Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Did the parties have a contract? If there was a contract between Big Time Toymaker (BTT) and Chou it was a bilateral contract that was binding when BTT (offeror) paid Chou (offeree) $25K in exchange for limited negotiation privileges for a 90-day period. Consequently‚ BTT bought the rights to negotiate the distribution agreements for Chou’s board game. A bilateral contract is an agreement of two promises and two performances. The
Premium Contract
The 90 day period that was paid off by BTT for Chou. After this there was no actual contract. They did discuss about having a contract and making it go through email but in the end there came out to be no contract. As it came out to be with no legal signatures from either of the sides then there was nothing to keep. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? The favor goes to Chou because BTT showed a lot when they gave in the 25
Premium Contract E-mail
Week Four Individual Case Scenario LAW/421 March 14‚ 2013 Week Four Individual Case Scenario By studying the situation‚ I don’t believe the 2 sides concerned ever had a deal. In the situation‚ the sides reached a deal just 3 days ahead of the conclusion of a 90-day time frame set in the initial negotiation deal. In the initial negotiation deal‚ it says that there would be no distribution agreement until it was on paper. As soon as the BTT manager posted the e-mail to Chou‚ he described
Premium Contract
Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Jennifer Ferrante LAW/421 – Contemporary Business Law Date August 18‚ 2013 Instructor Name Jane Schneider Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker In week four’s theory practice‚ we reviewed the case scenario of Big Time Toymaker vs Chou in regards to determining the validity of a contract. As we’ve reviewed‚ an agreement or mutual assent is of course essential to a valid contract but the law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning
Premium
In this document of LAW 421 Week 4 Big Time Toymaker you will find the next information: Read the “Theory to Practice” section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text. Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the “Theory to Practice” section‚ and complete the following in your response: At what point‚ if ever‚ did the parties have a contract? What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? Does the
Premium Contract Strategy Answer
partnership debts | Limited partners are prohibited by law from participating in management‚ can lose more than their investments‚ and get less than the general partners of unusually high profits | One partner can transfer a profit interest to an external party‚ but not control. | The general partners usually receive a management fee and share in profits. | There is only one level of taxation. General partnership
Premium Corporation Types of companies Types of business entity
Scenario: Big Time Toymaker LAW/421 April 23‚ 2012 Professor Douglas Edmunds 1. At what point‚ if ever‚ did the parties have a contract? The parties had a contract when they spoke of and agreed on the deal that was later followed up by a BTT manager via email. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? The facts that weigh in favor of chow include the email that was sent to him from the BTT manager as well as the fax that
Premium
Scenario: Big Time Toymaker LAW/421 Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Read the “Theory to Practice” section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text. Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the “Theory to Practice” section‚ and complete the following in your response: At the conclusion of the situation‚ BTT says that it’s not serious about releasing Chou’s new technique game‚ Strat. Presuming BTT and Chou have got a deal‚ and BTT has breached the agreement
Premium Contract
and Role of Law in Business‚ Society‚ and the Military Law/421 The Functions and Role of Law in Business‚ Society‚ and the Military The functions of law in businesses and society are very particular and these roles and functions can make or break a society or business. Every business‚ society‚ and military have to make sure that they follow the laws and that each business‚ society‚ and military has a set of laws that they abide by or they could face closure or anarchy. Law in these three
Premium United States Constitution United States United States Congress
Role and Functions of Law Paper University of Phoenix/Axia Law/421 – Contemporary Business Law Role and Functions of Law Paper The word law is defined as a system of principles and regulations of ethics and rules in order to keep people and also things in line‚ a set of rules of conduct. There are many functions of law in business and in society. Without the functions of laws many companies‚ etc. could and would not survive. Law is very valuable within businesses
Premium Law