Moral Behavior: Aquinas and Aristotle vs. Kant When comparing between the philosophies of St. Thomas Aquinas/Aristotle and those of Immanuel Kant when regarding moral behavior‚ there are some very fundamental differences. On one hand‚ you have Kant’s autonomous perspective on behavior morality‚ in which you give the law to yourself. On the other hand‚ you have the heteronomy views of Aristotle and Aquinas which concludes that one can measure their conduct against an external force. Kant’s
Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics
3. Depreciation percentage=$1‚640‚200/$15‚411‚620 = 10.64% New Fixed Assets=$15‚411‚620 + $30‚000‚000 = $45‚411‚620 $45‚411‚620*.1064 = $4‚831‚796 new depreciation Pro forma Income Statement Sales ($36‚599‚300*1.12) $40‚991‚216 Cost of Goods Sold ($26‚669‚496*1.12) 29‚869‚836 Other Expenses ($4‚641‚000*1.12) 5‚197‚920 Depreciation 4‚831‚796 EBIT 1‚091‚664 Interest 573‚200 Taxable Income 518‚464 Taxes
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet
The 1950’s-60’s70’s-80’s Miranda Moultrie Nixon Back Again The United States presidential election of 1968 was the 46th quadrennial presidential election‚ held on Tuesday‚ November 5‚ 1968. Moon Shot On July 21‚ 1969‚ President Nixon spoke from the Oval Office to Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin at the Sea of Tranquility on the Moon. Apollo 11 was the spaceflight that landed the first humans on the Moon‚ Americans Neil Armstrong and Woodstock A village in New York state
Premium Apollo 11 Richard Nixon Neil Armstrong
Skodol‚ Bender‚ and Morey (2014) as having to be constantly admired‚ having a superior sense of self‚ and lack of empathy for others (p. 422). This description perfectly describes Sheldon Cooper‚ a character on the CBS television show The Big Bang Theory. Sheldon Cooper is a theoretical physicist that works for the California Institute of Technology and he has his BS‚ MS‚ MA‚ PhD and ScD. All of this makes him very intelligent and only
Premium Psychology Human Personality psychology
a few days of an affliction so painful that for those few days before death you would be reduced to howling like a dog‚” (Bonevac‚ 460) you probably would not universally will the latter choice. Furthermore‚ as Roger Sullivan explains “according to Kant‚ our moral reason recognizes in an objective and disinterested way that we are not only persons having intrinsic worth but also finite beings with needs to be met‚ and it insists on the strict right of all human beings not only to strive for but to
Premium Death Suffering Suicide
Similarly‚ in a Rousseauian fashion‚ Kant suggests that the state under a civil union cannot wrong its citizens since it only passes laws that its own citizens would give to themselves‚ hence “consent” to (MM‚ 6:314). But while these passages and the overall tone of Kant’s writings suggest he is a social contract thinker‚ a deeper investigation demonstrates a conflict with many of the other tenants of Kant’s thought. Not only do most of the important elements that make up Kant’s political philosophy
Premium Political philosophy Social contract John Locke
Candide Free-will-agent Determine the course of action Leibniz Cause-effect Nature catastrophe disaster=knowledge Good and bad=moral Third person Good may distance readers from the protagonist/hero Genealogy Chain reaction‚ trace back the origin Disease: syphilisparody of genealogy love and cause and effect become questionable El Dorado The best‚ utopia Good: no material wealth‚ all in agreement‚ knowledge/gallery‚ safe (very hard to reach and surrounded by mountains)‚ open
Premium Candide
Professor Innes Jerry “Sean” Hughes Mid Term Kant vs. Bentham Throughout the realm of philosophy there have been many arguments on the idea of ethics and what motivates human nature and guides our judgments. I will be focusing on two philosophers both of whom tried to answer that question. Jeremy Bentham whose views on what should be used to guide our judgments as to what’s wrong or right have been defined as utilitarianism. Focusing on a different idea using morals and a sense of duty
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Kant‚ being a man of reason primarily‚ approaches his philosophy in a scientific manner. To explain‚ he breaks one thing into smaller things. Kant makes observations based on what he sees‚ hears‚ tastes‚ smells‚ and feels (like his three types of friendships). However‚ he does also make some conceptual assumptions (discussed earlier) such as his idea of putting love of humanity before self-love will cause reciprocation of friendship. Unlike Kierkegaard‚ Kant does not focus on religion
Premium Writing Essay English-language films
Kant‚ Thucydides‚ and Weber collectively agreed on one premise – human nature directly affect the political actions of a state‚ whether they be moral or immoral. Given the different time periods each of these political theorists studied in‚ each man had vastly different ideas on the consequences of human nature on political actions‚ or vice versa. Thucydides was a consequentialist‚ Kant was a staunch deontologist‚ and Weber believed that both consequentialism and deontology had their own place within
Premium Political philosophy Religion Plato