Canny Gabrial Castle v Volume Sales(p200): Canny Gabrial argued that the 2 companies were joint ventures Decision: Agreement was partnership Polkinghorne v Holland(p205): Was the giving of financial advice outside the ordinary business of the law firm‚ such that the partners would be jointly liable Decision: Held that the firm was liable for the actions of hollan’s son Lec 5 Chap 13 Balfour v Balfour(256): At the time of the agreement‚ did the parties intend the arrangement to be anything
Premium Contract
Referring to the article “Sinners in the hands of an angry God‚” which is the work of Jonathan Edwards‚ a religious scholar who acknowledges the idea that the Israelites sinned and were wicked in the eyes of God. According to Edwards‚ the Israelites were God`s chosen people‚ and they were privileged to live by the grace of God. As a result of their wickedness‚ there was an impending danger because the wrath of God was upon them. Despite this imminent risk of vengeance from God‚ they were given an
Premium God Christianity Sin
Facts of Solomon v Solomon Solomon was a leather merchant who converted his business into a Limited Company as Solomon & Co. limited (the ‘company’). The company so formed consisted on Solomon‚ his wife and five of his children as members. The company purchased the business of Solomon for £39‚000; the purchase consideration was paid in terms of £10‚000 debentures conferring a charge over the company’s assets‚ £20‚000 in fully paid‚ £1 share each and the balance in cash. The company in less than
Premium Corporation Limited liability
American literature from early Puritan beliefs to the Romanticism movement. With such a significant aspect like individuality there has been plenty of various views on the subject‚ like the difference between Emerson’s view in "Self Reliance" and Jonathan Edwards in "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God". Many philosophical and analytical scholars comment on the idea of individuality throughout the history of mankind. Every person attempts to answer
Premium Sociology Individualism Individual
Mr Shafron was not a member. Finally‚ Mr Shafron argued that if he was an officer (on either basis)‚ he had‚ in any event‚ not breached his duties in relation to either the ASX issue or the actuarial issue. 2. RELEVANT LAW FOR DECISION MAKING The relevant law relied on by the judge in making the decision was under section 180(1) of the Corporations Act which provides that directors and other officers of a corporation must exercise the powers and duties provided to them with the degree
Premium Corporation Appeal Decision making
CASES ON BANKING LAW Westminster Bank Ltd v. Hilton (1926) 43 TLR 124 As against the money of the customer’s in the banker’s hands the relationship between banker and customer is that of principal and agent: "It is well established that the normal relation between a banker and his customer is that of debtor and creditor‚ but it is equally well established that quoad the drawing and payment of the customer’s cheques as against money of the customer’s in the banker’s hands the relation is that
Premium Bank Contract Money
Jonathan Zawada is a terrifyingly skilled maker. Artist‚ yes. Designer‚ yes. Collaborator‚ also. Art Director‚ that too. Shaper-shifter‚ certainly. Zawada’s is a practice that skips fluidly between object design‚ sculpture‚ video‚ installation‚ painting‚ 3d simulations and fashion. Finding its roots in his earlier experience in web design‚ coding and animation‚ Zawada’s mind seems to want to constantly bend and play with the sin and symbols of our real and virtual landscapes. This fascination he
Premium Mind Thought Psychology
Case – British Railways board Vs Herrington Relevance - Trespasser duty of care - Common humanity - Occupiers liability act 1984 Facts - Railway line operated by BRB ran through property open to public - Fences were in poor repair - 1965 children seen on line - Child severely injured when he stepped on line after passing through broken fence - Plaintiff claimed damages for negligence Ruling - House of lords held over trespassers‚ a duty to take steps as common humanity to avert
Premium Tort law Tort Law
sought to be resolved in the present case involving the application for admission to the Philippine Bar of Vicente D. Ching. The facts of this case are as follows: Vicente D. Ching‚ the legitimate son of the spouses Tat Ching‚ a Chinese citizen‚ and Prescila A. Dulay‚ a Filipino‚ was born in Francia West‚ Tubao‚ La Union on 11 April 1964. Since his birth‚ Ching has resided in the Philippines. On 17 July 1998‚ Ching‚ after having completed a Bachelor of Laws course at the St. Louis University in
Premium Philippines Election Filipino language
Cruzan v. Director‚ Missouri Department of Health U.S. 261 (1990) was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6‚ 1989 and decided on June 25‚ 1990. In a 5-4 court decision‚ the court found in favor of the Missouri Dept. of Health. The court affirmed the ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri. However‚ it upheld the legal standard that competent persons are able to exercise the right to refuse medical treatment under the Due Process Clause and its implied right to privacy. Because
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States