"Kant vs locke" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 9 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant On Rehabilitation

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant argues that to “act in such a way that you always treat humanity‚ whether in your own person or in the person of any other‚ never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end” (O’Neill 167). Using people to end crime is wrong because the

    Premium Prison Criminal justice Sociology

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question 1: In his book‚ Leviathan‚ Thomas Hobbes provided a very radical‚ innovative‚ and contradictory answer to what he believed to be the origin and purpose of the state. He argues that the State exists because of a social contract with its people. The passage reads‚ “hereby it is manifest that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe‚ they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man.” As mentioned in this statement

    Premium

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Perhaps the most famous objection to view that all ideas derive from sense experience is that this is impossible. Both Locke and Hume appear to assume that sense experience gives us discrete ideas directly. As first examples of simple ideas‚ Locke lists ‘Yellow‚ White‚ Heat‚ Cold‚ Soft‚ Hard‚ Bitter‚ Sweet’ (Essay II.I.3). He supposes that what makes all experiences of yellow experiences of yellow is objective patterns of similarity between the experiences – yellow things all look ‘the same’. For

    Premium Difference Color White

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke represent the beginning of political science in the seventeenth century‚their ideas on what government should or shouldn’t do would be refined by Thomas Jefferson and other founding fathers thus becoming the basis of the constitutional democracy of the United States. Hobbes took a very different approach than Locke in what he thought of humans in general;the same goes for political matters. He thought people were savages when born and only under someone else’s leadership

    Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes Social contract

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    about government. The first philosophers name was Thomas Hobbes and he wrote the social contract. His social contract talked about giving the government total power. Whereas the other philosopher called John Locke had a different view on things. He disagreed and stated just the opposite. Locke is a little more practical with his philosophy. Hobbes believed in a monarchy over the people for more control in the city. He thought that a ruler should have total power over the people because he thought

    Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes Social contract

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    influencing two famous philosophical men. Thomas Hobbes‚ author of Leviathan‚ and John Locke‚ author of Second Treatise on Civil Government‚ drew on their experiences of England’s monarchical turmoil to conceive very different political theories. Both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were prominent political philosophers in the

    Premium Political philosophy United States Declaration of Independence United States

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx Vs John Locke Essay

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Locke said that it is very important for society as well as a place for government to have a grasp and control on its people‚ by being able to us land and private property as limits toward various extents. For Marx‚ he was on the other hand very against

    Premium Property Karl Marx Communism

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral Behavior: Aquinas and Aristotle vs. Kant When comparing between the philosophies of St. Thomas Aquinas/Aristotle and those of Immanuel Kant when regarding moral behavior‚ there are some very fundamental differences. On one hand‚ you have Kant’s autonomous perspective on behavior morality‚ in which you give the law to yourself. On the other hand‚ you have the heteronomy views of Aristotle and Aquinas which concludes that one can measure their conduct against an external force. Kant’s

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages

    effects of things are produced as per the universality of laws and it is called Nature. Accordingly‚ the universal imperative of duty may be expressed thus: Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature. Kant starts with the simple proposition that it is unfair for a person to do something that others don’t do‚ can’t do‚ or won’t do. If every individual refuses to do the some action which is good like refuse to pay tax‚ it does not fit into Universalist

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Deontological ethics

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    natural condition of mankind was a state liberty in which one was able to conduct one’s life as they saw fit. Like Rousseau’s‚ it was a time of peace between the people‚ but Locke’s was not necessarily a solitary life. • The state of nature for Locke was a state wherein there were no civil authorities or governments to punish people for transgressions against laws‚ but was not a state without morality. It was pre-political‚ but was not pre-moral. In it‚ persons were assumed to be equal to one another

    Premium

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 50