Análisis de caso Kodak Kodak en la encrucijada: la transición de fotografía en película a fotografía digital Índice 1. Hechos Relevantes * Análisis comercial * Análisis financiero * Modelo de competencia de 5 fuerzas * Análisis FODA * Análisis de cadena de valor 2. Problemas apremiantes 3. Problema principal 4. Posibles soluciones 5. Recomendación 6. Actualización de caso Análisis comercial: * Para el año 2000 los ingresos y las ganancias netas
Premium Empresa Estados Unidos Sociedad
In year 1994‚ KODAK had important strategic decisions to make in order to ensure that a bright future is waiting for KODAK. At that time‚ although Kodak was dominating the consumer photographic film market‚ it had been facing a 6% decline in market share over a five year period. The reasons for KODAK’s market share loss could be examined in two major parts; supply effect and demand effect. SUPPLY EFFECT DEMAND EFFECT -Attractive
Premium Brand Strategic management Marketing
Q2: How would you evaluate Kodak’s attempts to enter the digital business to date? Kodak was aware of the opportunities in the digital market as early as 1980s and allocated resources into the digital business‚ but the inconsistency of leadership strategies and resistance at the management level made it difficult to embrace opportunities in the digital market and stood out amid rigorous competitions. Kodak spent massive amount of research into exploring digital technologies since 1983‚ after Sony
Premium Management Marketing
Kodak’s current position in digital imaging is focused on three areas: 1. Image capture (digital cameras) – cameras are still not boosting profits‚ but Kodak has secured 15% of the market‚ and have boosted advertising spending towards s more integrated marketing effort 2. Services (online photo manipulation) - spent significant dollars on R&D developing software 3. Image output (digital kiosks‚ inkjet printers‚ paper and inks) – network of 19‚000 kiosks at retail stores are highly profitable
Premium Digital photography Camera Digital single-lens reflex camera
CASE STUDY REPORT 1 Case Study On Kodak‚ What Went Wrong? Patricia A. Webster Oklahoma Wesleyan University CASE STUDY REPORT 2 Introduction This case study will analyze what areas of failure caused Eastman Kodak to continue to have continued underperformance and misalignment within the company’s operations. There were four serious counts of corporate failure on the park of Kodak’s strategic planning and decision making. The analysis
Premium Strategic management
_____________________________ YOUR NAME_________Jordan Lewis_______ CASE __Kodak_________________ 1. What is/are the problem(s) in this case? Keep it to a single statement. At most‚ you may point out a couple of the key questions. The problem in the Kodak case is that Kodak is losing market value because they are reworking their product line‚ causing doubt in customer mindset. They have created the Funtime film to attempt to regain market value. 2. What are the key issues? This is just a simple list (condensed
Premium Marketing Pricing
KODAK PEST Political US copyright law requires all photo shops to refrain from printing or releasing digital images taken by professional photographers without a copyright release (2005; 2005). The company operates in different countries around the world therefore it needs to comply with those countries regulations for example‚ taxation policy and employment laws. The company has to take into account the stability of the government in countries where it operates to try and minimize political
Premium Digital camera Digital photography Image sensor
Kodak Case Study and Analysis February 27‚2012 1. Has Kodak followed the same generic strategy before and after 1993? What do you feel is the best generic strategy for the digital imaging business? Printer industry? Prior to 1993 I would say that Kodak’s generic strategy was broad differentiation. They were a well established company in business for more than 100 years‚ had a very strong brand identity‚ very strong reputation for their research and development‚ and a very broad distribution
Free Camera Digital photography Digital camera
Normative vs. Force Field Analysis Kim Schnitzer August 21‚ 2011 AIU Online Abstract The following pages contain information provided in a memo to BARTH‚ Inc from Working Better Group. This information is in reference to different forms of collecting information and analyzing it to make changes within the organization. Introduction The following pages discuss the comparison between the normative model and force field analysis. They will also discuss WBG’s selection of which form of data
Premium
films (Grayson‚ “How Color Changed the Movies). Following the timeline of the development of color in film‚ after the Lumière brothers in 1903‚ Kodak‚ an emerging photography company‚ introduces kodacolor in 1928. Again‚ in 1932‚ the Lumière brothers come up with an improvement of the autochrome process called
Premium Color Photography Light