Promoters‚ as defined in Twycross v Grant (1877) 2 CPD 469‚ are persons who involved in the incorporation of a company. And the common law has extended the scope of “promoter” further in Tracy v Mandalay Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 215. In this case‚ the High Court held that the promoters are not just these persons who take an active part in the formation process‚ but also these who profits from the operation of the company with a passive role. Applying this doctrine to the case study‚ Alicia can
Premium Fiduciary Stock market Civil procedure
Lecture 1 Course Intro and Overview Purpose of Criminal Law 1. Regulate‚ maintain and enforce social conduct 2. Discourage behavior harmful to the society 3. Discourage behavior challenging authority’s legitimacy 4. Aim at enforcing society’s more favorable behavior 5. Use criminal sanctions for punishing offenders 6. Incapacitate offenders from continual harming the society 7. Rehabilitate offenders 8. Re-tribute offenders for the harm done 9. Deter potential/repeating
Free Crime Criminal law
A tort is a civil wrong that is outside of contract law and arises out of recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term ’tort’ refers to a number of different laws such as: • nuisance‚ • trespass and • assault Torts generally compensate the individual for personal loss or attacks on reputation‚ where the loss was caused by another person. Tort has as its basis common law. Negligence is now the dominant tort and the focus
Premium Contract Common law Tort
uberrimae fidei. S.35 dissolution. If not acting in good faith then the court can dissolve the partnership. S.28 duty to disclose‚ bond to render true account of all things affecting the partnership to any partners or their legal representatives. Law V Law [1905] – After the sales agreement there is a partnership asset that was not hidden from the account. But W had lost the right to avoid the contract as he takes the money while knowing disclosure had not made. Held: the
Premium Corporation Partnership
SUD1 Business Law Assignment 2 Law of Tort and Negligence Business Law Assignment 2 Law of Tort and Negligence Memo To: Padmanaban Badri Narayanan. From: Doan Le Khanh Vy (Ivy). Regarding: Report On Common Law. Date: 9th December 2012. I am Ivy from class SUD11‚ Sunderland of University. I write this memo to you in order to aid you comprehend my work easier. I have spent a great deal of time for this assignment. This is the first time I study law‚ so there a great
Premium Tort Common law Tort law
This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law‚ for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore Law Reports. BNJ (suing by her lawful father and litigation representative‚ B) v SMRT Trains Ltd and another [2013] SGHC 286 High Court — Suit No 432 of 2011 Vinodh Coomaraswamy JC (as he then was) 29–31 October 2012; 1–2‚ 5–9‚ 19–20 November 2012; 11 March 2013 Tort — Negligence — Breach
Premium Contract
CIVIL LAW GOLDEN NOTES 2011 UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS FACULTY OF CIVIL LAW MANILA Academic Year 2011‐2012 CIVIL LAW STUDENT COUNCIL Lester John A. Lomeda Wilfredo T. Bonilla‚ Jr. Raissa S. Saipudin Bernadette Faustine C. Balao Marc Mikhaele J. Santos Victor Lorenzo L. Villanuea President Vice‐President Secretary Treasurer Auditor Public Relations Officer TEAM: BAR‐OPS 2011 Diane Camilla R. Borja Carlo Artemus V
Premium Law Damages Contract
Executive Summary Various issues in the common law arise when agents make contracts on behalf of principals. Should a principal be bound when his agent makes a contract on his behalf that he would immediately wish to disavow? The tradeoffs resemble those in tort‚ so the least-cost avoider principle is useful for deciding which agreements are binding and can unify a number of different doctrines in agency law. In particular‚ an efficiency explanation can be found for the undisclosed-principal rule
Premium Contract
Republic of the Philippines CONGRESS OF THE PHILIPPINES Metro Manila Twelfth Congress Second Regular Session Begun and held in Metro Manila‚ on Monday‚ the twenty-second day of July‚ two thousand two. Republic Act No. 9182 December 23‚ 2002 AN ACT GRANTING TAX EXEMPTIONS AND FEE PRIVILEDGES TO SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES WHICH ACQUIRE OR INVEST IN NON-PERFORMING ASSETS‚ SETTING THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK THEREFOR‚ AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
Premium Debt Loan Asset
2010 Business Law Revision Booklet The Business Law final exam is 3 hours with 10 minutes of reading time. HOW TO ANSWER CASE STUDY QUESTIONS When answering this question student’s need to follow the format of: i) state the issue ii) state the law-this includes relevant legislation and cases iii) apply the law to the facts iv) state the conclusion Key words used in questions: Explain – students need to provide
Premium Contract Tort Common law