Apparently‚ the issue of Nike’s case is to control and check the calculation cost of capital done by Joanna Cohen who is the assistant of a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group. But I am willing to tell you that it can be a complex case in which we can doubt about sensitivity analysis done by Kimi Ford (portfolio manager) too. Because her assumptions such as Revenue Growth Rate‚ COGS / Sales‚ S &A / Sales‚ Current Assets / Sales‚ and Current Liability / Sales have been adopted from previous income
Premium
Nike‚ Inc.: Cost of Capital Case 15 Financial Administration FINC 5713-180 Team 1 Fall 2013. October 8‚ 2013. Introduction Kimi Ford a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group which is a mutual-fund management firm‚ is considering to buy some shares from Nike‚ inc even if it’s share price had declined from the beginning of the year‚ for the Northpoint Large-cap fund she managed which invested mostly in Fortune 500 companies and it was doing well despite the decline
Premium Stock market Weighted average cost of capital Stock
CASE ANALYSIS NIKE THE SWEATSHOP DEBATE Summary of the Facts Nike was established in 1972 by former University of Oregon track star Phil Knight. ... Nike has $10 billion in annual revenues and sells its products in 140 countries. ... Nike has been dogged for more than a decade by repeated accusations that its products are made in sweatshops where workers‚ many of them children‚ slave away in hazardous conditions for less than subsistence wages. ... Many reporters‚ TV shows‚ companies and organizations
Premium Phil Knight Minimum wage Human rights
Case Study- Ford Motor Company Stacey Planz Strayer University Principles of Management Bus302 Professor Osburn January 22‚ 2011 Case Study- Ford Motor Company 1. The case creates four options to choose from. Discuss at least three criteria the company should use to decide which of the four listed options is best and the reasons why each criterion should be used: i. Economically profitable; to maximize Ford’s profits‚ it’s clear that North American factories are not doing good and
Premium Ford Motor Company Decision making Henry Ford
Kenneth Sikora February 20‚ 2013 MKTG 430 Nike Case Analysis In 1962‚ Nike started as a US distributor for the Japanese shoe manufacturer Onitsuka under the name of Blue Ribbon Sports selling merchandise out of the back of cars at track meets. It wasn’t long before they realized they wanted to start designing and manufacturing their own brand of athletic footwear. In 1972‚ they changed their name to Nike and developed their iconic swoosh logo. Their first innovative shoe featured a waffle
Premium Marketing
Nike‚ a company headquartered in Beaverton‚ Oregon‚ is a major force in the sports footwear and fashion industry‚ with annual sales exceeding $ 12 billion‚ more than half of which now come from outside the United States. The company was co-founded in 1964 by Phil Knight‚ a CPA at Price Waterhouse‚ and Bill Bowerman‚ college track coach‚ each investing $ 500 to start. The company‚ initially called Blue Ribbon Sports‚ changed its name to Nike in 1971 and adopted the “Swoosh” logo recognizable
Premium Nike, Inc. Bill Bowerman
Introduction Ford Motor Company was founded in 1903 by Henry Ford and eleven business associates. The company was responsible for the innovation of the moving assembly line where employees would remain in the same place while performing the same task on each automobile that move along the assembly line. Ford Motor Company has been a prominent car producer for over 100-years – an icon of U.S. manufacturing. However‚ the company has reached a pivotal impasse where timely planning has become crucial
Premium Ford Motor Company Assembly line Henry Ford
Nike Inc.: Cost of Capital The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is the overall required rate of return on a firm as a whole. It is important to calculate a firm’s cost of capital in order to determine the feasibility of a particular investment for a firm. I do not agree with Joanna Cohen’s WACC calculation. She calculated value of equity‚ value of debt‚ cost of equity‚ and cost of debt all incorrectly. For value of equity‚ Joanna simply used the number stated on the balance sheet instead
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Dividend yield Investment
Ford Motor Company ~ Case Study THE PROBLEM Despite the revamping effort‚ Ford remains plagued with prolonged Order-To-Delivery (OTD) time periods‚ congested inventories and issues with the procurement processes. After some research‚ these issues appear to be well addressed by the new direct business model of the Dell Computer Corporation. Dell differentiates itself through the utilization of virtual integration‚ an efficient and effective direct business model facilitated by electronic business
Premium Supply chain management Inventory Ford Motor Company
Nike Case Study Shiffaun L. Alston Jack Welch Management Institute Professor R. Chua JWMI 550 Sunday‚ December 7‚ 2014 Executive Summary Nike’s business model was based in outsourcing its manufacturing‚ then using the money it saved on aggressive marketing campaigns. However‚ the process of outsourcing work internationally proved to be problematic for Nike in a variety of ways particularly in regards to low wages provided workers and poor working conditions and environment. This paper intends
Premium Management