Audit Test 1 notes Board of Directors hires auditors Controller pays the auditors Audit Report is the auditor product If you find illegal can’t tell public but must notify the management and if they don’t do anything then maybe report -can then resign and report ALL auditors are reviewed every 3 years AICPA -makes standards for private companies ? PCAOB -sets standards (the SEC sets standard) -Quasi private public company -legal authority to set standards Assurance
Premium Auditing Financial audit
durhamInternational Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Exposure Draft December 2007 Comments are requested by April 30‚ 2008 Proposed International Standard on Auditing ISA 265‚ Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control and Related Conforming Amendments to Other ISAs REQUEST FOR COMMENTS The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)‚ an independent standardsetting body within the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)‚ approved the exposure draft
Premium Auditing Audit Internal control
controversial environment. Where a simple mishaps can end up in a heavy lawsuit. Under common law‚ audit professionals have the responsibility to their client to fulfill their agreed on contracts. However‚ if one audit fails to fulfill their contract‚ not only they have to take responsibility to their clients but in some circumstances‚ to parties other than their clients. These parties of those who rely on audit reports‚ therefore auditors also have the responsibility to them as professionals. In addition
Free Auditor's report Auditing Legal terms
A. Define audit risk. Audit risk is the risk that the auditors may unknowingly fail to appropriately modify their opinion on financial statements that are materially misstated. B. Describe its components of inherent risk‚ control risk‚ and detection risk. The risk of material misstatement may be separated into two components-inherent risk and control risk. Both inherent risk and control risk exist independently of the audit of financial statements‚ or in other words‚ the risk of misstatement
Premium Auditing Audit Risk
CHAPTER 17 COMPLETING THE AUDIT ENGAGEMENT Answers to Review Questions 17-1 A contingent liability is defined as an existing condition‚ situation‚ or set of circumstances involving uncertainty as to possible loss to an entity that ultimately will be resolved when some future event occurs or fails to occur. FASB ASC Topic 450‚ “Contingencies‚” classifies uncertainties into three categories: 1. Probable: The future event is likely to occur. 2. Reasonably possible: The chance of the future
Premium Auditing Financial statements Balance sheet
Question 1(12 marks) (1 mark for each relevant point) Scenario 1 o The auditor would need to confirm information provided by the CFO with the bondholder’s. o The CFO has classified the bond as current and provided a going concern note and therefore the financial statements are in compliance with GAAP. o The auditor would need to perform procedures as to the adequacy of the note disclosure. o If the going concern note disclosure is considered adequate‚ the auditor would issue an unqualified
Premium Risk Auditor's report Auditing
AUDITING ASSIGNMENT Topic: Auditing Assurance Standard IX Using the Work of an Expert By: Yash Mehta Tybcom – B 182 Acknowledgment I would like to thank Geeta ma’am for the opportunity given to us for making this informative project Would also like to thank KC COLLEGE for the knowledge we gain through such an interactive project.
Premium Auditing Auditor's report Audit
prospective audit client and the factors that auditors commonly consider in making the acceptance decision. [2] To give students experience in computing and interpreting preliminary analytical procedures commonly used in obtaining an understanding of a prospective client during the client acceptance decision process. [3] To raise issues relating to auditor independence in the context of client acceptance‚ both in terms of financial interests and the provision of non-audit services.
Premium Audit Financial audit Auditing
AUDIT EXPECTATION GAP The phrase "Audit Expectations Gap" was first introduced into the literature over thirty five years ago‚ by Liggio (1974)‚ under the Cohen Commission. It was defined as the difference between the levels of expected performance "as envisioned by the independent accountant and by the user of financial statements" The term ‘expectation gap’ is commonly utilized to describe the situation whereby a difference in expectation exists between a group with a certain expertise‚ and
Free Auditor's report Audit Auditing
during the period when the company’s operating results were manipulated. The SEC’s investigation revealed that personnel of the prominent accounting firm had altered the workpapers prepared during an earlier North Face audit to conceal a critical judgment error made by a Deloitte audit partner. The SEC revealed that Richard Fiedelman failed to document changes that his subordinates had made in the 1997 North Face workpapers. The auditor’s working papers provide the principal support for the auditor’s
Premium Financial audit Audit Auditing