical theory states that “right actions have moral value only if they are done with a ‘good will’ -that is‚ a well to do your duty for duty’s sake” (Vaughn
Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Morality
Ethical Perspective MGT 344 W3 Individual Assignment University of Phoenix Darrell DiFabio October 20‚ 2008 Ethical Perspective Introduction Ethics can be defined as a philosophical study of moral values based on the concept of right and wrong. Therefore‚ ethical perspective could be considered as a person’s individual perception of moral values‚ beliefs and rules based on his or her personal view of right and wrong. The Ethics Awareness Inventory is a test devised to help individuals
Premium Ethics Morality Business ethics