Facts: A Case of Cold Pizza Lee Chambers‚ the Defendant was driving 10 km over the speed limit while making pizza deliveries using the company van. To avoid hitting a dog‚ he had incidentally skidded sideways on a patch of ice and crashed into another vehicle. Alice White‚ the plaintiff who was not wearing a seatbelt at the time had suffered numerous injuries. The Plaintiff had sued Lee Chambers and Vinnie’s Pizza Ltd. for general and special damages along with cost of car repairs‚ and loss of
Premium Tort Tort law
A. Known Facts John wanted to extend his house and built an office from there. He approached Sue after locating an advertisement from the Yellow Pages. As Sue’s price did not seem reasonable‚ John then approached Drawit Pty Ltd‚ which charged a hundred dollar less. John paid a deposit. Later‚ John went to Franks Hardware and Timber Yard. He made known to Frank‚ the sole proprietor‚ the purpose and requirement of the materials and placed an order. John signed a standard form contract
Premium Contract Contract law
Case Lets ABC and co was partnership firm which had dealership of Scooters Company ltd‚ bought a second hand scooter from Mr. B. ABC and co reconditioned and repaired the scooter. And sold it to Mr. A for Rs 50‚000. ABC and co told Mr. A that the scooter is a new scooter. Is Mr. A a consumer? And does he have any remedy under consumer protection act Mr. Q was going abroad for a business trip for two months. He wanted to give a power of attorney to his friend. Hence Mr. Q sent the Power of
Premium Contract Breach of contract Consumer protection
INSTRUCTOR’S RESOURCE MANUAL CHAPTER FIVE Scope Management To Accompany PROJECT MANAGEMENT: Achieving Competitive Advantage By Jeffrey K. Pinto CHAPTER FIVE PROJECT PROFILE — Airbus A380: Plane of the Future or Enormous White Elephant? Introduction 5.1 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT The Statement of Work 5.2 THE SCOPE STATEMENT The Work Breakdown Structure
Premium Project management Work breakdown structure
Commercial Code (UCC) Article 2‚ unless omitted or changed‚ the sale of any goods suggests a warranty by the seller that the goods are of reasonable and average quality. Also that it is fit for the ordinary purposes that the goods are to be used. In this case‚ because the car dealer has omitted personal injuries caused by the car‚ from the warranty provided to Raymond‚ the car dealer would be able to enforce the disclaimer against Raymond Smith. But since Raymond was simply driving the vehicle under ordinary
Premium Automobile Warranty Injury
Page 1 All ER Reprints/[1914-15] All ER Rep /Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep Breeders ’ Association and another - [1914-15] All ER Rep 900 Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep Breeders ’ Association and another [1914-15] All ER Rep 900 Also reported [1915] 1 Ch 881; 84 LJ Ch 688; 113 LT 159; 59 Sol Jo 478 CHANCERY DIVISION ASTBURY J 4‚ 25 MARCH 1915 31 MARCH 1915 Arbitration - Submission - Article of company - Application for membership of company and acceptance Rule for all disputes
Premium Contract
Drake and Keeler employer could argue the employment-at-will law was the reason for their discharge. According to Lisa Guerin‚ if Drake and Keeler are employed as at-will employees‚ then his or her employer does not need to have a good cause to fire him or her. In fact‚ if Drake and Keeler employer did not make it clear as to what kind of employee he or she was‚ then according to the law he or she is presumed to be hired as at-will. The only way Drake and Keeler can avoid being an at-will employee
Premium Employment National Labor Relations Act Tort law
“self-protection”‚ is carefully reviewed by assigned third party arbitrator. It is understood that any claim of medical malpractice‚ including any claims from Nittany Regional Medical center‚ arbitration party has carefully reviewed of legal laws and previous similar cases prior to binding this arbitration clause. The Arbitration party has concluded that suspension of Mr. Kevin Hyer was not fair‚ therefor we have come up with that suspension of Mr. Kevin Hyper shall be removed from his record and Nittany
Premium Nursing Arbitration
client. He would like to claim for such economic loss of $50‚000. In addition‚ Peter expects to claim for medical expenses of $10‚000 and loss of income of $20‚000 for the duration of the injury. REQUIRED: Advise Peter of his legal rights under the law of torts. (Maximum word length: 1‚000 words) Question 2 (10 marks) On Monday‚ Aaron wrote a letter to Ben offering 300 bags of cement at $100 per bag. On Wednesday‚ Ben received the letter of offer from Aaron and posted a reply letter to Aaron in
Premium Tort Week-day names
wCASE LAW * STILK v MYRICK (Law Of Contract: Rules of Consideration-m/s 18) Facts: the captain of a ship promises his crew that if they shared between them the work of two seamen who had deserted‚ the wages of the deserters would be shared out between them. Held: the promise was not binding because the seamen gave no consideration. They were already contractually bound to do any extra work to complete the voyage. * HEARTLEY v PONSONBY (Law Of Contract: Rules of Consideration-m/s 18) Facts:
Premium Contract Contract law