Kodak Case Study 2) Compare traditional photography to digital imaging. What are the main structual differences? How have value creation and value capture changed from traditional to digital photography? The main difference between traditional photography and digital imaging is that digital imaging doesn’t need physical films to take pictures and papers to see the pictures taken. This changed the customer experience of the whole process of enjoying pictures as below. Traditional Photography
Premium Digital photography Digital camera Digital single-lens reflex camera
KODAK AT A CROSSROAD: THE TRANSITION FROM FILM-BASED TO DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY Case Objectives and Use After reading and studying this case‚ students should be able to (1) understand the forces of change that were reshaping the business environment for firms in the photography industry in the twenty-first century; (2) understand the risks involved in developing corporate level strategy when the cash cow business is in a declining market; and (3) Understand the risks involved in competing in a
Premium Photography Digital photography
Kodak’s current position in digital imaging is focused on three areas: 1. Image capture (digital cameras) – cameras are still not boosting profits‚ but Kodak has secured 15% of the market‚ and have boosted advertising spending towards s more integrated marketing effort 2. Services (online photo manipulation) - spent significant dollars on R&D developing software 3. Image output (digital kiosks‚ inkjet printers‚ paper and inks) – network of 19‚000 kiosks at retail stores are highly profitable
Premium Digital photography Camera Digital single-lens reflex camera
Kodak and the Digital Revolution [pic] [pic][pic]Brief Overview: Kodak is a multinational American corporation which has become a household name most known for its film products. The company has come face to face with many changes due to the digital revolution which has created a rapid changing photography industry. George Eastman began Kodak in 1880 and introduced the first Kodak camera in 1888 coining the slogan “you press the button‚ we do the rest.” Eastman held a high standard for the company
Premium Photography Mobile phone Digital photography
Kodak and the Digital Revolution GMAN 509 Strategic Management of Technological Innovation Summary In 1976 Kodak controlled 90% of the film market and 85% of camera sales in the United States. By 1992 the share of film market decreased by 5%. In 1991 they launched the first professional digital camera. In 1998 they spent $1.2 billion to two joint ventures with the Chinese government and by 1999 became number two in digital cameras in the United States with a 27% market share. In 2001 it launched
Premium Innovation Digital photography Marketing
Bullet Point Summary of Kodak and the Digital Revolution (A) Case Study Critical Issues surrounding Kodak include the following: Kodak’s business was based on the famous ‘razor-blade’ model where they would sell cameras cheaply and make huge profit margins on the consumables‚ the films. This model so deeply rooted in Kodak’s company culture that it didn’t see itself as something else than a film-making company‚ Kodak was still in the film business and not in the imaging business. Kodak’s critical
Premium Digital photography Camera Brand
Eastman Kodak Company in 1888‚ and pioneered the photography industry with new technology that would help bring photography to the mainstream. After its inception‚ Kodak created what many called a “monopoly” in the photography industry. Both in 1921 and in 1954 the company had to endure a consent decree imposed by the US Government in which it was concluded that Kodak monopolized the market in violation of the Sherman Act (the first and oldest of all US federal‚ antitrust laws). Kodak settled
Premium Supply and demand Marketing Elasticity
case six Eastman Kodak: Meeting the Digital Challenge Robert M. Grant January 2004 marked the beginning of Dan Carp’s fifth year as Eastman Kodak Inc.’s chief executive officer. By late February‚ it was looking as though 2004 would also be his most challenging. The year had begun with Kodak’s dissident shareholders becoming louder and bolder. The critical issue was Kodak’s digital imaging strategy that Carp had presented to investors in September 2003. The strategy called for a rapid acceleration
Premium Digital photography Photographic film Digital camera
CASE STUDY REPORT 1 Case Study On Kodak‚ What Went Wrong? Patricia A. Webster Oklahoma Wesleyan University CASE STUDY REPORT 2 Introduction This case study will analyze what areas of failure caused Eastman Kodak to continue to have continued underperformance and misalignment within the company’s operations. There were four serious counts of corporate failure on the park of Kodak’s strategic planning and decision making. The analysis
Premium Strategic management
Case preparation memo GROUP NAME _____________________________ YOUR NAME_________Jordan Lewis_______ CASE __Kodak_________________ 1. What is/are the problem(s) in this case? Keep it to a single statement. At most‚ you may point out a couple of the key questions. The problem in the Kodak case is that Kodak is losing market value because they are reworking their product line‚ causing doubt in customer mindset. They have created the Funtime film to attempt to regain market value. 2. What
Premium Marketing Pricing