police departments because law enforcement is societies first call for protection. Additionally‚ like the The Executive Order 13688 stated‚ “ The purpose of providing this equipment to Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs’) via Federal programs is to enhance and improve the LEAs’ mission to protect and serve their communities (Law Enforcement Equipment Working Group‚ 2015). However‚ with that being said‚ as the stakeholders mentioned in the Executive Order 13688‚ policies
Premium Police Security Constable
Assignment 2- Plastic Pollution Case Analysis Plastic pollution is the pollution caused by the disposal and accumulation of plastic material into the environment. Plastic is now the most common material that is a basic essential in our everyday life. They are all around us in the form of plastic bags‚ containers‚ credit/ debit cards‚ stationary‚ electronic items and many more. Plastic is a material made up of organic synthetic or semi-synthetic degradable matter. This matter can be broken
Premium Plastic Environmentalism Plastic recycling
black. However‚ your policy is not justified because Jim Crow Laws was already over in the 1990s‚ black people are not being treated equal‚ and competing in the tournament was Dondre Green’s “pursuit of happiness.” One reason why the management is not justified is because Jim Crow Laws was already over in the 1990s. For example‚ the Jim Crow Laws only lasted until the mid 1960s. This shows that the management is ignoring The Jim Crow laws. This also shows that the management is not treating everyone
Premium Black people Race White people
wCASE LAW * STILK v MYRICK (Law Of Contract: Rules of Consideration-m/s 18) Facts: the captain of a ship promises his crew that if they shared between them the work of two seamen who had deserted‚ the wages of the deserters would be shared out between them. Held: the promise was not binding because the seamen gave no consideration. They were already contractually bound to do any extra work to complete the voyage. * HEARTLEY v PONSONBY (Law Of Contract: Rules of Consideration-m/s 18) Facts:
Premium Contract Contract law
[Cite as Pusey v. Bator‚ 94 Ohio St.3d 275‚ 2002-Ohio-795.] PUSEY‚ EXR.‚ APPELLANT‚ v. BATOR ET AL.; GREIF BROTHERS CORPORATION‚ APPELLEE. [Cite as Pusey v. Bator (2002)‚ 94 Ohio St.3d 275.] Torts — Wrongful death — Employer hires independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property — Inherently dangerous work exception — If someone is injured by weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence‚ employer is vicariously liable even though guard responsible is an employee of the
Premium Security guard
Page 1 All ER Reprints/[1914-15] All ER Rep /Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep Breeders ’ Association and another - [1914-15] All ER Rep 900 Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep Breeders ’ Association and another [1914-15] All ER Rep 900 Also reported [1915] 1 Ch 881; 84 LJ Ch 688; 113 LT 159; 59 Sol Jo 478 CHANCERY DIVISION ASTBURY J 4‚ 25 MARCH 1915 31 MARCH 1915 Arbitration - Submission - Article of company - Application for membership of company and acceptance Rule for all disputes
Premium Contract
Question 1: In order for Ted and Mike to acquire the amount of $10‚000‚ they need to know where to obtain the money. Some ways that Ted and Mike can gather money is by taking out loans from the bank‚ putting a mortgage on their houses‚ start a part time job‚ take out small business loans‚ grants‚ funding‚ and look for investors to support their idea. There are many variations in which Ted and Mike can get money to start their business those are just a few. Ted and Mike will face a lot of complications
Premium Management Marketing Business
McCormick v Nowland (1985) ATPR 40-852 This case is to be contrasted with McCormick v Nowland (1985) ATPR 40-852 in which the vendor’s real estate agent falsely represented that the vendor’s house was made of brick and that the swimming pool in the back yard was adjacent to a public park. The Court here held that a real estate agent owes a duty of care to a purchaser with respect to the information supplied about the property. Pincus J found that the agent had been negligent in respect of the
Premium Real estate Law Common law
approached a Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum‚ Ahmedabad (rural) and demanded Rs 5 lakh from the company towards compensation. During the hearing‚ the consumer forum sent the sample to the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation’s laboratory for analysis. After hearing the case‚ the consumer forum asked the company to return the amount of Rs 8 back to Rajan. Besides‚ the forum also asked the company to pay Rs 4‚000 towards compensation for causing mental torture and towards litigation cost. Rajan was not
Premium United States Service of process Gujarat
“self-protection”‚ is carefully reviewed by assigned third party arbitrator. It is understood that any claim of medical malpractice‚ including any claims from Nittany Regional Medical center‚ arbitration party has carefully reviewed of legal laws and previous similar cases prior to binding this arbitration clause. The Arbitration party has concluded that suspension of Mr. Kevin Hyer was not fair‚ therefor we have come up with that suspension of Mr. Kevin Hyper shall be removed from his record and Nittany
Premium Nursing Arbitration