RUBRIC – PEER EVALUATION (ASSIGNMENT #4) STUDENT NAME (completing the peer evaluation):__________________________ Please review the following criteria and assign a grade to each of your peers within your group. There are 5 criteria worth a maximum of one mark each. This peer evaluation is confidential AND must be submitted to the instructor on the date of your presentation. Criteria 1 mark 0.5 mark 0 mark Attendance Attends all meetings. Misses one meeting. Misses more than one meeting. Role within
Premium Demonstration Decision making Communication
Bottom of Form Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Copy and paste the completed review into your reply to the post containing the assigned draft. Do not post your review as an attachment. Name of the Draft’s Author: Kelsey Johnson Name of the Peer Reviewer: Michael Julian Summary
Premium Writing Peer review
Please find attached Rima ’s paper. Here are the assignment instructions for the peer review: "Your instructor will assign and send you a peer ’s paper on Health Care Provider and Faith Diversity. Your job is to critically read the assignment and make corrections/comments using track changes and comments in Microsoft Word. Be sure to assess the paper using the following criteria: 1. Does the paper provide sufficient evidence for its hypothesis or claim? 2. Does the flow of the paper
Premium Health care provider Patient Health care
support the use of peer-assessment in higher education (e.g. Falchikov 1995; Magin & Helmore 2001; and see Hughes 2001 for an overview of potential benefits). For example‚ one study showed many Australian graduates to consider evaluating other people’s work to be an important graduate skill‚ but dido not believe their university helped them to acquire such skills (Boud & Falchikov 1989). Classes where students mark a colleague’s assignment may initiate skills of self-evaluation and reflection
Premium Assessment Evaluation Educational psychology
HUMN-432 Peer Evaluation of Presentations Your Name____ ______________________ Date __________ Title of Presentation Being Reviewed____Group A – Robotic Surgery Points You Would Award This Group ___150_____/150 Directions: This course asked you to think critically about the broader implications of technology. As such‚ you are now given the task of thinking and responding critically to the projects and presentations by your peers in this class. For each team‚ use the following
Premium Surgery Robot
Travel Log Peer Evaluation I chose to do my peer evaluation on Jessica. Her speech really stood out to me above the others and that is why I chose to do my evaluation on her. Her speech was about her trip to the Rivera Maya. She started her speech with an awesome introduction explaining that the reason for her trip to the Rivera Maya was that she had just got married and was going on her honeymoon. The content of Jessica’s speech was very organized. She explained her trip chronology from the first
Premium Explanation Thought Critical thinking
Peer Review Michael J DeVry University Considering the most integral part of one’s paper‚ the data and information provided has to be well founded. That is why the research portion is the most important part. Anyone‚ can form an opinion‚ in which in the individual’s point of view might drown out the factual evidence. Secondly‚ what good is legitimate factual information‚ if it is interpreted badly. Therefore‚ one must have an open mind‚ and see all sides of the topic before making irrational
Premium Peer review
The peer-reviewed science article “Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders” looks into discovering a more conclusive test of mirror neuron theory (MNS) on autism involving socio-emotional tasks in sample children with and without autism to show MNS activity. It was hypothesized that abnormal MNS functioning would be present during action imitation and observation in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The study used a pool
Premium Brain Neuroscience Autism
Peer Evaluation Sample The first speech I am going to evaluate is Jane Doe’s speech about why music is good for people and the positives effect of it. Jane started out very well by giving a personal example of using music in her own life which got the audience’s attention. I liked it when she started off with a story and example because it helped me understand what she was trying to say to the class. She then introduced her topic and stated her reasons of why everybody should have an iPod and
Premium Speech Critical thinking Debut albums
for their future. Being able to leave the world in good hands‚ so to speak‚ for generations to come. Showing our children what is right‚ and how to live a productive life‚ one well lived and to continue on for generations to come. Setting morals‚ learning accomplishments‚ and how to over-come obstacles. To be productive in life‚ without selfishness and greed. We want a better society for our children and grandchildren‚ and for the future of mankind. The central question is‚ have we prepared the future
Free Interpersonal relationship Family Human sexuality