When researching the two philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke‚ I have come to a realization that they are both correct considering people are themselves no matter. When looking at a majority though I tend to side with John Locke. People are genuinely more loving and helpful people when it comes down to the bare minimum. For example when there is a natural disaster people are typically more helpful than harmful. One of the most recent examples is the two hurricanes that hit the south-eastern
Premium
The difference between Kant and Aristotle here can be traced to a difference over the nature of the will. For Kant‚ the will seems to be something that can be insulated completely from natural influences and inclinations. It is the only thing for which a person can be said to be completely responsible. And this isolated point of pure responsibility is the only proper subject of moral evaluation and hence esteem. Aristotle‚ on the other hand‚ has no notion of a point (or realm) of pure responsibility
Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Ethics
scared to think freely for themselves and to question the authority who guides them‚ and often what they are told by people in authority or people in the public eye turns out to be lies‚ humbug‚ or even bullshit. This argument is made by both Immanual Kant and Harry G. Frankfurt‚ who both claim that members of society don’t look into what is said often enough‚ and don’t raise questions. This is seen most commonly in the way American’s blindly follow the words of politicians. It is commonplace for people
Premium Lie Politician
Abstract According to John Locke‚ human rights are innate rights that are naturally inherent in every human being and can not be contested. John Locke explains that human rights is a natural right of the human being as a gift or a gift directly from God. Declaration on Human Rights 1948 had contribution in formed the commitment to respect and uphold the human dignity among the nation-state‚ in order to avoid the catastrophe of war that can destroy human values. However‚ the issue of politicization
Premium Political philosophy Human rights Law
Homework 7 Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that focused on religion and science. He often had ideas that religion was explained by science. He believed for someone to have room in their mind for faith‚ they needed to have less room in their mind for other things. If someone is uneducated and is interested in fires or hurting people‚ then they will have no room in their mind for faith and that is why they do not believe. A very important theory he discussed was the idea of how we learn. He believed
Premium Religion Science Scientific method
voice as they speak to them as an infant. Early learning as newborns to a year old is the foundation. John Locke believed that children are born with the ability to become anything or anyone they desire to become. They also have the ability to absorb anything being taught to them. I agree with Locke about the morals and values of a child. As the saying "garbage in‚ garbage out" implies Locke believed if a child watched and was taught immoral behavior they would follow the same pattern. Some children
Premium Developmental psychology Psychology Childhood
Thomas Hobbes was an absolute monarchist that believed human beings were organisms that were in constant motion‚ and needed to have some sort of authority or restraint‚ so they could be stopped from pursuing any selfish act. In contrast to John Locke were he believed in a democratic rule and constitutes that human nature was identified by reason and tolerance. The political ideology that Hobbes obtains is precise regarding the following points: people are naturally born with rights but must give
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes State of nature
believed in an ethical theory known as utilitarianism. Kant and Mill both articulate thought that praise the use of reason as the ultimate good‚ that which leads to enlightenment and a general understanding and certainty‚ as Mill would put it. The two philosophers‚ while both striving to reach the same goal‚ ultimately achieve their goals in a different sense‚ and even demonstrate slight discrepancy in what they ultimately mean to attain. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill both addresses the issues of
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
Marques Harvey PHIL 201 9/25/14 Immanuel Kant: Knowledge Is Both Rational and Empirical Immanuel Kant was renowned German philosopher who sought to reconcile the Continental rational philosophies with those of the British empirical philosophers. The rationalist philosophers‚ such as Descartes‚ believed that the fundamental source of all knowledge was not simply observation‚ but that it was a priori‚ which is independent of experience. It’s different from a posteriori‚ which is known as experiential
Premium Immanuel Kant
Kristen Biduk 6949215 Instructor: Pierre Daigneault Teaching Assistant: Dennis Papadopoulos PHIL 265 / 2A Introduction to Metaphysics Critical Assessment Word Count: 1596 It is very difficult to attribute characteristics to a mind when we know it does not actually exist in the physical realm. Though‚ personal identity has been connected to the mind. However‚ it is tricky to determine what exactly comprises one’s personal identity. Although it is a difficult concept to grasp
Premium Philosophy of mind Consciousness Metaphysics