Intro. Law/Legal 200 October 24‚ 2014 Case Briefing Assignment Katko v. Briney‚ 183 N.W.2d 657 (Iowa 1971). Procedure: Plaintiff Katko filed suit against Briney in Mahaska District Court seeking damages for injury suffered by defendant. After trial by jury and in accordance with jury verdict‚ Court awarded plaintiff actual and punitive damages. Court denied defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial. Defendant appealed. Facts: Plaintiff trespassed on defendant’s
Premium United States Appeal Jury
Mandeeppal Multani (JOHN) Professor Bernadette p. Mcpherson COR 201.07 Atkins v. Virginia Citation: 536 U.S. 304 (2002) Facts of the Case: On August 16‚ 1996‚ after a day of drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana‚ 18 year old Daryl Atkins and friend William Jones walked to a convenience store and abducted Eric Nesbitt‚ an airman from the nearby Langley Air Force Base. When abducted Eric Nesbitt‚ had 60 dollars in his wallet‚ Atkins then drove Nesbitt in his vehicle‚ pickup
Premium United States Crimes Murder
VALUE‚ IS NOT BEING GENERALY KNOWN TO OTHER PERSONS‚ AND IS SUNBJECT TO EFFORTS OF SECRECY IS A TRADE SECRET. I. DCH is entitled to preliminary injunction‚ because LH is a trade secret under OUTSA. Preliminary injunctions should always be granted in case as like this‚ where there is a substantial likelihood that the plaintiffs will prevail on the merits. Vanguard Transp. Sys. V. Edwards Transfer & Storage Co. Gen. Commodities Div.‚ 673 N.E.2d 182. (184). The burden of proof to establish this element
Premium Patent Law United States
and overall the case of Tennessee v. Lane it is first and foremost important to understand that the real debate of the case centered around whether or not “Does Congress have the power to "abrogate‚" i.e.‚ override‚ the states’ immunity from suit and authorize Title II plaintiffs to seek damages from the states?” or in other words does Congress have the power to deny state immunity from suits and authorize Title II to have the right to seek damages from states in simple terms. The case eventually boiled
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States
What are the significant differences between the Quinlan‚ Cruzan‚ and Wenland cases? Why are these three cases important? In the case of Quinlan‚ her wishes had been made known by previous oral and written statements she had made. In this case her father was the surrogate speaking her wishes and fighting the courts systems who had ruled against his decision to remove her respirator. This was then overturned on the grounds of the constitutional right to privacy covers the decisions of formerly
Premium
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist. 393 U.S. 503‚ 89 S.Ct. 733‚ 21 L.Ed.2d. 731 (1969). NATURE OF CASE: Petitioners‚ three public school pupils‚ in Des Moines‚ Iowa were suspended from school for violating a school board (respondents) policy of banning the wearing of armbands. The armbands represented the protest of Government policy in Vietnam. The District Court dismissed the complaint. On appeal‚ the Eight Circuit Court was equally divided‚ therefore affirmed the decision
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Frontiero v. Richardson In his opinion in the 1973 case Frontiero v. Richardson‚ Justice William Brennan stated‚“Our nation had a long and unfortunate history of sex discrimination‚ rationalized by an attitude of “romantic paternalism” which‚ in practical effect‚ put women not on a pedestal‚ but in a cage.” The Justice felt discrimination against women in America has been passed off ignorantly as romantic or reasonable. In 1973‚ Sharron Frontiero‚ a lieutenant in the U.S. Air Force‚ was treated
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
Jackson Bewley Mr. Uhler Humanities 8 12 November 2015 SCOTUS Simulation In the case Montgomery v. Louisiana Henry Montgomery was charged with the murder of Charles Hunt. He was sentenced to life in prison without parole. However he was only 17. Henry Montgomery should be sentenced to life in prison without parole because he committed murder. He was willing to kill an innocent man. 58% of states have come to the conclusion that the risk of releasing the murder under the age of 18 has the risk of
Premium Capital punishment Murder Crime
when looking at the legal case of Town of Greece v. Galloway‚ which could be argued as a case that violates the Establishment Clause. This case deals with the monthly business meetings in the town of Greece. Galloway and Stephens sued the town and John Auberger because they were feeling uncomfortable as each meeting began with a prayer (Stahl). Galloway and Stephens argued that they felt discriminated because Christian prayers were preferred the most (Stahl). In some cases‚ the existence and the enforcement
Premium Religion Human rights Islam
In the case of Gibbons v. Ogden‚ the State of New York “…gave individuals the exclusive right to operate steamboats on waters within state jurisdiction. Laws like this one were duplicated elsewhere which led to friction as some states would require foreign (out-of-state) boats to pay substantial fees for navigation privileges‚” as retrieved from www.oyez.com. In this case‚ the New York law violated federal law by giving in-state operators the monopoly on the coasting trade. The Court’s unanimous
Premium Brown v. Board of Education Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution