GE _ McKinsey Matrix QuickMBA / Strategy / GE-McKinsey Matrix GE / McKinsey Matrix In consulting engagements with General Electric in the 1970’s‚ McKinsey & Company developed a nine-cell portfolio matrix as a tool for screening GE’s large portfolio of strategic business units (SBU). This business screen became known as the GE/McKinsey Matrix and is shown below: GE / McKinsey Matrix Business Unit Strength High High Medium Low Medium Low The GE / McKinsey matrix is similar to the
Premium Strategic management
Directional Policy Matrix 1. Introduction Many large companies comprise several distinct divisions or strategic business units (SBUs). So one of the challenges facing the parent company of a multi-divisional company is to allocate resources to each division. So in order to make wise decisions on resource allocation‚ is there a tool that can assist senior executives determine the direction for each division or SBU? Actually there are two tools‚ the BCG matrix and the Directional Policy Matrix (DPM). We have
Premium Strategic management Strategic business unit
MATRIX FOR THE EASTERN AND WESTERN PHILOSOPHY |Eastern Countries |Religion |Origins & History | | |Senses are source of knowledge |Definition of soul as level of life
Premium Perception Mind Truth
The General Electric (GE) Market Attractiveness-Business Position Matrix is one of the best-known directional policy matrices‚ “which categorises business units into those with good prospects and those with less good prospects” (Johnson‚ Whittington & Scholes‚ 2011‚ p.252). The following two factors is the principal cause for the development of the GE Matrix. In the 20th century‚ since the blossoming of multi-activity enterprises‚ corporations have faced the challenge of managing its portfolio of
Premium Strategic management Strategic business unit Marketing
producing plants‚ in which 23 are producing cement now‚ one cement plant if for only white cement and 4 are going to start producing cement by the end of this year‚ and these plants are producing yearly about 18 million tons of cement. The BCG Matrix of HP RELATIVE MARKET SHARE POSITION High Medium Low 1.0
Premium Personal computer Portland cement
Boston Matrix Strategy Skills Team FME www.free-management-ebooks.com ISBN 978-1-62620-952-7 Copyright Notice © www.free-management-ebooks.com 2013. All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-1-62620-952-7 The material contained within this electronic publication is protected under International and Federal Copyright Laws and treaties‚ and as such any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is strictly prohibited. You may not copy‚ forward‚ or transfer this publication or any part of it‚ whether in electronic
Premium Strategic management Marketing
Marketing Critique: BCG Matrix Your Name Here Table of Contents Introduction 3 Concept Overview 3 Functional Critique 5 Intellectual Critique 6 Ethical Critique 7 Political Critique 8 Conclusion 8 Bibliography 9 Introduction This paper will attempt to provide a broad critique of the Boston Consulting Group Matrix in light of the ideas of Hackley (2009). In his book Marketing:A Critical Introduction‚ Hackley presents a framework for analysing marketing models. He suggests
Premium Marketing Strategic management Product management
been clearly to focus on a few niche areas and provide unique and differentiated value propositions to their guests. • Their brands ITC Hotel‚ Welcome Hotel‚ Fortune and Welcome Heritage‚ which spans luxury to mid-market segments‚ have been on a growth trajectory in recent months. They have leveraged the unique advantages that India offers in terms of diversity and heritage. • The physical architecture of their properties are unique and offer a local flavour to discerning guests. In FMCG
Premium Marketing Yogesh Chander Deveshwar Strategic business unit
Introduction of Ansoff Matrix This well known marketing tool was first published in the Harvard Business Review (1957) in an article called ’Strategies for Diversification’. It is used by marketers who have objectives for growth. Ansoff’s matrix offers strategic choices to achieve the objectives. There are four main categories for selection. The market penetration strategy is the least risky since it leverages many of the firm’s existing resources and capabilities. In a growing market‚ simply maintaining
Premium Marketing New product development Market penetration
GrTeaching Note to the Case The Growth Dilemma – A case on Infoedge India Limited by Deepak Pandit‚ EFPM 2008 EFPM Student Mobile: 91 9811311032 Email: efpm08deepak_p@mdi.ac.in Case Supervisor : Prof Amit Kapoor Case Facilitator: Dr Geeta Bajaj Relevance • • An understanding of the perspective of Top Mgmt at Info Edge Limited regarding the economic slowdown – By understanding the macro economic environment and its impact on performance of Infoedge Limited – By understanding
Premium Strategic management